Zero Evidence that 9/11 Was an Inside Job

Think about this fact. Who came up with the term 'sleeper cells', this system via their MSM.
The term 'sleeper cells' is clearly used to move away from conspiracy. There is a reason why, because they keep telling you there was no conspiracy, even try to let you think conspiracy does not exist (while the word conspiracy is in our language and dictionaries)
A real transparent and independent investigation by randomly picked individuals (not by a revolutionary system organisation that does want to see masses of demonstrating people on the streets) will never happen.

 

Zapruder was a freemason.That being the case,he was more than likely taping it to enjoy the murder so anything zapruder says holds no water over doctors,you sure love getting your head handed to you on a platter constantly.for the hundreth time being thrown back and to the left is not consistant from being shot in the back,your grasping at straws and as always,proved you slept through junior high school science classes. again,you wont watch that video cause you know you cant counter it with the evidence in it.you know it, I know it.

No YOU are the one constantly ignoring it in the fact it shows his head going backward and to the left inconsistant with a shot being fired from behind and I know this hurts your feelings but all 16 doctors are on videos in later years talking about there was a large exit wound in the back of the head which they agreed was an exit wound.If you ever did any reserarch you would know all this.

you clearly have done no research into this case,only see what you WANT to see proving that in spades refusing to watch those vidoes and talk about them or any of my points there and keep proving constantly you dont no one single thing about science or the laws of physics.your clearly seeking attention here and Im not going to take your bait anymore.

 

well said,but thats something a little too complicated for him to comprehend or understand.lol.

 

Why were all these "jews" in place on 9/11 if they had nothing to do with it? http://tinyurl.com/JewsAmericasWorstEnemies

 

Say no more, Zapruder's credibility is shot to hell right there.

 

He also cant get around Rubys sworn statement thats in the warren commission where he says-A WHOLE NEW FORM OF GOVERNMENT IS ABOUT TO TAKE OVER.which it did of course and were paying for it right now.at first when I watched JFK and i saw the actor playing RUBY say that,I asked this american history professor I know that has researched the case since 1967 and has read over a thousand books on it and has met many witnesses over the years,I asked him if it was really true that Ruby said that and he said yeah and that his testimony of that intereview is in the warren commission volumns and this professor guy is such a brain on this,i cant remember his exact words but it was something like-"yep thats in the warren commission matter of fact,exhibit b page so and so." I mean this guy is so intelligent he just blows me away with his knowledge he has.Thats why I wont bother with this thread starter anymore,not only does he prove he has no interest in the truth by refusing to address points brought up that prove him wrong and refusing to look at evidence in videos,he can brainwash other people that come on here with his propaganda, but it wont work on me because I have seen more things on the JFK assassination than he'll EVER see.He could see as well if he wanted to but he wont look into it as he has proven on this thread many times.

Like you said,he knows perfectly well as we do that they were inside jobs,he is just seeking attention and wanting to find someone to argue with him.Well I dont do that,I dont debate with someone who refuses to look at evidence that prove them wrong and evades points you bring up.He knows as well as we do,that he wouldnt even last one minute against a first grader if he debated with them the same way he debates us here.Not worth wasting my time on anymore.

 

Circumstantial at best. Not a "smoking gun".

 

Dr. Righteous, what is your rebuttle to this factual evidence from Jack Ruby?

 

You'll get it in return every time you spew your government agent bullsh.

 

yeah that would be nice.

 

yep,yep and yep.

 

Its so obvious that Chomsky is a shill that has been bought off and paid for,Chomsky is the one who has been debunked and yet he uses that source.I love it.

 

This coming from the guy who thought there were a bunch of volkswagen sized stars between the Earth and Moon that would have fried any astronauts on their way to the moon is just HYSTERICAL!!!

 

Somebody who had a blind dedication to JFK. There were alot of people like that, Ruby was just crazy enough to do what a lot of people wanted to do.

What news reports?

He went to jail.

Perhaps, but you're dodging the question. Prove that Ruby was allowed by Dallas police to pass freely thru a metal detector for the purpose of killing LHO.

What exactly was being contaminated? It was proven that the gun belonged to LHO. A gun belonging to LHO is going to have LHO's fingerprints all over it, and indeed, LHO's fingerprints were found all over it. What exactly was contaminated by the officer handling the gun? LHO's fingerprints on LHO's gun that was already proven to have LHO's fingerprints?

I agree that government constantly makes bonehead mistakes, which is why your position makes no sense. You give government WAY too much credit for being able to pull these things off.

 

yeah and as we know him.to avoid admitting defeat,he'll come up with something like-Prove he was a freemason.some kind of crap like that.lol. what cracks me up about his ramblings is he goes and asks me to give the names of a doctor who said the head shot was a shot to the front of the head,I give him the information he aksed for then he evades it by saying they have no credibilty. when HE is the one constantly losing credibility more so each and every time he posts with more deluded ramblings worse than the previous posts. He lost it major big time right here taking zapriders word for it over the dallas doctors.lol.

His posts are a joke,not worth giving him the attention he seeks anymore.Like i said,I want to deabte with someone who actually addresses ALL your points,not with someone who SELECTS points and ignores others and wont address evidence in videos.If he debated like that in a debating contest like he does here,as we both know and he does as well,he would be laughed out of the debating hall.

 

there is this one pic out there I have seen before where is shows Bush kissing one of these guys.seriously. i wish I knew where to fins it so I could post it but it was years ago wen i saw it.

 

So now Zapruder was in on the conspiracy? LOL. This just keeps getting better. Nothing but more baseless claims from you.

What doctors are you talking about?
You're still ignoring the video evidence. Zapruder's claims are proven by his own video.

You're not handing my head to me in any way shape or form. You're just making your position up as you go, filling this thread with baseless propaganda and paranoid speculation.

You're right. It's consistent with being shot from the back of the head, head jerking forward, and then JFK's backbrace catching his body and throwing him back and to the left.

Repetetive.

I can't watch the video. Explain it to me.

Sure, caused by the backbrace he was wearing. Frames 312-313 clearly show Kennedy's head jerking forward immediately on impact, with the exit wound on the front.



I see no evidence of an exit wound on the back of the head.

Prove it.

I've done plenty of research; the only thing I can conclude is that you are ignoring the basic video evidence, which is not subject to human error. All you do is make claims without backing them up. If you want to be taken seriously, provide credible sources to back up your claims.

 

yep especially since the neocons in the Bush administration said a year before he was elected they would need a pearl harbour like event to win popular support to invade Iraq.

 

The doctor has been debunked as always but of course he wont read that link.Lol.

 

Mountains that he wont read since he has proven he only sees what he WANTS to see.

 

Nice link. Looks pretty credible to me. More spyware/viruses?

 

It SHOULD be closed since its such a retarded thread and since you debunked it.

 

Unsurprising that you would blindly accept the claim that he is a Freemason without asking for any proof. I could say that anybody you disagree with is a free mason and in your mind, it will simply reinforce your illogical emotional beliefs that you have against them.

 

Yet another blatant, bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lie. Does ANYONE believe anything you say anymore that isn't already bat(*)(*)(*)(*) crazy?

 

the problem with that logic though is that if they were so incompetent like they claim,they should have been fired from their jobs and court martialed instead they were PROMOTED for their screwups.Yep no inside job.