Democrats losing it trying to attack Romney

and bluesguy would have us believe that Romney, gazillionaire that he is, could not have rented an econoline van for his vacation that would have held all the family and the dog inside the vehicle without problem.

what a joke.

 

He wasn't a gazillionaire or even rich at the time, showing more of your ignorance about him and he had no reason, his dog loved to travel in his crate.

So are people who transport their valuable show horses mean and cruel?

 

Its not about transporting them but about putting them on the top at the roof.

Let the voters decide if its mistreatment or not. Pls answer my question. Is mistreatment of animals justified because most of us eat animal meat anyway?

Let the people decide whether it was mistreatment or

 

Better arrest the guy driving this trailer.




Better close this zoo down.

 

Nothing wrong with at all.

When you tell me what the premise of your question is.........why do you even ask?

 

The incident happened sometime after 1982. Romney was already a Vice President of Bain & Capital by 1978. How little do you think Romney paid its Vice Presidents?

Its a simple question. Just answer it and I will let you know.

 

Not a gazillion.

Don't play those games, it's a dumb question, state your premise.

 

Last time I checked, it didn't take a gazillian bucks to get a bigger car.

Don't play those games, it's a dumb question, state your premise.[/QUOTE]

So that you can change your answer to suit your argument.

Let me answer the question myself. Even though we do eat meat it does not justify mistreating animals when they are alive.

Your turn.

 

They had a big car, that's how they got 7 people into it along with all their luggage.

OK................and..............you have a point in there? I don't think anyone said Obama's doggy dinners were mistreated before he ate them.

 

Could have taken a slighly bigger car. Or put the luggage up on the roof instead of the dog.


OK................and..............you have a point in there? I don't think anyone said Obama's doggy dinners were mistreated before he ate them.[/QUOTE]

Why are you so afraid of answering the question?

 

Why? The dog loved being in his crate and with all those people in the car I would not be surprised if they pulled a trailer for all the luggage.

As I already noted, the Romney's are devout Mormans and treating the animal with cruelity would have violated their religious beliefs.

Why do you ask stupid questions that have no point? You asked about mistreating animals before you ate them, the only animals in question that were eaten were eaten by Obama.

 

Ridiculous argument. The dog got sick and they still put it up there. How did they know the food they gave him was bad? Looks like an excuse.

It does have a point. Interesting that you go round and round in circles but won't answer a simple question. One can only conclude you are afraid of being proven wrong and are therefore dodging the question.

 

That they are Mormons is rediculus, I don't think so.

Well DUH, it was a BIG dog with the runs, you are going to put him IN the car with all the kids in there so he could have the runs on them and the inside of the car? How stupid that would have been.

How self-serving of you. Because she had put it up there to throw it out and he got into it.

I wish you would make it.

Your the one going round and round with stupid questions along with the stupid allegations about Romney.

Nothing to be wrong about, the dog loved traveling with them and wasn't mistreated, and certainly wasn't eaten.

 

he LOVED traveling in a crate! And you know this HOW???? because Mitt tells you so! Again... if Mitt had told you his dog loved to be hung by his back legs and beaten with sticks like a pinata, would you believe that as well? And, even I, who is not rich, could afford to rent a van big enough to carry my family and my pets on vacation. I would NEVER strap my family pet on the roof of my car for extended periods of time. I would never simply hose him off if he shat himself and stick him back up there and then, have the audacity to claim that he LOVED the experience... I cannot believe that koolaid drinking (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bags like you would believe that sort of nonsense.

 

The fact you are afraid to answer such a simple question only proves that you know your argument does not hold water.

Let me break it up for you. Putting the dog on the roof is considered by many as mistreatment of animals and Mitt Romney is actually Listed on Two National Animal Cruelty Registries.

Obama ate the dog as food in a culture where it is the custom to eat dog meat just as it is the custome in US to eat meat from cows, goats and many other animals.

The fact that Obama ate dog meat (while living in a culture where eating dog meat is the norm), does not justify mistreatment of the dog by Mitt Romney while it is still alive. The fact that Obama was only 6 at the time makes your argument even more ridiculous.
Substitute the word dog with any other animal and you will see for yourself that you are on the end of a losing argument.

Consider if Obama was accused of cruelty toward a turkey. What if he turns round and justifies it by saying "But Romney actually eats Turkey. I merely torture it" he would be called stupid. So when Mitt tries to justify his putting the dog on the roog bu saying Obama ate dog meat, he just looks stupud himself. At least to any sane person.

 

But you know he was quite poor at the time. He was just a mere Vice President of Bain & Co.

Just when you think the conservative arguments can't get more ridiculous, they prove you wrong.

 

Seems neither candidate is worthy of the dog vote.

Vote Ron Paul. He is opposed to torturing and/or eating dogs, and opposed to giving US aid to Zionists who condemn Palestinians the same way the orthodox Rabbi condemns a dog to death for "trespassing".

 

And he didn't because YOU say so......................spare me.

So whenever we see horse trailers with prized horses in them being pulled down the road we should stop them and call the pet police to arrest them for mistreatment?

Your faux outrage is so shallow.

 

And transporting horses is not? So why are you so afraid to state the premise of your question?

And Romney treated his as a member of the family.

Hey stick with it, attack Romney because he took his dog on vacation and we can attack Obama on his horrible job as President.

 

Raising five kids.................my wife works for a brokerage firm, even VP's aren't necessarily rich when they are starting out and raising a family.

But since the dog loved traveling in his crate, out dog loves being in is, there was no need for the added expense of renting a HUGE vehicle for two weeks.

So wanna bet that none of the legit Democrat sites bring it up again?

 

Apparently, I have had a lot more experience with treating family dogs with the love and affection that most dog owners DO give to their dogs. I will admit that some folks like you chain their dogs in the back yard and give them dog houses to sleep in while other dog owners let the dogs inside the house to actually sleep on the bed with them and to sit on the sofa next to them and actually be a part of the family. Most families that I know of that have family dogs treat them as members of the family. Most people that I know who have had horses, myself included, do not think of them as family members, and are quite content to let the horse live in the stable and to be transported behind a vehicle in a horse trailer.

I realize that you don't treat your family dogs with anywhere near the affection that I and most other dog owners do... so for you.... it is quite easy to believe Mitt's damage control spin after the fact that said that Seamus LOVED to ride strapped to the roof of the family car and to be hosed off occasionally when he shat himself. But then, as I said earlier, you'd believe just about anything Mitt said about anything.

 

I didn't know anyone puts horses on the roof of their cars.

I already did.

Hey you are the ones who keep attacking Obama over the dog. You are the ones who keep saying Romney mistreating the dog is ok since Obama ate the dog ergo that mistreating goats and other animals is ok because we do eventually end up killing them for meat and that is way worse.
No one was making it an election issue. People were just apalled that anyone would put a dog on the roof like that. Most view it as animal abuse and because of the incident, Romney's name is on 2 National Animal Cruelty Registers.

They were earning quite enough to spare a little extra money. Still doesn't justify animal cruelty though. Its like saying. "Yeah I stole. But so what. I was poor".

You know I regularly hit my dog with a stick and he really enjoys it. He does look sick but it must be the bad turkey.

Because Dems were over the Romney incident long ago. Not that we don't think its another example of Romney's lack of empathy. Its only Romney and the conservatives who keep bringing up the Obama story to defend the Romney one.

 

Self serving nonsense.

And crate them during the day when they go out.

And no evidence the Romney's did not and all the evidence they did with the affection with which they remember him and how he loved to go on vacation with them so much he would jump up and get in his crate by himself just as mine gets in his when he sense we are leaving to go somewhere.

Which is totally specious to the claims that the Romney's mistreated their dog by putting him in a travel crate no different from horse owners who DO LOVE THEIR ANIMALS use travel travels to transport theirs.

When you are reading to public attack them let me know until then your hypocrisy is blaring.

And more clueless bogus assertions on your part. You don't know squat. In fact I bet I treat mine better than you treat yours.

The only damage to control is the egg on the face of Democrats who tried to attack Romney and his family for making the dog a member of their family as opposed to Obama eating them.

 

A distinction without merit.

Nope.

I haven't attacked him at all, only pointed out that he ate dogs as opposed to Romney making them members of the family.

Nope pointing there was no mistreatment as opposed to eating them.

So it's OK to put them in a travel trailer if you are going to eat them.......................gotcha.

Now since we don't eat horses and all those trailers I see transporting show horses and just the family horses are no more "cruel" than transporting a dog, want to reconcile your hypocrisy?

It is the ONLY reason it is an issue now as before.

ROFL oh and it took a lot for someone to post that on them..........................more inane nonsense.

You have no idea, more utter conjecture on your part. But the bottom line is they had no need to do so.

Had it occured. But let me know when you start your national campaign about transporting horses in horse trailers pulled behind cars.

Hmm maybe I should list you on one the registries then.


Because Dems were over the Romney incident long ago. Not that we don't think its another example of Romney's lack of empathy. Its only Romney and the conservatives who keep bringing up the Obama story to defend the Romney one.[/QUOTE]

 

I bet if Romney crated one of his children on the roof of his car and told you that the kid LOVED it, you'd buy that too!

ANd when I leave my dog behind in the house, I don't put him in a cage... he hangs out on the sofa until we get home again.