Democrats losing it trying to attack Romney

Say what you want about Romney... (I'm not his greatest fan)... One thing about his campaign is that he ISN'T ignoring new media, like McCain did. And he's been a lot quicker on his feet, too... politically.

Obama's in big trouble in this fight. He's on the ropes. And Romney isn't about to give him any quarter.

 

The dog ate some bad meat and squirted it out, NO I would NOT put the dog into the crowded car with the rest of the family where if it had another accident it would get it all over the interior and the people in the car...................DUH. When we were evacuating for hurricane Ivan we took two cars, having room in the back of her van my daughter had her dog in a travel crate in the back. It got car sick several times. With each time we stopped, washed the crate out cleaned up the dog and put him back in the crate. Would it have been wise to let him get sick all over the interior of the car or better to keep him in the crate?

 

I think it has been hilarious the desperate attempts to by the left to defend the attacks on Romney. The fact remains it was stupid for the Democrats to issue the attacks in the first place, even more so they didn't vet them against Obama's own history.

The point being, they got egg on their face and I bet we don't see them try it again.

 

Go listen to the Romney's. How the H*LL do you know he didn't? My dog loves his crate, is waiting in it in the morning as we get ready to go to work. He also loves riding in the car especially with a window rolled down so he can take in all the smells, knowing he is going somewhere to play with us or have his day at the spa. I'd have no problem putting his crate on top of the car with him it it, with the front blocked from the direct wind and he'd have no problem with it.

He'd certainly like it more that us eating him. How is eating dog better treatment than taking them on vacation. Don't bother trying to spin it, it isn't.

You and the Dems got burned on your faux outrage, admit it and move on.

 

bull. the story about animal cruelty on the part of Romney may very well reverberate for a while. The story about young Obama eating what his mom cooked for him will not... except with the loony right fringe.... like you... and Obama was never gonna get your vote anyway. Reasonable, moderate or independent dog owners might think otherwise about voting for a guy who straps his dog to the roof of a moving car.

 

ROFL the dog loved it and certainly not crueler than eating them.

You want to bet the Democrats don't bring it up again?

 

This whole thread is a perfect example of how dumbed down and inane the average american has become... the small minority that does manage to pay a shred of attention are fixated on the most irrelevant stupidy that be brought up. Right morons and leftwing idiots argueing about nothing, argueing about this shiat like its a football game.

Obama ate dog as a child?... really... Romney used a dog crate to transport a dog... for fooks sake people... I tried to steer this thread onto something we should all be concerned about which are the blatantly obvious inconsistencies displayed by yet another corporate sellout promising us all the moon and stars.



But hell no... lets argue about who ate what and who crates their dog... thats whats important... thats what the future of this country rests on.

 

again...unless you can produce a video interview with Seamus where he smiled and wagged his tale when asked if he LOVED being stuck in a cage and strapped to the top of a moving vehicle, where he LOVED being hosed down from the diarrhea he suffered while stuck up there, only to be stuck up there some more, please quit saying that he loved it. All you have as evidence of that is that the Romney family says he loved it... the self-serving back pedaling response of family who abused their pet but doesn't want to look bad to American dog owners.

I'll bet that this story DOES have legs, and that Romney, the adult who strapped his family pet to the roof of his car will come off a lot worse that young Barack Obama who merely ate the food his mother prepared for him in a culture where that food source was totally acceptable.

 

Pretty sad when this is all they have against Romney.

 

oh...don't you know we've got hours of videotape that will show him on both sides of numerous major issues? You guys hung Kerry out to dry for being a flip flopper.... don't you KNOW that Mitt will be unable to escape that same fate?

What is sad is that your buddy bluesguy thinks that Obama eating dogmeat as a child in Indonesia somehow excuses Mitt strapping a family pet to the top of a moving car.... stopping only to hose the feces off of him and then getting back on the road!

 

You mean like Obama? LOL

 

no. I mean like what happened to Kerry. We've got great video tape of pro-choice Romney vs pro life Romney . Romney "path to citizenship" immigration vs, Romney "no special path to citizenship". Romney liking the Brady Bill vs Romney not liking the Brady Bill. Romney agreeing with Global warming vs. Romney disagreeing with Global warming. Romney for gays in the military vs, Romney against gays in the military. Romney against a constitutional amendment banning same sex marriage vs. Romney for it. Romney for mandated health insurance vs Romney against it.... and the list goes on and on... it will make for a whole series of marvelous commercials. Mitt is a whore. He will be whatever the group he happens to be talking to wants him to be. Hardly presidential.

 

and whether you guys like it or not, there IS something "presidential" about being the President of the United States. Mitt, the dog abusing whore, has got THAT to contend with.

 

It's what the Democrats were banking on with their faux outrage except they should have done a little research, they ended up with egg on the face. Just look at the faux outrage being posted here.

 

The Romney's have spoken several times about it. YOU have produced nothing to back up YOUR assertions the dog was treated badly.

What you have done is shown how silly it was in the first place and how the Democrats got egg on their face.

You've yet to explain why Seamus would have preferred to be roasted in the pit than go in vacation.

 

I think it hilarious to watch the attacker claim to know better how the dog faired than the Romney's and think it worse for the dog than being eaten.

Again bet the Democrats don't bring it up again along with the phony bigamy claims

 

So you think because you eat meat, its justifiable to mistreat cows and goats while they are still alive?

 

Are you kidding ... The Democrats Loved his Policies as Governor ... as a matter of fact, any reason why he's not talking about it?

 

hahaha... what a ridiculously false equivalency. the choice for the adult Romney was not whether to roast his pet or take it on vacation. The choice he was presented with was whether to strap the dog to the top of a moving car for hours on end or let it ride inside the car with the rest of the family.

The choice the child Obama was presented with was whether to eat what his mother prepared for him or go hungry that night.

And I don't need to "back up my assertions that the dog was treated badly". The dog was strapped to the roof of a moving vehicle. He shat himself. He was hosed off and strapped back up there again. I would simply let dog owners draw their own conclusions about whether that was appropriate treatment for the family pet. I would suggest it is YOU who needs to somehow PROOVE your silly assertion that "Seamus LOVED it" with something other than the self serving damage control spin that the Romney's themselves put on it.

If, for example, the Romney family had said... "we used to hang Seamus upside down by his back legs over the patio and then hit him with sticks like he was a pinata while we drank mint juleps... He LOVED it!" I suppose you would blindly accept that as well, eh?

 

Precisely, Cigar. How does a guy get to be a popular two term governor in the people's republic of massachusetts, THE most liberal state in the union? It is NOT by being "severely conservative". He will sing any song the *********s want him to sing now... and, if he ever gets into office, he will govern just as liberally from Washington as he did from Boston. He's a whore.

 

This is exactly what you ("they-conservatives) deserve when they made the decision three years ago to abandon governing, and commit to politicking to beat The president at any cost.

Well the cost will be The Presidency ... and Obama will win a second term, because The Republicans don't get it.

 

No I think a cow would rather go on vacation than be eaten. And since there was no mistreatment and the dog loved getting in his crate to go with them....................

 

The only thing false is the attack on Romeny and you claiming the dog didn't like going on vacation with them.

And your evidence Romeny ever considered eating his dog as opposed to Obama actually eating dog?

No the choice was taking the dog with them as they always did, in his travel crate, they didn't have room in the car, our putting him in dogging prison for two weeks along and without them.

You know you would do a lot better if did try to get away with posting lies.

"With Lolo, I learned how to eat small green chili peppers raw with dinner (plenty of rice), and, away from the dinner table, I was introduced to dog meat (tough), snake meat (tougher), and roasted grasshopper (crunchy)," part of the passage reads.

ROFLMAO so he had his dinner, dog was optional. Do you know that saying about when you find yourself in a hole stop digging. And in particular stop fabricating lies like you just told.

Then you can withdraw your baseless assertion.

Nope, the crate was strapped to the car, he was inside able to move about as necessary. Can't you get anything right?

Yes he had eaten some bad meat that one time. And you wonder why it was better to have him on top of the car rather than inside with the other seven occupants?

Wrong again, he put him back in the crate where he loved to ride.

The Romney's were/are dog owners and knew what was appropriate for the pet and that he loved getting into his crate and going with his family on vacation and you have NOTHING to show different.

The Romney's have been clear about it and being devout Mormons mistreating animals would violate their religious beliefs.

George Q. Cannon said, “These birds and animals and fish cannot speak, but they can suffer, and our God who created them, knows their sufferings, and will hold him who causes them to suffer unnecessarily to answer for it. It is a sin against their Creator.”

Unless you can prove they are lying...............

They didn't, let's deal with what they did say and your inability to refute it. And what Obama said and your inability to refute it or get away with misstating it.

In fact all you have done is misstate things, post fabrications and out right lie.

Enough of you. The bottom line is the Democrats got burned in their attempts to attack Romney over these matters, they officially will not do it again,a few fools will try to continue to do so.

 

Again you are deflecting. I repeat my question.

Because you eat meat, its justifiable to mistreat cows and goats while they are still alive?

Yes or No.

 

The premise of your question being what? The dog wasn't mistreated. Are cows mistreated when they are transported in semi-trailers for hours? How about show horses? I saw some emu's being transported the other day, is that mistreatment? Ever see chickens being transported no the back of flatbeds in cages, mistreatment?