RNC confirms Paul eligible for the nomination.

....

 

Obviously NOT EVERYWHERE:

POPULAR VOTE
ROMNEY, 9,809,662////PAUL 2,063,043.

So Paul didn't draw crowds at the voting booth.

Delegates: Romney, 1473////Paul Heh, Heh, Heh,,,,,,,118. 118 of 2003, 5.9% "Where's the Crowd?" Hiding in their mommy's basement smoking weed?

So no "crowd" of delegates for Paul either.

 

You have absolutely zero reading comprehension skills. My post was not about the qualities of any man, only that the GOP was left with a severe case of buyer's remorse after nominating Ford. Reagan, like Ron Paul this time around, was able to give his speech at the convention and, though he didn't get the nomination, left many feeling as though he should. As everyone knows, Reagan beat Carter in 1980 and likely would have done so in 1976 had he won the nomination.

I have a feeling that RP will be able to deliver such a speech in Tampa. If you want a reference on just what that speech may look like, you can refer to his speech at the Texas GOP Convention. His speech at Tampa will likely be a condensed and sharpened version of that Texas speech.

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/23150740

 

settle down man.Im on your side.you could have explained that without going into a temper tantrem.people make mistakes when they are rushed for time you know?Im not perfect,your not perfect.nobody is.you dont have to attack me for making a mistake.do I go around blatantly and arrogantly ignoring your facts and evidence like many people here do and many that have come on this thread do like those two posters above you always does for example?

at least I acknowlege it when Im wrong.I admit I was wrong in reading your post there.thats something half the posters here DONT do.attack THOSE kind of posters who blatantly ignore your facts and evidence you have presented before,not someone who doesnt and can acknowledge when he's wrong.

 

You just said you acknowledge when you're wrong yet you still keep telling us Ron Paul is the best choice.

Is that hypocrisy?

 

You said I was 'nuts' for my post and 'disliked' my post, but somehow I'm the one that had a temper tantrum? Thanks, but I can do without left-handed apologies, no matter whose side you say you are on.

 

B.S from you as always.The only hypocrisy here is from people like you who constantly make pathetic posts constantly that Romney is the best candidate and ignore how evil and corrupt he is. Yes unlike your capable of doing,I just acknowledged I was wrong.something YOU might try and do sometime.

Your pathetic posts full of hypocrisy constantly like all romney apologists do,ignore the FACTS that Romney just like Obama is is backed by zionists and is there to serve them and wall street and not us.You have failed miseraably in your ramblings to prove that ron paul is NOT a better choice,you know it,i Know it.

thats why all you can do is make pathetic posts like this that my post is hypocrisy when its YOUR posts that are full of hypocrisy constantly ignoring that fact romney like Obama, is backed by the zionists and just like obama,wants war and also like obama,does not believe in the constitution,two birds of a feather.as usual,nothing but pathetic lies form you as always.

 

I think you have me confused with someone else. I never post anything in favor of Romney, and I don't really post things in favor of Obama, though I will defend him from some of the outrageous lies used against him, but I do that more because I'm sick of the narratives and story telling instead of facts in politics.

When it comes down to it, I think both Obama and Romney are crap sandwiches, though I think Obama is probably crap sandwich Lite if you really get down to it. But, poop in your mouth is still poop in your mouth.

Ron Paul is a crap sandwich too, though not for the same reasons as Romney and Obama. Paul's cacka comes from his firm belief in antiquated systems and the idea that you accomplish more with less. That may work for a wardrobe or a living room, but not for a government.

But, just because Ron Paul is the green kind of cacka instead of the usual brown kind(and please, this is not a racial comment in the slightest) does not change the fact that he is still cacka.

Afterall, poop in your mouth is still poop in your mouth.

 

theres so many fools that have come on here and other threads saying they love zionist puppet Romney so much its hard to remember which ones they are so from your post it sure sounded like you were one and from many of your other crazy posts I have seen, I naturally thought you were one as well.lol.

Ron Paul would be our only chance to ever get anything to change,we would for the first time since nov 22nd 1963 have a president who believed in the constitution,wants to get rid of the evil instituions,the fed,the CIA AND FBI, is not a war mongrel,and is not backed by the zionists like obama and romney are.only an idiot after knowing THESE facts would not want to vote for paul knowing this.

that evil monster romney hasnt even hidden it that he would keep those corrupt institutions in like Obama has.when someone told him how paul wants to get rid of those and asked him why he thinks paul was nuts for that,he just walked away laughing saying yeah I know paul wants to get rid of them.that is funny he wants to get rid of those organizations.

He didnt even try and hide it that he would not try and get rid of those instituitions.the coward just laughed and ran off. Paul makes very sound good arguments why we need to get rid of those organizations.He doesnt run off.

The zionists whould be scared to death is he won the nomination.I am talking about RON here,not Rand by the way.lol.Rand has gone over to the dark side and sold his soul.lol.He recently gave money to Israel.He has been bought off and paid for and disgraced the family name. anyways the zionists would be scared to death if RON got the nomination cause once he got the republican nomination,its game over.He would humiliate Obama in debates and the corporate zionists controlled media could not censor the debates either like they always do with pauls speechs.lol.

 

Unfortunately I don't think Paul will be able to secure the nomination. I feel like his policies are still a little too early for everyone to flock to; Republicans and Democrats have to screw our nation over even more until the public starts to freak out. But at least Paul will have time to speak at the convention. The fact that we can have someone speaking about real issues is something to be proud of in itself. Good luck, Dr. Paul.

 

yeah the american sheople wont get off their arses to fight and take their country back from these criminals in washington so you know they'll fix it so that paul does not get in.But you got to at least think positive or you might as well curl over and die if you give up hope.Like you said,he'll at least get to speak at the convention and they wont be able to censor what he says like they have this whole campaine.they wont be able to censor out the applause.

 

Hereagain, you underestimate the American people. I think if you gave them a candidate they could get behind that wasn't a D or an R(or even if it was but that person was not a clone of the standard D and R candidates) you would be surprised. There have always been one or two candidates that have been projected to win, even before the advent of mass media and the internet. There always will be. There's never going to be a huge pool of candidates.

That said, insulting the American people because they don't choose to get behind this particular guy is silly. Have you ever stopped to consider that the problem may lay just as much with the candidate? I support third party candidates, but I'm not going to support someone just BECAUSE they are a third party candidate. That's where your problem lies. While I couldn't rule out the influence of the media, I believe the problem of why Ron Paul is not popular is because of him more than it is the media. Just because he's singing a different tune does not mean people want to hear that particular tune, or that they SHOULD want to hear that tune. Just because people are used to hearing the same two bad songs does not mean they're automatically going to like a third bad song.

 

He has, but how ironic every outcome has some sort of issue with the total tally?...hmmm...voter fraud in action.

I think so.

 

Of course you do. In 4Horsemen world, if the guy you picked for yourself loses, it must be because of shadowy behind the scenes corruption, and not at all with the candidate themselves. Do you believe that a majority of people actually did vote for Paul and that each and every primary was corrupted to make it appear that he only made it above the 20% line in one primary?

I can pretty much imagine your response already. The correct answer in this case is no(unless you can provide real evidence to the contrary, which you can't), what follows will almost certainly be a condemnation of the media and how they didn't give poor little Paul a chance, as if the media stood in each voting booth of all the primaries and told people who to vote for.

 

Actually, some folks have compiled some striking irregularities in some of the primary votes. This is in addition to the anecdotal evidence (much of it documented on video) including instances of ballots being lost, moved, etc. before counting.

I don't have the specific knowledge to make a good assessment in the case of algorithmic vote flipping, which is now being brought forward, but even I can see a couple of instances that stick out like a sore thumb.

If you want to take a glance at some of the graphs put together on this, here's a couple of links.

http://ralphlopez.hubpages.com/hub/Ron-Paul-Won-Early-Primaries-Mathematicians-Find

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0ByJAC-sfXwumZzI2bVlON2VTMnFyYVZZSnpDYnNyQQ/edit?pli=1

An interesting piece on the Nevada vote:

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/02/nevada-gop-chairwoman-resigns-over.html

 

You post links to BLOGS. Why not post a link to one of your former posts for confirmation? OPINIONS are not facts.

The FACTS are that Paul got slaughtered in the popular voting. Plain FACT.

You Paulobots live in a never, never fantasyland where green is blue because you found some uncredentialed idiot posted that on their blog.

PAUL LOST, Again, still, and as bad as he always did.

He did not get votes.

He did not get delegates.

He will not be nominated.

He will retire and fade from memory.

WHY?

Because this IS America and the MAJORITY wants nothing to do with the EGOTIST Paul and his miniscule band of naive bots.

 

And people like you will be eating their hats when they realize Obama nor Romney will help matters at all..

 

FACT Romney got 9,923,260 votes at the polls. Paul got 2,095,612,

Santorum more than Paul, Gingrich got more than Paul

ALL FACTS.

FACT Romey has 1521 delegates, 1399 of those a HARD TOTAL.

Paul has 156 delegates, 100 of those a HARD TOTAL.

Santorum has more than Paul, Gingrich has 14 less gross total but more HARD TOTAL.

ALL FACTS.

Do you understand FACTS instead of opinions and blogs?

You got a Paul FACT that shows he EVER had a chance,,,,,,,,EVER?

Here's another FACT. obama is much worse than Bush was. Amazing but true. That leads to an opinion question, how could Romney possibly be as bad?

Another FACT. Whether or not Paul would have been a good president is a moot point, because the FACT is he never WILL be the president.

So you can wallow in shoulda, woulda, coulda, but Paul WON'T be president.

I await your "winning" Paul FACTS!

 

Here's some facts about Romney for you...

FACT - Romney claims he wasn't CEO of Bain during the time a lot of corporations were destroyed and Bain profited from it, but he legally was AND received a salary during that time.

FACT - Romney was involved in the Damon Corporation scandal and profited from it.

FACT - Romney was in charge of Bain during the Ampad downfall where Bain profited.

FACT - Romney was 47th in job creation in Massachusetts during his time as Governor.

FACT - Romney claims to have never hired a company that employees illegal immigrants but confessed to hiring a lawn care company that did. Even after he knew they did, he still hired them for a full year after he knew.

FACT - Romney's 20% tax rate cut WILL add 3 trillion to the deficit

And this is the person you think will be better than Obama?? Newsflash....he won't because they are BOTH bad for this country....FACT

And you condemn Paul and supporters because you think they are bad??? The level of stupidity on that reasoning is astounding...

 

Using the argument that Romney and Obama are both bad which means that Ron Paul must be good is also astounding for it's ignorance. Got news for you. All three of them are crap sandwiches.

 

All ^this aside, Will you prefer hot sauce or salad dressing on your hat when it's time to eat it?

 

It's just true. no spin needed. both Romney and Obama ARE bad and RP is the only one good.

 

Got to run, no time to debunk the rest of this liberal bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

Here's some facts
Unemployment at the start 7.8%, now, 8.2% pitiful compared to Romney.

Romney surplus of $2 billion for 4 years.

obie deficits of $6 TRILLION for 4 years.

Friday GDP will be lower for the 3 rd quarter in a row. STARTING THE OBAMA RECESSION OF 2012.

 

there you go rambling again.You obviously have not read through any of my posts I have on this thread till the last one when you came on because if you had,you would see I have proved that the american people ARE behind paul. you obviously missed how in all his places he goes to,his stadiums are packed to the maxes despite the trollings of a certain poser on here to prove otherwise,his crowds are packed to the maxes,both romney and obamas crowds are LUCKY of they are even halfway full and it was even announced on the LAMESTREAM media that obama and romneys approval ratings are around the saem which is hystericla because obama has around the same approval rating that Bush had when he left office which was the lowest approval rating of any president ever.hahahahaha yep,the american people arent behind paul alright. they are behind paul because of the previous reasons i mentioned that you ignored.they know he is a RINO and not bought off and corrupt by special interests like romney and obama are.lol.get with the program.

 

He somehow leaves out the FACT that Romneys camp has been caught committing vote fraud.how conveint for him.