German female rower is sent home amid claims her boyfriend belongs to the "far right"

Just putting a thought out there. You don't think it's possible?

 

I don't know, yes, I suppose it IS possible.

I would like to know though.

Where did the story first break, on what media source, do we know that?

 

Natalie Portman is better.

I would demand her during any peace talks.

 

I can agree with that

 

I think the Jewish community shoudl send her here, to me.

It would be good PR for them, etc.

Failing her, I will take the first one in your pics.

I can be flexible.

Remember, I would not ENJOY it.

But I would do it....for diplomacy.

 

That's because you don't have a clue.

The Nazis were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS, not socialists.

 

help me out here.

Who are these wicked smart designers and who would be in control of this "fully controlled systhesis"?

 

You have a natural talent of turning any thread into a thread about Jews regardless of what the topic actually is.

 

Government control of business and of the private sector. Socialists. Where I come from....that isn't right wing. But I live in America where right wing is less government control over the private sector. So maybe we have a clue here.

 

Duh...it wasn't me who put the bleedin' pics up.

Get a clue.

 

Social ownership and cooperative control of the means of production is socialism. Only state socialists advocate gov't control.

But "business" and "private sector" control is not socialism.

 

We are sick of nazis and their revisionist theories, when WE were faced with the consequences that resulted from WWII. We are sick of the likes of persons who continue to promulgate nazi propaganda and who cannot discuss anything without blaming jooos. We have done it all before, you will excuse us when we no longer beleive it. BTW interesting that I am apparently no longer on ignore. why the change of heart?

Here you begin in earnst with your joooish angle. Who are the "to many" who claim that a jew is another race, except for neo-nazis who subscribe to eugenics?

Again you return to your favourite topic, later in the thread claiming it was Polar Bear who did so with pictures - which funnily enough - at the time, you claimed not to be able to identify as jewish. Too obvious, Jack. It reminds me of when my kid pretends to have brushed her teeth. We know Jack.

LOL, yes it always is.

I read the link that polar Bear provided and this OP relates to France. The article itself refers to blue collar unemployed as being the main supporters of the neo-nazis. As to censorhip, our law does not allow a party to publically deny genocide. It includes all genocide BTW, so your claiming that it only refers to Joos, is not true. It allows you to rant and rave in private though but we will never again provide a stage for nazis to rise up and destroy what we have painfully built.

More of your jooish obsession - which you will later claim not to have begun.

Well, yes we have done wrong and one might be forgiven to think that Europe is still stuck in that mindset. But please bear in mind that a few nutty conspiracists, does not a continent make. The fact that this women knew that she had shamed herself, indicates what we really think.

This is revisionist hogwash with the usual qualification "some people think this or that". This revisionist version of reality should be linked to sources, so that we can laugh at it more. This is indeed what my country rallies against. We know that no one is to blame but Hitler and his cronies and we feel embarassed for thosewho would rationalise it any other way.

This is not borne out in facts. We ban outright any groups based in hate and who deny any genocide. This includes left win groups, right wing groups and militant islamic groups. We do not want a reoccurence of WWII and it should be obvious to you as to why that is.

This is not borne out in the facts. Making it difficult and criminalising nazism, means that it is fringe in our society as you can see by the reaction to this woman. It should remain fringe and normal people should be ashamed to hold such views.

It is our business firstly because she represents us and secondly because she used state funds to have her bf travel to a neo-nazi rally which is contrary to our constitution and for which I will not pay.

It is not a broad term. It is a legal term that is given meaning by our courts, as courst do all the time. There are specific criteria and like all legal terms it is established by looking to the intention and actions of a group in light of our constitution.

Well perhaps you should inform yourself of the nazis views on eugenics because you dismiss much of the holocaust as being a myth, I find it hard to beleive that this little issue, you failed to notice. Convenient perhaps?

Please post a link to this "theory". As was pointed out it is an abbreviation and I know of no other way that political parties are named.

Seperate but equal was also attempted in apartheid South Africa. We all know what it really means.

Based on all his posts from the moment he joined the thread, it is obvious that this is the only reality he can see. It must be aweful to accept that a country has its own issues with its history and that not everything can be blamed on joooos.

 

There was plenty of free market enterprise in Nazi Germany. Stop listening to Glenn Beck.

They were a right wing party because they were interested in supporting German traditions and getting rid of this newfangled way of running things called democracy.

 

Who's calling the shots at the top? I can't answer that. I recommend the works by Antony C. Sutton, particularly "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler" and "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution" as very good at tying together how the system works.

They can be read for free online:

http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/

http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/

Or if you prefer, you can watch some of Sutton's interviews on youtube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PqM-CMoa9M&feature=related

So, who are the controllers? I don't know. There is plenty of evidence to support that there is, in fact, a system of control that exists beyond the scope of national governments and that is effective in shaping the future towards it's own advantage.

 

That's not true, it's only propaganda pushed on you by the corporate media to give you the false impression that there is a choice in government. There is no party representing less government control in the US. It is two parties that both represent a big government for big business corporate oligarchy.

 

What exactly would be the purpose of a Zionist group joining forces with another group that explicitly hates Jews and wants to systematically kill them off?

 

Regardless of foreign policy and economic policy, most nationalist movements have a hateful or at least distrustful view of outsiders and immigrants.

There are exceptions to this, but it's more common to have this xenophobia than not.

When it comes to American nationalists, it really depends on the political orientation. The most right wing nationalists here resemble the Nazis in social views, but are mixed in economic views. Pat Buchanan is a good example.

There are more neocon nationalists as well, although they vary between warmongers who hate immigrants to warmongers that embrace them as long as they follow the legal path of citizenship.

Then there are Ron Paul nationalists that don't have anything against immigrants, but they also don't subscribe to socialistic economic policies and tend to be isolationist or non-interventionist in foreign policy. Ron Paul nationalists tend to express their nationalism in terms of our government doctrine rather than an actual monocultural agenda. Since we're more of an ideology-driven society than a cultural one, the Constitution serves as the basis for this brand of nationalism.

Left-wing nationalists are a lot less common, although we do have socialists -- just not many of the nationalistic variety.

 

How so?

Being rejected from a team is nowhere near persecution.

Even in America, something like this would happen. You have the freedom of speech here, but that includes the public expressing their disapproval of your speech -- which sometimes involves being expelled from a position of public representation.

 

Right Wing is not a party. But Right Wingers do influence like minded candidates and policies---due to the thing called "voting someone in or out of office".

I totally agree that left without the voters input---both parties would be for more government.

 

Interesting that Sutton concludes that the "international jewish conspiracy" is bogus and that there is absolutely no empircal proof of its existence, however he does point the finger at gentile bankers in New York as possibly promoting the "jewish angle" as cover while financing and cashing in on the russian revolution.

 

Yes, very interesting. For the record, I haven't promoted the notion that there is an international "Jewish" conspiracy. I have promoted the notion that there is an international conspiracy, though. I don't believe that it is exclusive to nor from Jews. I believe that there are powerful people from all corners of the globe being used as pawns to promote an agenda while simultaneously diverting attention from the truth through various means of distraction, misinformation, and discrediting/"debunking" those that are seeking the truth.

 

If it isn't exclusive to Jews, why is Holocaust Worship™ (and funding Israel, and enacting hate crimes laws, and taking away our guns) the exclusive religion of this elite cabal?

It seems like some of the major activities of the NWO only benefit Jewish interests. "Make sure those goyim don't criticize, much less rise up against us ever again..."



.

 

The official religion of this cabal is to create conflict and manipulate bith sides in a conflict, and to that end, the establishment of Israel as a Jewish state in the ME is get useful. You're barking up the wrong tree.

 

You're thinking is too narrow-minded.

It's not a Jewish conspiracy whatsoever, it's an international conspiracy. The movement against the people, for a select few, has existed LONG before Zionism and long before Israel. Long before Zionism, we've had countless wars, we've had collapsing economies, we've had destruction of sovereignty, we've had control and domination by a tiny few - over the grand many.

Listen, Israel and ZIONISM is not the ROOT of the conspiracy, it's NOT. It's merely a very helpful tool. I can tell you know, Zionism will start WW3, and that will be it's last great act. People who are hung on a Zionist conspiracy, cannot see the whole grand picture. They cannot see what is hidden in plain view. The plan has existed far beyond Israel.

People need to actually do some research. Look into organisations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the CFR's goal is to erode national sovereignty. Look at the EU, look at the African Union, Pacific Union and the coming American Union. This is the work of the CFR. Read the documents and publications of this group and you'll see that since 1922, they have worked towards eroding national boundaries. That's just the tip of the iceberg, look into Club of Rome (global warming and green agenda), Trilateral commission etc (World governance). These are the secret players.

 

Both parties do favor expanding government. The left vs right paradigm is a false choice distraction presented to the masses to make them think they have a choice in governance.