The Republican party mostly represents white people?

actually, at the time of his remarks, Ken Mehlman was representing the Republican Party. But you are quite right about who the GOP is for.

 

The Democrat Party is for racists, fruits and nuts.

 

I have absolutely no interest in finding the text of the chairman of the GOP's speech apologizing to the NAACP. I know he made the speech, and I have posted the relevant passages of that speech. It is YOU who have claimed that I have somehow quoted him "out of context". Prove it. Put up or shut up.

Nice continuing dodge of Phillip's remarks, btw. Pretty typical.

 

I'll remark on Phillip's remarks in the same way that I remark on Mehlman's, after reviewing what he said, not just a few sentences that you choose. Link to the entire remarks or shut up.

 

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

run away.

YOU said I quoted Mehlman out of context. How would you possibly know that unless you had read the entire speech and had some insight as to make such a claim. If I did, as you claim, quote him out of context, please produce the "context" that would prove that claim.

coward.

 

Because I know how racists Democrats like you think. You made the claim of what Mehlman meant by his remarks. Now prove it by citing his entire speech so the context can be judged by others, not just you.

What are you afraid of?

 

Would you like a little salt to speed things up for you?

 

Maybe too man enchiladas have clogged your arteries and have slowed you down a bit. It would be a shame is some of that crud let loose and lodged in a critical area.

 

Why wouldn't the Repubican Party be mostly white since the country is mostly white? Both parties should be mostly white since the country is mostly white, but since blacks ALWAYS vote race only and all the minorities will always vote against the majority, they become democrats in order to combine their votes to overthrow majority rule. I thought the majority was supposed to rule in this nation just like we insisted the majority of blacks must rule South Africa and evict the white class. If we had what the democrats wanted for South Africa, the president would be singing "Kill The Black Man". Do you see the problem here? This is what others see and is the reason they are ready for armed resistance to anymore Liberalism or Blacks with fake birth certificates and Muslim/Communist ties.

 

Since the country is mostly white and the majority of blacks today who vote the straight democrap ticket are essentially living an indolent life on the entitlement slave plantation under this mulatto president, I suggest once Romney becomes president that we promote the idea (perhaps through an executive fiat) that we put blacks back into a real slave situation to where they'll at least get to work for their keep and in the process get the feeling that they're accomplishing something in their lives. Just think what this would do, blacks wouldn't be able to vote which would ensure we always have a Conservative president, and one that will honor our Constitution and our traditions. Never would there be a fear that marxism/communism would seep into our society again. YIPPEE!!!!

 

afraid of? nothing.

I quoted Mehlman. His words speak for themselves.

If you think he meant something else by those words, perhaps you might explain that to us?

 

and this, southernman...is proof positive of my argument all along. Here is one of your republican cohorts suggesting that, if we elect Romney, we should enslave blacks in America. ANd you all really WONDER why blacks don't vote for the GOP?????

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SH!T UP!

 

I have no idea what he meant because I didn't read the entire speech.

 

sucks to be you then, I guess.

 

I don't know the poster well enough to assume what he meant, but it appears that he's using absurdity to highlight the absurdity of blacks entrenching themselves so firmly in the Democrat Party's ass crack that they have started to resemble sh1t itself.

Assuming your position for a moment that he's a racist, or whatever label that you care to place on him, one person does not define a group of millions.

He does bring up a good point though that folks who don't contribute to society yet suck off its teet shouldn't be allowed to vote. Andrew Wilcow calls these the "zero liability voter" or some thing like that, meaning that they have no incentive to vote for candidates that are fiscally responsible. These folks make up the base of your party and without their votes the Democrats would all but disappear. Or, the Democrats would have to become fiscally responsible.

 

you sir, just proved everything people have been telling "conservatives" from the start. nothing else needs to be said, everyone sees the problem with GOP and "conservatives" and how they don't want to change their ways. can't understand how some people's moral compass is so out of whack, that I believe they can't find their ass. instead of denouncing his words, you defend him....crazy.

 

I'll just wait to see how many "conservatives" denounce this post....you know, since the "GOP" isn't racist and all....

 

I feel sorry for guys like you (leftists) who can't come to grips with the reality that blacks are being enslaved today by the democrap party, and that they've been enslaved by the dems at least since the sixties when LBJ initiated his great society enslavement program. At least back when blacks were compounded as slaves in the South--they had 3 square meals a day, a roof over their head, none of them turned into crack heads and junkies and none of them spent the rest of their lives in a federal prison and they felt what it was like to actually work for their keep. You keep on pushing for your big govt nanny to keep the chains tight on these black people and it won't be long before they attack their leftist slave owners. What we see with blacks today who only vote for the democrat to keep them shackled for life is what one might call the black sickness of them to having a variation of the 'Stockholm Syndrome'.

 

Explain to me why the zero liability voter should be allowed to vote.

 

let me see if I understand you correctly, I have to EXPLAIN to you why a CITIZEN should not have the same rights as you because of the color of their skin? What happened to the Constitution? You want to change the Constitution because you don't agree to it now? That really speaks volumes to what your true goal is now...thanks for clearing it up for me.

 

Zero liability voters come in all colors and shades. You must be racist to assume otherwise.

It is you liberals that have changed the Constitution, where a limited government is now a nanny state. Since that has been done in order to correct it we'll have to get rid of the nanny state (preferred) or else prevent its dependents form voting themselves more largess and hence destroying the viability of the country as a whole. Is that what you really want?

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy." Elmer T. Peterson (9 December 1951)

 

I Think the primis is false. Granted the GOP is mostly white but the DNC doesn't represent the black vote, they create plans to buy their vote and keep them dependent on primises that never get fulfilled. If black could not vote the Democracts wouldn't give them the time of day.

 

you can deflect all you want, you know full well what Libhater said, you defended it, now you want to deflect...don't try to be dishonest.

 

does Elmer have a whole host of previous examples of democracies reverting to monarchies, I wonder?

 

nothing yet?...hmmm