New Trayvon Martin Pics

You are still leaving out a whole bunch of stuff...I wonder why?

 

George's delusions were the only thing suspicious about Trayvon that night.. George was acting suspiciously..

 

There was no foot pursuit. We've already established that.

 

i wonder what dee dee and trayvon were arguing about all day long?



- - - Updated - - -

nah, you are wrong.

 

Um, what does that rant have to do with my post?

 

you need to read the statute....you are wrong.

 

So, when a cop stops someone that they think maybe a robber, if the suspect puts their hand in their pocket, the cop can blow their head off?

 

You have not proven that the pics are legit. M'OM may be just stupid enough to present some bogus (*)(*)(*)(*) that the Nazis posted to the web.

Have you posted an explanation of what happened to Martin's tattoos and scar? I missed it if you did.

You have to explain that before you expect a jury of rational adults to believe that the pics are real.

 

that is lefty logic where regular laws don't apply to blacks.

 

I thought they "always got away"? How could he have been wrong, if the police never caught up with them?

Remember, GZ neighborhood had a series of burglaries. The suspects that were seen were all black males.

 

Sometimes they do, actually. They really need to do it more often when confronted by a frothing-at-the-mouth lunatic.

I would have smoked Z.

 

And IF you had returned and confronted George you would be guilty of murder.

 

Yes.. if a cop thought you were reaching for a gun.. he would shoot you.

 

Only a dimwit believes that.

 

Oh, so being on the ground with someone on top of your is justification for murder? GZ provoked a fight might have been loosing and on the ground in a fight he provoked... so what. That is not grounds for killing someone. All you gun nuts seem to think that bringing a gun to a fist fight is quite alright and it is fine to open up with deadly force if you get a bloody nose in that fight. Especially if the guy winning has a picture of him smoking weed on his phone. Hell you guys have such stupid arguments that you think an old picture of the Martin holding a gun makes a difference, but Zimmerman holding a gun in the fight and using it to kill is fine. We will see what a jury decides. What you think means nothing.

 

New Travon Martin Pic's ~ Thread # 2


http://www.politicalforum.com/current-events/304513-new-travon-martin-pic-2-a.html


**hope you guys don't mind**

 

That's interestign. So is the cell phone ping putting TM far away from the 7-11. I wonder what he was up to?

 

This Thread needs to be closed.The only thing I'm geting is Bored.
I'd be more entertaining watching a barrelful of monkeys audition for
dat Kardashian Show.

 

Is the guy in this picture in justifiable fear of his life? According to your arguments, that means that every cop in the building should be opening up with deadly force to kill the guy on top in the picture. If this is not true, then Zimmerman is not justified to use deadly force either. All stand your ground means is that if you feel a threat to your life, you can shoot instead of run. For example if someone pulls a gun on you, you can shoot instead of run. But Zimmerman had no justifiable fear for his life any more than if the guy on the bottom of your picture whipped out a gun and shot the guy on top. I mean would think if the guy on the bottom in your picture whipped out a gun and blew the head off the guy on top in the MMA ring, that he should not be charged?

 

So, NYPD's shooting of Amadou Diallo was completely justified to you? Then, why did Rev. Al and Jesse Jackson get so upset by a good shoot?

- - - Updated - - -

I didn't say anything about a gun or puling an object out. Lefty is saying that merely putting your hand into your pocket gives people the right to kill you.

 

That's crazy talk. Thanks for the chuckles.

What are you talking about?

 

It happens too frequently.. but cops are held accountable when the kill someone under such circumstances.

 

No rational person is going to believe that those pics are actually of Martin unless you account for the scar and tattoos.

 

Time out. You are asking me to justify murder. You can't do that. I can speak of a right to self-defense, which can be a lawful homicide.

There is no evidence that GZ did anything more than walk away from his vehicle. As much as that upsets the GZ-haters, he was will within his legal rights to do so.

The grounds for GZ killing TM was GZ's fear of losing his life or suffering great bodily harm. That is the legal standard. A stranger sucker-punching someone and then subjecting them to a sustained beating on the ground in the dark could certainly put a lone reasonable person in such a state of fear. The person being assaulted does not have to wait until they suffer great bodily harm or a fatal wound. Why is this so hard to grasp?

That sounds like emotional drivel. This was not a fist fight. GZ was on the ground being beaten. TM had NO facial trauma. So, the question is why do you need to manufacture a fist fight in order to justify what TM did to GZ? You should be ashamed of yourself.

The pictures demolish the image of TM being an angel. Why is it ok for the lynch mob to talk about GZ's past, but it is wrong to show what TM was all about i.e. drugs, guns, violence, and possessing women's jewelry and a burglary tool?