New Trayvon Martin Pics

So you know that there was a landline at the rowhouse?

 

What is he going to do with the can of Ice Tea? Throw it at him? And a flower pot? Seriously? Look around in the dark on other people's porch for a flower pot? Talk about a way to get yourself shot.

If he wanted to know WHY, then he sure as heck wasn't very scared.

 

Here's the deal folks.It's rigged like a really crooked mafia casino.
These Trayvon defenders are just Political operatives.Just ask anyone
of them what they think of Birthers.That's the telltale.
They are here to stir up rancor and cause confusion.
For all I know some may be working for Commies like John Podesta.
Who seems harmless enough.But thereagain so did Joseph Goebbels.
Keep that in mind.Goebbels was a smallish,almost bookworm like
German.Yet his mindset was anything but.

 

Yeah, I can see that...just because he's thug drug dealing gun wielding punk has no bearing on his state of mind.

 

That is so funny!

You mean to tell me that if people do not approve or do not take birthers seriously, they are "political operatives?"
Do you realize that you are basically making the connection that people who do not support Zimmerman are "anti-birthers," and that therefore, those who support Zimmerman are "birthers sympathizers?"

And that is suppose to give the Zimbots some "credibility?"

I can't believe ANYONE would be stupid enough to even THINK that way!

You're joking, right?

 

I'm not making up anything.

If you aren't deaf you can hear George running when he says: Sheet he's running.

That's why the dispatcher asks George if he's following Trayvon and after George answers in the affirmative the dispatcher tells him that he doesn't need him to do it.

What's more interesting is that some claim that the dispatcher had asked George to keep an eye on Trayvon. If that's so then why was the last subject George and dispatcher talked about was where he wanted the police to meet him and why did he not update the dispatcher on Trayvon's location?

You can live in denial if want but George will still be convicted.

 

ROTFLMAO!!

That's such sad explanation.

O'Mara didn't want his client speaking before the trial?

Kinda like O'Mara wanted George to testify at the second bond hearing without being cross-examined?

Why is O'Mara so afraid to have George speak?

Could it be because George is a terrible liar as we found out during the first bond hearing?

I am not going to do your research for you.

Your excuses as to why George waived his right to the immunity hearing are sad and desperate.

If I were George and if I were being railroaded as he and his fans claim I would jump at the chance to tell my side of the story and expose this supposed conspiracy against me.

But he won't because it's not a conspiracy. The State has more than enough evidence to convict George of Murder 2 and that's the reason that O'Mara continues to request delays---because he knows once the State's evidence is presented his client will never be free again.

 

The very fact that you wasted no time in replying is abject guilt.
I can detest y'all from afoot and afar.
You people leave a trail like a rabbit leaves their pellet poop.

 

Why don't you give it up.

All of the excuses that George made--'going in the same direction as Trayvon' and 'looking for an address' and never giving the dispatcher an address will reflect badly on him and juries will understand that George was the one up to no good that night.

But keep believing in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus if it helps you sleep better at night.

 

When a teenage boy becomes excited or scared his voice 'cracks'. Adult voices don't so I doubt that George's voice sounded anything like a teenager's that night.

Plus I have heard George's attempt to yell/scream for help and it's not even close to the screams on the 911 tape. But let's allow the jury to decide.

Oh that's right O'Mara doesn't want them to hear the 911 screams at all so they can make their own decision.

I guess he's not too confident that the jury will believe that it's his client.

 

If George wasn't up to no good then why did he lie about the reason he left his truck?

First he was looking for an address. Then he was just going in the same direction as Trayvon.

I am sure the jury will realize that George was the one with sinister motives that night that ended when he confronted Trayvon, tried to detain him and ended up killing him after he realized that Trayvon wasn't the thief he believed he was.

Yeah good old Frank Taaffe told us if Trayvon had just answered George's questions nothing would have happened.

 

ROTFLMAO

Trayvon's body was 70 feet from the apartment he was staying and 400 feet from where George's truck was probably parked.

If you look at the map George would have had to have traveled behind several townhouses to where Trayvon was killed so your lie about Trayvon ambushing George is like everything else that the Zimbots claim--not based on evidence.

 

That actually isn't true. TM's body was only about 200 feet from where GZ left his vehicle and about 400 feet from the apartment. You can measure it on Google Earth and there are plenty of pictures online to show where the apartment is and where GZ's vehicle, and TM's body were found.

After the encounter at GZ's vehicle, TM only had about 600 feet to the apartment and a good head start on GZ.

 

Uh-huh; because all human voices have the same characteristics, and no adult voices ever "crack"....

 

Well golly undisputed debating champion.... I am sure you are just that great in your own mind.... I mean, obviously Trayvon was a guy who was just looking for trouble and jumped George out of nowhere..... not. And by lawfully defending their self, you mean killing someone because you are a delusional cop wanna be who has no injuries anywhere near life threatening from a fight you are loosing, then sure. But the confusion seems to be your idea that getting a bloody nose in a fight gives one the right to shoot the other guy to death.

 

Not if pig boy ran down to the next cut-through to head him off.

Why was Martin's phone so far south of both his body and where fatty said the fight started?

 

Damn he could play football for UF

 

If forensics show Martin was on top of Zimmerman MMA "ground and pound" style................



preventing Zimmerman's escape, it's a clean shoot and Z will be acquitted. Forensics will show their exact body positions.

 

I have worked private security on an apartment complex We advised women who thought they were being followed by a rapist not to go straight to their doors, but to the nearest fire alarm, and if the rapist tried to grab them, pull the lever.

If they catch you opening the door, they shove you inside and close the door and only the most alert and caring neighbors are likely to think anything amiss or do anything about it.

Pull the fire alarm and EVERYBODY comes out to see what is going on.

 

Only if you can prove that the crap that M'OM has is legit.

I still don't think that the thug's ears or cheekbones look right, and I want to know what happened to Martin's scar and tattoos in M'OM's package.

- - - Updated - - -

Would you like to explain now how fat boy was able to draw his weapon in that position?

 

So we think that Orly, and the Donald and that fat pig in Maricopa county are lunatics. Got a point?

 

totally un-called-for smarm.

If a birfer ever came into contact with reality he would short it out.

 

Got proof that he came back? Wouldn't fat boy have had time to notice somebody that tall running toward him? Are you admitting that the little piggy is a drooling moron and so unaware of his surroundings that his testimony is to be questioned?

 

There is still at least one person that believes you have to have injuries, and life threatening ones at that, before you defend yourself?

Amazing.

Having injuries before you defend yourself totally defeats the purpose of defending yourself wouldn't it Mr. Driver?

776.012 Use of force in defense of person.—A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or

Curious, absolutely no wording that relates to the person defending themselves as to already needing to have injuries.