Let’s Get This Class War Started

I'm beginning to get the impression that you never actually have anything of value to add to any conversation, do you?

- - - Updated - - -

More evidence of my conclusion....

 

And yet I used it. Sucks to be you, and your dumb false arguments.

- - - Updated - - -

Put him on Ignore. I did a long time ago. Save yourself a waste of time reading his crap.

 

It is about the poverty inducing effect of unemployment in our form of capital economy; employers may only claim to be discomfited by having to hire everyone that applies and only firing them if they don't work out.

 

The class war has existed since agriculture was invented and thieves could threaten and steal from farmers, making themselves lords. It will continue until we get our property back.

 

How do you account for eminent domain and that form of socialism disguised as a capital program in our republic?

 

With difficulty, because I am unfamiliar with the term 'eminent domain'. No-one uses it here.

 

The relevant part from our 5th Amendment:

 

There is no 'private property' that has not been stolen from the public, surely? Where could it come from?

 

It may depend on how that applies; infrastructure wasn't "stolen" from the public; and, a respect for rights in private property is part of our republican form of Government.

 

I thought infrastructure was public property, like roads and such.

 

So, how could property commuted public, be stolen?

 

Don't understand. The capitalist thieves sell our work on the market and only give us part of the price, stealing the rest, as you know. They are always full of complex 'law', because they have no right to anything.

 

Our capital program under our form of socialism claims to preclude forms of thievery: nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 

That Lithuanian? Your working class in control, is it? You could have fooled me, kid - I thought the Brahmin 1% owned your very balls!

 

I believe a capital program may be more appropriate with our form of government.

 

That would be the normal pattern.

No, you aren't. You can't even address the simple issue of rich, greedy parasites getting rapidly richer without effort or contribution of any kind. You have to evade it by falsely and dishonestly calling it an "argument from spite." It is a fact. Address it, or admit that you can't debate the issues.

LOL! How long will it take you to accuse me of being a socialist, a thief, or just envious? The "argument from spite" nonsense was getting pretty warm.

 

It was their ownership of the land that enabled them to steal from the farmers.

There is a difference between a thief and a landlord: government is on the landlord's side, and says the land is his property.

 

Think whatever you wish.

Henceforth, I shall treat you precisely as I do all other trolls and flamebaiters: Which is to say, I am putting you on Ignore.

Now, you may rant to your heart's content, in the hope that your rants may (somehow) impress others...

 

anyone want to follow up on merely goading the wealthiest to insist their public servants simply purchase the finest solutions money can buy, with an official Mint at their disposal.

 

I believe we should also insist our wealthier, elected representatives to our federal Congress fix a Standard regarding shining cities on shining hills, for the several States to emulate as best fits their needs.

 

Apparently, that privilege and immunity can be revoked under our form of socialism, through eminent domain.

 

<<<MOD EDIT: Reply to deleted post>>>

- - - Updated - - -

But with compensation. Which means the landowner still has a privilege, but the landless do not have even their rights.

 

Actually, the American Revolution provided a big spark to the French Revolution, partially because the French monarchs spent too much of the country's treasure on the American Revolution. Obviously, neither the French people nor the American people cared much for kings and queens. Personally, I hate 'em and anything that smells of 'em, and if I have to take a little bit of an economic setback after getting rid of them, I'm still all for it.

So, are you a Tory? Should we have passed on our own revolution or hanged the instigators before it really got rolling? Did the French Revolution not turn out the way you would have liked it to?

 

I am willing to vote along party lines, for the party that is willing to end the drug war, and simple poverty in our republic, and get us into fusion power within two terms.

 

we don't need a Class War.

we simply need better corporate and business regulations so that the folks who make the stuff and do the work that make folks rich, get a better share of their profits and share in the prosperity.

other nations do this, why can't we?