World Implications if NASA Finally Admits to Life on Mars

Believing is seeing. That's how the human capacity for pattern recognition (sadly including false positives) gets sorely abused in cases such as this.

 

That's also like doomsayers predicting the end of the world on this or that date due to this or that outlandish cause. The day comes, some dopes are actually surprised that the prediction in question was wrong, and the dope(s) making the claim in the first place simply change(s) the story and keep(s) it going.

I wonder if some at least of these people are genuine psychopaths... They have a capacity (and practically a need) to lie like that, to mislead and abuse other people. They're known to simply change their story, and do so without so much as batting an eye, when their lies are uncovered.

 

There is no such thing as PAREIDOLIA . If you try and find it in medical literature ,they cite 4 experiments that were done ,but none of them proved it exists. The word was coined and first used by Stephen Goldstein a writer for SKEPTICAL ENQUIRER. There is no mention of the word before the mid 90'sThere is, however , a real condition called
Prosopagnosia (Greek: "prosopon" = "face", "agnosia" = "not knowing"), also called face blindness, is a disorder of face perception where the ability to recognize faces is impaired, while other aspects of visual processing (e.g., object discrimination) and intellectual functioning (e.g., decision making) remain intact. The term originally referred to a condition following acute brain damage (acquired prosopagnosia), but a congenital or developmental form of the disorder also exists, which may affect up to 2.5% of the population.[1] The specific brain area usually associated with prosopagnosia is the fusiform gyrus,[2] which activates specifically in response to faces. Thanks to this specialization, most people recognize faces much more effectively than they do similarly complex inanimate objects. For those with prosopagnosia, the ability to recognize faces depends on the less-sensitive object recognition system.

Even if there were such a thing then everyone on the planet has it ,because anybody that can't see that statue is made by an intelligent life form has got a problem no doctor can diagnose

 

Sorry, you're losing this argument ,but anyone on the planet can see that statue ON POST# 321 has been made by an intelligent life form. WINNING !!!!!!!!

 

No. Copy and paste evidence. You make extraordinary claims, and they require extraordinary evidence.

 

I wonder about, what are people' s agendas that keep denying undeniable evidence, that anyone the planet can clearly see. It's beyond all comprehension. Are they part of the cover up
or are they afraid to admit, just like the Brookings Report said, "The existence of extraterrestrial life must be covered up because the majority of society wouldn't be able to handle it and the ramifications of such knowledge would be unpredictable".

 

When I doubt someone's data I do extraordinary research on my own to check out their claims even if they do provide evidence. I don't need to be spoon fed every possible bit of data
because I realize a person isn't writing his or hers doctoral thesis here on a two bit political forum. The objective is to inform and spur people to do further investigation on their own and I am confident when they do that the vast majority will have no choice but to agree with my assertions. They in turn will tell someone else and eventually millions of people will know the truth and as public pressure mounts the people lying to us will be forced to tell the truth !!!!!!!

T

 

The evidence presented is far from being "undeniable," given its highly dubious nature. You're also ignoring vast amounts of evidence against your conclusions, and that's the real tragedy in it.

- - - Updated - - -

Lul. Sure you do.

 

Just give it up. your B. S. arguments are getting boring. Anyone who looks up anomalies on Mars and watches people doing detailed analysis on photo's anyone on the planet can download and see the exact same things will be convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt including your so called experts, if they don't THEY ARE LIARS !!!!!!

 

The thread was , although there wasn't space, I know the evidence exists and my question was what are the implications to the rest of the world when NASA finally admits it to the world. Implications to the rest of the world, religious, economic, political, and social impacts. It was all you deniers that chose to attack my initial assertion instead of addressing my thread premise. This thread is right where it should be , because I don't have to prove my claims they are assumed and as far as I'm concerned already proven for the purposes of this thread .




admits

 

You guys are getting trolled so hard.

 

Sorry but even Wiki has an entry on pareidolia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia

 

Sorry but all the rest of us only see some shadowing on some rocks NOT an alien statue

You have yet to convince ONE person on this board

 

Do further research there's no mention of the word before the mid nineties or earlier. It got to being used by people like you, but no one in the medical field had even heard of it before that. there's been no studies that proved it's real.

 

shadowing. Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.yeah right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

The broader term is apophany or apophenia, credited to German neurologist and psychiatrist Klaus Conrad in his work on early psychotic phases of schizophrenia. By what ever term we use, it is, as we see here an observed and real phenomenon.

 

There is NO life on Mars. Period. NASA has in fact been burned in the past jumping to conclusions such as that meteorite they found back in 1998 that they initially said might have fossilized remains of bacteria. It turned out to not be true and yet NASA still runs around constantly talking about finding life on Mars in order to seem relevant. The US Military actually has more space launches than NASA does these days. Mars does not have a EM field like the Earth so the surface is exposed to radiation constantly. There is virtually no atmosphere and all the water is frozen. Giant dust storms can cover most of the surface of Mars and last for days if not weeks thus ruling out any photosynthetic lifeforms entirely.

THERE IS NO LIFE ON MARS.

 

Yeah, That's your story and you're stickin too it . There are none so blind that refuse to see!!!!!! There's evidence of running water and plant life AND HUMANOID LIFE. The pressure is building every day . it's just a matter of time before they come clean. Do you really think we're spending billions of dollars and about to spend billions more just to look at a bunch of dam rocks. Nobody can be that ignorant , OH wait , I guess there can there's a bunch of them on this forum. Goodnight all.

 

You sound like a cult leader. Just believe in something enough and it must be true. To hell with scientific facts and basic chemistry and biology be damned.

 

What part of a near airless, high radiation precious little running water and freezing sodding cold - (as in beyond the balls and the brass monkey cold) are you not including in your hypothesis about humanoid life.

IF and only IF there were humanoid life it would show up as hot spots on the surface of the planet - this we could measure easily from Earth

Humanoid life on Mars would have more things to worry about than statue building

 

[ctrl+c] your link, then [ctrl+v] here.

If I'm not mistaken (show I am by posting the links), this seems like a really obvious dodge, no offense.

 

Astronomers and astrophysicists deal in facts. Clearly that is a problem for you since you don't want your 'trees' ridiculed by those who actually know something about the subject in question.

There is not one iota of fact, logic or truth in your claims. I can look at a cloud formation and see a 'dog'. Doesn't mean it's actually a dog. Perhaps you should bear that in mind.