It's the same thing when homosexuals get compared to pedophiliac organizations like NAMBLA, who are a part of the gay rights movement thanks in large part to gay activists like Harry Hay who promoted man-boy love as a part of gay love. Gays get embarrassed when they have to share the same side of the tracks as pedophiles, and continually try to deny that they are in the same boat with them. You reap what you sow.
Bill Maher donated one million dollars to Barack Obama's re-election campaign and Ed Schultz is a tv personality on a left wing propaganda network. You're embarrassing yourself here because you're too proud to admit that I called you out on your silly partisan double standards. Just admit that you hate women unless you can tell them how to vote.
What a pathetic shriveled flaccid excuse of a response, followed by - wait for it - the king of hypocrisy of responses: So let's summarize your abject hypocrisy. You excuse Maher, Schultz and Louis CK...because they aren't directly involved in politics. Then - in the very next breath! - you condemn PF posters who aren't 'directly involved in politics' for what they say. Shove it in your balloon knot, Pardy. :321:
The OP kinda left out the facts that Davis abandon her kids, and is a liar. The fact that she support the killing of unborn babies is bad enough.
Everyone got their own rationale which gives them the right to degrade woman. For example, this is logical1's.
Hardly.. When one woman does something wrong and you point it out its not an attack on Women. I suggest you learn the difference between the word Woman and Women.
Again, try again and pay attention to this threads topic. Reread the original post if you must and then reread the comment to which I was responding. Then understand that the comment is suggest that by referencing " the facts that Davis abandon her kids, and is a liar. The fact that she support the killing of unborn babies is bad enough" plays some role and has anything to do with the degrading comments made about this woman. As if somehow, even as bogus as his claims are, it would somehow make the comments cited in the OP less degrading and somewhat justified.
She did abandon her kids and she does support Abortion. Bury your head in the sand if you like but those facts remain.
[video]http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2013/12/martin-bashirs-sarah-palin-comment.html[/video] This will be my go to card for quite some time for liberals who bring up hateful things said by conservatives.
Here are some quotes from Kincannon's tweets that pass this site's smut filter: "Wendy Davis stimulates the kneepad economy. And a lot of penises." "Wendy Davis has solved America's student loan crisis! Just find a dumbass to pay off your loans in exchange for sex." In other news, Wendy Davis took a short break from blowing 'campaign contributors' today to condemn remarks made by Mike Huckabee... Wendy Davis is a looker and a hooker
It seems she leeched off a man for her college. What does that make her? She lost her kids due to her drug and drinking habits. What does that make her? Here is the thing smallblue if you dont want to be insulted dont do despicable things. She is getting called out for her actions. Its that simple. Its hardly an attack on Women to point that out. ( Hint Women is plural)
Her actions... Something you just want to ignore or hide from. I will say it again her actions were despicable. If you cant handle that... Tough.
Its blatant that you dont want to discuss her ( the topic of the thread ) and instead want to be snarky with posters. Her ACTIONS degrade her not commenting on them.
This is the topic: Here are some quotes from Kincannon's tweets that pass this site's smut filter: "Wendy Davis stimulates the kneepad economy. And a lot of penises." "Wendy Davis has solved America's student loan crisis! Just find a dumbass to pay off your loans in exchange for sex." In other news, Wendy Davis took a short break from blowing 'campaign contributors' today to condemn remarks made by Mike Huckabee... Wendy Davis is a looker and a hooker And you are giving me your rationale for why these comments, which are degrading to women, are justified. Don't worry, I get what your saying.
They might be "degrading" to her ( based on her actions i would say no) but she Wendy Davis does not represent Women any more then I ( whom you are being snarky with and cute little insults) represent all Independents. Now would you like to talk about her past or attack me more? Be honest. Stop wasting my time.
Well, I have no control over how you choose to spend you time. You've clearly made your case for why you think these degrading comments are justified. I'll quote someone I know very well:
You obviously didn't read the context. Sarah Palin and Todd Kincannon (the people I was discussing) are directly involved in Politics. Lewis CK is not. Before you jump into a conversation and start screaming, maybe you should take a minute to look at the context. #rightwingaggression - - - Updated - - - Yeah, your right. Bill Maher is more involved in politics than Sarah Palin or Todd Kincannon.
I wonder if you - subconsciously - couldn't actually write the word 'women', you had to write WOMAN. That - in case you and your subconscious are not on speaking terms - means that you implicitly understand that logical1 wasn't degrading women; he was degrading a WOMAN. THIS woman. And she deserves to be degraded. But send an email to your subconscious. She clearly knows more than you.