Disney to pull funding from Boy Scouts if they don't allow Homosexual leaders

You're being disgusting and you know it. Are you only able to criticize liberals through asinine exaggerations? Doesn't bode well for your credibility.

 

Then why would someone identify as such? Those identifiers have a meaning. It's like identifying as a Vegetarian and have some one tell you youre ignorant for assuming they dont eat meat. Better still, if identifiers like that dont automatically convey a meaning....why dont they all just avoid the stigma by identifying as straight? What is the point of LBGTQWTF at all?

- - - Updated - - -

You're right, hence why I hope others can fill the void of funding and they can tell Disney to walk.

 

For me the ideal outcome would be for the Boy Scout's to stop being dumb about it, but if they won't do that, what you said here is the next best thing because it respects both Disney and the Boy Scout's right to choose for themselves.

 

Then I have no problem with that.

That's commons sense.

 

Gay marriage has been legal for a decade.

Cite one case where gays marrying or gay rights was used to justify pedophilia, bestiality, or polygamy.

 

You keep using that word...I do not think it means what you think it does.

Deviant: a negative connotation, usually meaning something harmful, hurtful, violent, ect.

Deviating: means breaking away from the norm.

Maybe you don't know the difference between the words, maybe you do and choose to try to paints gays a deviants.

 

At times in my boat I deviate from my intended course. For some reason, the homosexual movement is trying to portray the correct use of the word as being a bad thing. It is "abnormal" for a man to place his penis into the mouth of another man. It is abnormal for a dog not to bark. Heck, the moment even tried to coin its own word by incorrectly using the term "phobia"

 

If you could retract your claws you will find that most "opposition" within this thread is simply parents being consistent. We are equally suspicious of men wanting to be around little girls as we are of homosexual men wanting to be around little boys.

 

I thought about murdering someone but never did it, am I still a murderer?

homosexuals engage in homosexual sex. Also, your 3.4% poll you cited (same as the poll I found) is for the entire alternative alphabet soup, not just homosexual. So, it includes LGBTQRSTUVWXY and Z

edit: please note that despite your insults, I do not report posts. I've found that the moderators in this forum give a huge leeway to homosexuals so your insults are no doubt allowed, if not encouraged by the staff.

 

and 25 years before that homosexuality was a mental disorder worthy of locking people up in mental institutions....

Progressives have championed homosexuality from a mental disorder, not unlike pedophilia, to what it is today, the apparent preferred life style choice.

Progressives will never stop moving "forward"

 

that's utter crap and what sets up for failure.

Should the diaper of granny be checked by TSA agents or should they focus on young male Muslims?

If organizations don't set policies in place to scrutinize certain groups then the children could be at risk.

The majority of sexual predators are male so if you have a choice, you don't put child-less males with little girls or child-less homosexual males with little boys.

You never never never put a child at risk in the name of political correctness

 

exactly

if you remove the emotional stake from the debate, and look at it in a logical manner, it makes no sense where we've come.

If there is absolutely zero medical test to prove that one is born heterosexual or born homosexual, then it must be some form of choice or mental "incorrect wiring"

Since it requires a male and female to procreate then an argument could be made that heterosexuality is by birth and anything else is wrong. I don't subscribe the "born heterosexual" theory.

In any event, to choose homosexuality or to be "wired wrong" mentally should be viewed as a mental disorder. It does not mean it's anything harmful or evil.

Does the person who is obsessed with exercise, or speeding in their car, need to be "put away"? Absolutely not but a case could be made that there is something mentally wrong with them

 

The whole concept of marriage is based on procreation.

 

Absolutely agree with the second part of the quote up there.
Regarding the first: Political correctness has absolutely no part in this. Even if I pretend to agree with your explanation of "abusers of boys want sex with male kids, therefore they must be gay", I still have to point out one thing: You will not be able to identify a man who preys on boys as such. He will not "act gay", he will not say that he's gay.
The only right thing to do is keep adults you can not trust 100% away from kids, be it boys or girls.

I know we've been over this before, but I'm not giving up on you

 

Good catch! Conservatives take precautions. Progressives can't even spell the word properly.

 

To add on to your "consistency" point from earlier, it stands to reason that if someone engages in deviant sexual behavior as a part of their lifestyle, then they should not be trusted to teach core values and beliefs around young children. Common sense rules the day here.

 

The American Psychiatric Association recently inserted a...*ahem* "typo" into the latest volume of the DSM manual, which is the book upon which all mental disorder diagnoses are based. This "typo" listed pedophilia as a sexual orientation. The "typo" subsequently had to be corrected after multiple sources in the field caught it and called the APA on their crap. So the progressives are indeed working toward that goal; doing it subliminally in much the same way as they did when they managed to get homosexuality taken off the DSM list of mental disorders in 1974.

 

Ive seen other "typos" recently, like the one that gave illegal aliens free obamacare

 

Admiral Ozzel came out of lightspeed too close to the system lol....

For non Star Wars geeks, looks like someone jumped the gun on their plans. Disgusting.

 

Thats progressives for ya...

 

That is what BSA guidelines require. The ideal is at least two leaders with at least two scouts. Also permissible, one leader with multiple scouts (limited conditions, such as car trips or merit badge work), or multiple leaders with one scout.

I'm a Scout leader. I have three comments on the issue about gay scout leaders:
1) not a big deal, because of the low number of gays.
2) Make this issue up to units, not a national council decision. Let each unit (and their sponsor) decide if they want to have or not have gay scout leaders.
3) As long as Youth Protection rules are followed, there is no real problem of abuse.

- - - Updated - - -

Do you know that for a fact? Do you know that he never slept with an adult male?

 

Yes, they do. Lesbian and gay (and straight for that matter) have meanings (in this context) referring to the gender of people you are emotionally, romantically and sexually attracted to. They don't have any meaning referring to any specific sexual acts, "deviant" or otherwise. Transgender and transsexual are even further away from that concept.

Sec knows this already but he continues to repeat his lies about it. I've just decided not to let him brush them aside this time.

 

Someone like yourself, who I'd guess has a knowledge of the Bible and Christian beliefs no greater than that of a 10 year old in Sunday School, should not attempt to argue about who as an anti-Christian, and who isn't.

Just because someone or some organization says they are Christian does not make them so. Obviously Barak Obama, Rev J. Wright, the Westborough Baptist Church, Rev Jim Jones and People's Temple and the Presbyterian Church USA are all examples of those who condem the moral laws and teachings of Christ.

I would call a Buddist who condems the teachings of his faith an anti-Buddist. Same thing for an Marxist who condems Marx. Ditto for faux Christians.

Right after Christ gave his sermon on the mount, with "love thy neighbor" he said of all the moral laws in the Old Testament that dealth with murder, rape, homosexuality, beastiality and so on:

17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

Matt 5:17-20.

Tons of Christian Liberals can go ahead and drop the Christian part. They are intolerant and evil and just plain wrong.

 

That's a weak comparison. A better comparison would be asking if the Girl Scouts should be forced to have lesbians go on unsupervised overnights with the girls, but wait...they already do.

 

Nope. Murder describes a specific action, not a characteristic.

If 80% of people identify as Christian, does that mean the all go to church on Sunday morning?

Many do, some don't, just like heterosexuals.

Consider a boy and a girl fall in love in high school, going out for dinner and dances, kissing passionately as they express their eternal love for each other. They're good Christians though and pledge not to have sex until they're married. Are you saying that they're not heterosexual until their inevitable wedding-night let down? Is the concept of romantic love so alien to you?

Nope, it included LGBT, as per the question in the Gallup poll. You make a valid point that different people interpret that term in quite different ways, making it difficult to honestly say what the 3.4% who said yes (or the 92.2% who said know) actually feel, let alone what they actually do about it. That doesn't stop you making something up.

I'm not homosexual though, so maybe you should give it a go (though it's been a while so maybe by your system I'm asexual again?).