Selective Outrage when It Comes to Racism

Heh, I always laugh at the faux outrage right wingers pretend to have when a black person calls a conservative black an Uncle Tom. These same idiots are the first to call any white person who voted for Obama or who rejects conservatism a "self loathing white". Just goes to show what hypocrites these clowns are.

- - - Updated - - -

Actually, the president was asked a question and answered. Unlike your messiah, who specifically chose a location where three civil rights workers were murdered and told an all white audience that he believed in states rights.

What do you have to say about that?

 

Thank you for the compliment not sure I qualify but I try to raise myself higher to educate my children. My parents were simple country follks that moved to the city to make a living. When the "white" flight took place we stayed put so I was a young redneck in the inner-city. My peers thought we were rich because we had lots of food in the house.

My personal experiences of the name being used were in the late 80's and in 2008. Both times it was explained to me as basically being too uppity and acting white. That a uncle Tom was the head slave that was trusted by the master even to the point of watching the "white" children. I gave that explanation to a "black" poster when I began to talk on this subject and he said I had no idea what I was talking about and after research he was correct. However that was how I had seen it used, of course the people who explained it to me were proud too be hood and gangsters. So not the best place for correct terminology in hindsight. I was not aware that middle and upperclass "black" people used the term because I thought they were who it refered.

I still think the more mature and intelligent way would be to just point out the ways they feel he has hurt the interest of "black" people. I found it more offensive to be used at a supreme court justice because I do not believe someone in that position should consider what is this going to do to my people. He is supposed to interpret the constitution and make a decsion based on what it says. I feel that way about every justice on every issue. Their job is not to make laws or policy only to interpret. Justice should be blind even though I am sure most minority or any lower class individual does not think it is so blind when they go before a judge.

 

So the president answers all questions when it comes to starting race fires but refuses to answer any questions on (pick a scandal and insert here)? Interesting.
Also I don't have a messiah can you be more specific if you are trying to put words in my mouth?
And why is it a "white audience" in your thoughts as opposed to just an "audience"?
Lastly all Presidents believe in "states rights".

 

If your comments enable discrimination then its racist. The FACT is that leftists are actually in favour of discrimination. They do not want a race blind society.

 

I am pretty sure you haven't because racism doesn't exist in your eyes.

A lot of white culture is self-destructive also, no one has ever said that?

Where is your head at? Pull real hard and I guarantee you, you will breath better after you hear the pop.

- - - Updated - - -

I tell you its truly amazing.

Hypocrites is putting it mildly.

 

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...mae-martin-clarence-thomas-welfare-programs/3

Actually, Emma Lou had the opportunity to attend the same Catholic school in Savannah that her brothers did, and in fact did attend for a while. It was she who decided she didn't like city life and went back home, giving up that opportunity to attend a better school.

In the summer before her 12th grade year, she got pregnant and had to drop out of school. She got married at 21, and started to get her diploma, but then she got pregnant again...and then again. She admits that her aunt would have found the money for her to go to college, but Emma said she didn't want to continue with her schooling. She ended up walking out on her husband and going on welfare.

Yes, she went to take care of her aging aunt, but she also gave birth to another illegitimate child at that time as well.

At the time this article was written, in 1991....Her son Mark, 22, had quit his job, but Emma said "my baby will not go and stand in anybody`s unemployment line." His girlfriend also lived with them at Emma's house she inherited from the aunt, and the girlfriend was expecting a baby.

Her daughter, 20, was laid off from her job and was also expecting a baby and living there.

Emma Lou was supporting them all, at the age of 44.

So you see, Emma's choices determined her outcome. Taking care of her ill aunt was not what caused her to go on welfare. She went on welfare after having an illegitimate child, marrying an ass, and having two more children with him. She further chose to not go to college, where she would have gained the credentials to earn a sufficient living. Additionally, she had another illegitimate child. She has passed on the acceptance of having illegitimate children when the parents cannot support them, to at least two of her children.

Sounds like Clarence was right in chastising her.

 

Its amazing how folks will try and continue a lie.

Now what freakin coward would chastise his sister for quitting her job and taking care of an aunt that required 24hr care. Now notice nowhere in this story do you see where he stepped in and help provide care for this bed ridden aunt.

 

Well, sugar...it looks like we have a dispute between the Chicago Tribune and the New York Times, doesn't it? You didn't read the link to the Chicago Tribune story I provided with my response, did you?

 

For the sake of argument how many women get caught in bad marriages?

Please explain to me why a sister that quits a job to take care of a bed ridden aunt deserves ridicule.

Now after the aunt passed away the sister went back to work on a job that required she be there at 3am, now where was the good judge during this time frame?

 

Hmmmm, really. Do you ever look at some of your own posts?

 

I don't think racism means the same to them as it means to the rest of the world.

Calling a black man (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) to them isn't racist. But, saying "Santa or Jesus are not white" is.......

 

Funny how that works, kind of like the arguement of black guys call each other that why can't I say it.

 

No you demanded he be found guilty even though it was completely obvious that there was not sufficient evidence. Y0ou want special rights for Black people that white people cannot exercise.

You are welcome to find me a post of mine that is racist.

 

Remember a couple of facts.

1) Not Guilty =/= Innocent

2) There is virtually no question that Zimmerman is a racist as he racially stereotyped Martin as a person in the neighborhood for nefarious criminal purposes as reflected by his statement to the dispatcher (from memory), "These (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s always get away with it" (i.e. referring to young black men). This could not be adjudicated in a State Court because it is not a state crime to racially stereotype a person in Florida but it is a federal crime. Racial stereotyping that leads to death is a violation of the "Right to Life" and is a criminal civil rights offense under federal law. This could and should have been prosecuted by the US DOJ and I'm surprised that it hasn't been.

 

No, I wanted to know how he gunned down a kid who was doing nothing wrong and why it took a nation demanding for Justice before this guy was arrested and a real investigation was started.

Really give me a list of the special rights I want for black folks.

Likewise.

 

A racist thread created by "Sab": http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=302500

Took me less than 10 seconds to find.

I've noticed that all of the racist conservatives/white nationalists love to call others racist as a defense mechanism. It's a way to justify their own racism and bigotry.

 

Excellent job AH

 

LoL, awesome.

 

Thanks, but he'll probably justify it somehow, or report me to the mods.

Any way, a lot of these racists eventually expose themselves. The mask always slips. They start off pretending to be "fair and balanced" but their true feelings eventually come out. After all, this is the internet where racists can spout off whatever drivel they want to without any repercussions. They know in "real life" if they say the same racist crap they say online, they will be looked upon with disdain by many.

 

When they "out" themselves while "pretending to be fair and balanced" they just create a new screen name and try to re-argue the topic.

 

I see it didn't take you guys long to figure that out.

 

truth is not racism. Black people DO have lower IQs than white people and higher testosterone. Its a fact. An inconvenient fact for the white hating left but a fact all the same. Racism would be HATING black people for their lower IQs and higher testosterone. OR discriminating against all black people as the left discriminates against all white people (other than white leftists of course).

It is inevitable that people with lower IQs and higher testosterone will commit more violent crime and be less successful in a knoweldge based economy. A caring decent government would recognise this and provide help for communities with lower IQ and high testosterone to deal with these problems NOT pretend they don't exist.

It is racist to discriminate. It is not racist to point out the obvious.

 

Well please explain white folks violence which black folks in this country were on the receiving end for centuries. Please explain that for all to read and learn.

 

please explain white folks violence?

White people can certainly be violent they are just NOT as violent as black folks and especially not as violent as descendents of saves who have been bred to have higher evels of testosterone (as well as diseases like hypertension) Indeed it is justifiable that black people could claim that hypertension should be treated by federal funding since it it is a direct result of slavery (its to do with salt retension during transportation)

Essentially testosterone is clearly found at significanty higher levels in black people than white people and testosterone is significantly linked to violent crime (and sportng prowess)

You see I dont blame blck people for their high levels of testosterone. I think helps i sneeded and taxes should pay for it. What is ridicu;ous is the denials that it exists.

 

Your theory is wrong for the simple fact in America history has proven to us that white folks have in fact been more violent than black folks. So does that mean that whites testosterone levels were higher and just went down recently or that your theory doesn't really make much sense.