Pregnant Woman, 3 Others Shot & Killed in Cleveland

You advise "think" when you can't yourself? You don't even have a point... and that's because you can't comment on the entire post.....rave on.....it can't take away the stupidity contained in the OP....

 

Would this be sexual oppression? So race is more important than then a male crime on a woman? I see no difference. Liberals baffle me.

 

Go into more detail about your concept of "pet crimes".... amaze us all

 

There isn't one. Its a conservative fantasy that they use to feel better about themselves.

 

Stupid thing to say.

 

Why would that be? Didn't he claim that if he had a son it would have been like Trayvon Martin? Why not the victim of assault, rape, mutilation and ultimately the murder of this woman.

 

You say he's going to send his DOJ to defend a man who raped and horribly murdered a woman as if the President of the United States would condone or actually approve of such behavior and you wonder why I think it's a stupid thing to say?

Here's a coupon, use it on a clue.

- - - Updated - - -

Yea ,yea, right, right, we all know you're "not racist" you can stop pointing it out now.

 

go ahead, ban the NRA and let's get this civil war going, while i'm still able to participate.

 

IIRC You are already planning on a guerrilla war inside the US and want to kill cops right?

 

You seem pretty upset over this; I'd suggest you write to the President and express your concerns; if you do, let us know his response.

 

Mate, ban all guns in America and I'll doubt you'd see any real difference in murders and slayings. Guns are the tools, the social climate is the reason. America is a social experiment that has failed.

 

Not reverting to turn-of-the-century, totalitarian Progressivism, are you? Come on, Progressives have at least made some advances in that area: they no longer lock ethnic groups up in internment camps and outlaw dissent in times of war.

The standard for sending in the government thugs to break up an organization is rather stringent. That's why groups like NAMBLA still exist. Freedom of association is a fundamental right. Get over yourself.

 

I would not be surprised if he didn't. Playing the race card again?

 

If found guilty I would not have any issues with hanging his arse off an overpass and let the crows pick his bones.

 

Double negative makes your meaning unclear.

No. Playing the common sense card. You may not have seen one before being a conservative.

 

Don't you know a joke when you read it? Some people go all gun-banny whenever there's a multiple shooting. They act as if there had never been any multiple murders until guns were invented.

 

Maybe he can explain it. I'm sure he has a logical point in his statement since he seems to be so certain about it.

 

I'd prefer the State of Utah method.... Shooting him.

 

Just the other day a guy was found innocent after spending 39 years in prison for a murder he didn't commit. Wasn't he lucky his arse wasn't hung off an overpass for the crows to pick his bones?
http://www.cleveland.com/court-just...ackson_leaves_a_life_be.html#incart_most-read

BTW, five people were killed in the Cleveland shooting.
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2014/11/cleveland_quintuple_murder_9-y.html#incart_river

I was speculating that the woman's boyfriend or husband did the shooting since she had sent her daughter into the house to get some clothes. So that was enough to conclude that she had been living there and had moved out and that the shooter was trying to find her. But as yet the cops don't seem to have a clue. They've been busy shooting twelve year-old boys.

 

So...the numbers, the degree of these killings (pregnant women and little children) isn't of a particular concern of the president's? The question was about why Ferguson and not Cleveland? There was no doubt there would have been an investigative report on the Brown shooting as well. But he's been all over Ferguson. Frankly, I think Obama is a lot like Al Sharpton......only interested in the crimes or issues they can make into some kind of racial thing. Just like the black Professor and the police issue back when Obama first became president. That was the first local issue concerning blacks he injected himself in to. The second was Trayvon Martin....and now Michael Brown.

 

We lock up more people than any other country on earth except China.

 

Not upset, just curious why it doesn't seem to be a huge concern of his. I DO feel sorry, however, that all those people being victims in the black-on-black crimes are not a focus or concern of either Holder or Obama.

 

So you can lose again?

 

Which is why I suggested banning the NRA but did not mention banning guns. As far as I can determine the NRA is a major instigator of the culture surrounding and perpetrating the violence in the USA

 

But guns make it so much easier. Correct?