Hillary Clinton's Scandalpalooza Vol I

Examinations of the circumstances of all 13 lethal overseas terrorist attacks under Powell and Rice were not originally political vendettas either. Neither were any of them ever transformed into political vendettas.

"I honestly do not believe this investigation was set up to go after Hillary. I believe it shifted that way".

When and why did it "shift that way"?

As I noted, when it had become apparent that she would be the Democratic candidate for President of the United States.

That's common knowledge, but they'll make Podliska pay for honestly stating it.


"If you think those guys, those Republicans on that panel don't want to bring down Hillary Clinton, you're six years old!" Bill O'Reilly

 

Given that we now know Hillary treats classified information with the respect of used toilet paper, of course the committee has focus on her. She's proven to be unfit to run for POTUS. That's not the question or issue…..

McCarthy's words were twisted by the left to supposedly have said that the Benghazi committee was formed to go after Hillary. Podliska, about as inside of an insider as you can get, says it's ain't so. It's time to stop beating that dead horse.

 

The Hillary haters who have invested so much in the partisan vendetta for so, so long will cling to it, no doubt, but a Republican congressional leader letting it slip that her poll numbers are their metric for its success, and a whistleblower openly admitting that it had become a partisan witch hunt pretty much nails it for rational folks.

As O'Reilly bluntly stated, "If you think those guys, those Republicans on that pane,l don't want to bring down Hillary Clinton, you're six years old!"

Even FOX, that had driven the fatwa had reported the truth in 2014:

"A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya.

The report alleges no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies surrounding the incident, the report concludes that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria."​

 

Fascinating. Even though Podliska clearly declared the Benghazi committee was formed for no reason other than to investigate the death of four Americans, you cling to McCarthy's awkwardly worded statement as "proof" that it's not true. That's just proof of how desperate those on the left are to save Hillary's sinking candidacy.

As far as the "truth" of what was reported in 2014 by anyone, nobody knew about Hillary's secret private server, and all the e-mails sitting on it with respect to administration activities surrounding Benghazi. How could any investigative agency come to the conclusion that the administration acted properly without all the evidence on the table?? I'll help you -- you can't. Hillary's secret private server changes everything.

 

Looks like that phony scandal is taking it's toll on Hillary's poll numbers, eh?

​

 

You inane desperate attempts to excuse and divert do not mitigate what jppened in Benghazi, Hillary and her staff's role in it and the subsequent finding she was running a shawdow state department and endangering our national security

 

It is pure desperation on their part. LOTS of us warned that scandal and misdealings and malfeasance have always surrounded the Clinton's and any investigation would turn into scandal. That is exactly what McCarthy was pointing out.

And now we know she was discussing CIA operatives, in the field, with a private citizen who had no clearence. What will her defenders say now?

 

Nothing of substance. There will be further empty attempts to excuse, divert, and generally tap dance around any fact based discussions.

BTW, I was reminded of an older Hillary scandal that gets little attention while watching the news this morning. Patricia Smith, the mother of Sean Smith who was one of four American diplomats killed in the Benghazi attack, was interviewed on Fox. She recounted how Hillary personally promised to keep her informed of what happened as her son's casket was taken off the plane.

To nobody's surprise, that promise has been broken. There has been absolutely no contact by Hillary or anyone from the State Department. This poor mother has heard nothing beyond Hillary blaming the video in their one brief interaction.

How anyone can attempt to defend, much less support, this excuse for a morally and ethically corrupt human being is beyond me. It's unbelievable.

 

The $4.5 million GOP vendetta continues to collapse:

 

K

You guys should check her underwear drawer too. You are right around the corner from getting rid of her for good. LOL....These buffoons have been frantically trying to kill these Clintons for 24 years now and they always end up looking like Wiley Coyote getting duped every time. My prediction is this: The GOP will nominate another loser neoCON war hawk and get beat by Hillary Clinton. They will whine like castrated little pigs, blaming the liberal media and not learning a damn thing. About a year into her first term, they will cook up some new BS scandals and start rejoicing that they will impeach her or that she will lose in 2020. Then they will lose big time again. Of course, like all imbeciles they will not take any responsibility for their losses, but blame it all on the media.lol

 

It's a whole lot more bang for the buck than the $500 million Obama spent to train a hand full of Syrian fighters that are either dead, captured or have fled….

Regardless, Hanna doesn't appear to have any first hand dealing with the Benghazi Committee. I don't know what his agenda is, but I'm sure there is more to come.

BTW, meeting with Trey Gowdy will not be anything like the creme puff Democratic "debate" that was nothing more than a coronation for Hillary amongst some pretty pathetic light weights. Hillary is going to have to answer real questions under oath. There won't be any room for tap dancing, or issuing hollow Democratic talking points. Gowdy won't allow for her usual BS. He has one shot at her and he knows he has to make the best of it. The hearing should make for quite a show.

 

The Hillary haters will try to keep the vendetta on life support, of course, but with one Republican after another now admitting the obvious, it's collapsing.

[video=youtube;ojreQLt18iY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojreQLt18iY[/video]​

Rather than contriving and conducting endless smear campaigns, they'd be far better finding and supporting a viable opponent.

 

We've been through this several times. The FBI doesn't investigate "smear campaigns". You can repeat tired Democratic talking points until you're blue in to face, but it doesn't change reality. The work of the Benghazi committee exposed the existence of Hillary's secret private server. Fact. That opened up the flood gates to understanding that Hillary deliberately exposed classified material on an insecure network. Fact. That her deliberate and careless activities potentially put national security at risk. Fact.

The committee was formed for one reason only -- Obama and his Administration lied to the public about Benghazi. To this day, we've voluntarily got little from them other than Hillary's explanation of "At this point what does it matter??" Well, the lives lost matter. If Hillary is being targeted now, it's because her activities say she deserves to be. I hope this finally buries her and ends the Clinton wet dreams of running the country again forever. If competence, honesty and integrity were important to you, then you'd feel that way also.

 

It sounds as if more and more Republicans have decided it's time to give up trying to milk it.

The vendetta has become embarrassingly obvious.

"This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton," said Hanna, who is not a member of the committee. "After what Kevin McCarthy said, it's difficult to accept at least a part of it was not. I think that's the way Washington works. But you'd like to expect more from a committee that's spent millions of dollars and tons of time." Representative Richard Hanna (R)​

​

“Everybody thought that Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.” Representative Kevin McCarthy (R)​

A former staffer with the House Select Committee on Benghazi, conservative Republican Major Richard Poliska, says the panel's probe has become a politically motivated inquiry targeting Hillary Clinton.​

“You don’t think the Benghazi thing is political? Of course, it’s political….If you think those guys, those Republicans on that panel don’t want to bring down Hillary Clinton, you’re six years old. Of course, they do.” Conservative Entertainer Bill O'Reilly​

 

Natty, I guess you answered this in your last post…..

 

Go ahead, you can just begin calling her Madam President now.

 

I would say that is mostly untrue. We know that the Administration, Obama, Clinton and many others made fatal mistakes that cost 4 Americans their lives. This investigation is more comprehensive than the other limited investigations put together to assuage the administration of guilt. Anyone who is honest about this, or even anyone who doubts this is true, need only to watch this short video to be convinced of this:

[video=youtube;DFFleTc_fKo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFFleTc_fKo[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

Bill O'Reilly is not a republican. He's a libertarian independent.

 

Hillary is toast. If she get's the nomination, she will loose in the biggest landslide in history, even against (or especially against) Donald Trump.

[video=youtube;5MBjAN7jqsQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MBjAN7jqsQ[/video]​

 

Video: Hillary Can't Answer Specific Email Questions, Resorts to False Talking Points.....

She's "taken responsibility," she says -- albeit kicking and screaming, according to the New York Times. How authentic is that contrition? Her very next assertion is that her unsecure private server arrangement was "allowed." No, it wasn't. Further, at no point has she "tried to be as transparent as possible." She kept the existence of her server a secret, resisted turning over emails until caving under pressure and court orders, only handed over the server itself when the FBI came knocking, and withheld relevant emails despite swearing under penalty of perjury that she hadn't. This is the antithesis of transparency. Indeed, even many in the media and some Democrats concede that Occam's Razor suggests that the entire purpose of her server's existence was to thwart transparency. As for the "marked classified" parsing, I broke down the self-serving evolution on Hillary's excuses on this front, each made necessary by the collapse of the last.

From "no classified material" (false), to "no material that was classified at the time" (false), to "I didn't send or receive the material personally" (false) to "it wasn't *marked* classified at the time." As I explain in the clip, this final distinction is meaningless. Under the law, it was her duty to recognize and protect classified information -- and even untrained laypeople could instantly intuit that top secret details about North Korean nukes, or secret updates on Iranian negotiations, or the identity of a CIA asset in Libya very obviously constituted classified secrets, both at the time and ever since. She is incapable of telling the truth on this issue because the truth could place her in further legal jeopardy. Hillary Clinton, her "competitor" Bernie Sanders, and much of the Democratic base believes this is a non-issue that should go away. Two Obama administration Inspectors General, the FBI, and most voters disagree. Mrs. Clinton appears to have broken multiple rules -- and possibly laws -- while recklessly compromising national security, to protect her political ambitions. And she's lied about it. Repeatedly. I'll leave you with this:.....snip~

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...ions-resorts-to-false-talking-points-n2065974


Its not looking good for Old Granny Clinton, huh?

 

That's okay, the RNC is in the tank for Bush. Hillary won't get the nod because Obama will indict her and "clear a path" for Biden.

​

 

The "60 Minutes" video you imbedded is powerful, and a must watch for anyone who cares about the truth. On that note, it's even a better watch for partisan liberals who would rather talk about "vendettas" than accept the reality of the cover-up engineered by Obama and Hillary. It's disgusting that public officials would rather cover their azzes than own up to the truth and discuss lessons learned moving forward.

 

Well if you need any more evidence that Bernie Sanders and the other underperformers are nothing but a bunch of schills, you need to look no further than the democrats first fake debate.

[video=youtube;W9yGFfNYBQE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9yGFfNYBQE[/video]​

 

Hillary Clinton should be the focus of the committee says the mother of one victim of the Benghazi terrorist attacks.

 

How would he know he is not on the committee nor part of the process nor has access to the evidence or deliberations. So congress crittersbjust like publicity, especially little known ones.

 

And the Democrats will not hold their officials responsible for malfeasence in office, selling influence and criminal acts. Yeah we get it.