The more they whine and riot, the more I know I voted right

Let me try to explain this to you.

They are confined inside state borders.

 

Democrats, at the end of the Bill Clinton era, mastered the art of having illegals vote. Why do you think it is here in CA that Hillary managed to overcome Trumps lead in the rest of the states?

I did a lot of checking here in my state to find out how easy it is for illegals to vote. They are still citizens of Mexico. But so long as they sign they are citizens, they vote. Nobody checks to see if they really are citizens.

 

Putin joined Obama in bombing Syria. Add that to Obama bombing Iraq and you have a formula.

 

I'm not clear in other states how easy it is for illegals to vote, but I SWEAR on a stack of Bibles it is super easy here in CA.

We do not verify citizenship. We do not even ask for ID when a person votes. CA operates off they trust illegals to be honest.

Imagine that, just the illegals word is all they seek.

I want to add this

My Real Estate license .... they forced me to prove where I was born. I had to turn in a certified birth certificate.

Same when I was licensed as a certified appraiser.

Want to know more? For both licenses, they forced me to get a FBI background check.

Voters in CA do none of that.

 

You might want to try calming down and editing that post so it makes some sort of sense to readers.

 

Thanking your lucky stars, eh leprechaun?

 

Every court that had look into the matter at both the federal and state levels had come to the conclusion that there is no repeat no meaningful illegal voting in Federal elections.

But that right wing fantasy keep going on supported by those who wish to suppress the voting of non whites citizens.

 

No, a court would need to call in the illegals and try to get them to tell the truth.

Do you think they will admit they committed perjury?

Then you had Obama telling them this.

[video=youtube;7R_aT6ucGNQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R_aT6ucGNQ[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

Let me give you the short Obama version of illegals voting

[video=youtube;nVR1ZrR0Iu4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVR1ZrR0Iu4[/video]

 

Are there really? Do the math, that's only 125,000,000 yet there are actually around 225,000,000 eligible voters. If at the end of the day you had 100% turn out and ended with the loser getting more popular vote, you might have a point. So long as you have many more millions than the difference who didn't cast a vote, such numbers are actually meaningless...

 

And why would I do that?

- - - Updated - - -

You can read minds?!? That's an amazing super power. Now how about actually trying to answer the question?

 

criminal rioters are being arrested... protestors have a constitutional right to protest, nothing can be done about them, and I am also one that doesn't agree with their reasons for protesting, I would of been happier with them had they just actually spent the time to vote on election day instead

 

I think Obama was been a decent president but one thing i hate about what he's done is how he has embraced racist, lying and violent groups like BLM. Obama should've come out and condemned BLM and told the American public that cops are good and that even though there are some bad apples in law enforcement, it's the minority. Obama should've condemned the lies perpetuated by BLM and liberal media and condemned the riots instigated by allegations of racism without even knowing the facts on many of these shootings.

 

They have a right to protest, but not in the street where they are blocking traffic. BTW why are they not required to buy and get a parade permit?????????????

 

Because those are all Dem Party controlled areas and if you are protesting the Right in a Dem area then you do not have to follow any laws.

 

yes and if they were protesting legally in a republican areas they would be harassed by the cops, we known, we saw what happened to the OWS protestors

.

 

Seriously?

 

"We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!" - Trump

Retweets 13,780
Likes 6,179
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/266034630820507648?lang=en

Do you assume that if Trump lost and the Trump march on Washington had happened that not a single protester would turn violent? Do you assume that if Trump had lost that there would have been no protests in America?

 

The Green Tea Party which is Republican conservatives did have protests when Obama won and they did it without violence.

 

You mean the OWS protesters who were illegally occupying spaces, who were crapping on cop cars, raping one another, doing heavy duty drug dealing, stealing, trying to blow up bridges, and whom did burn buildings? Yeah, that . . . was . . . awesome.

 

I mean the cops that were tear gassing people doing nothing wrong, but I think you knew that....

or the ones telling them they could protest as long as they did not sit down and kept moving or they would be arrested for vagrancy

.

 

Very true. There were protest votes and there were voters that did not even bother to show up to vote so I guess these were the boycott voters...and then there were the spiteful voters, the ones that really do not give a bat crap about policy or their country, but rather enjoy being contrary, confrontational, oppositional and spiteful in order to give their small lives meaning.

 

LOL once more it is too bad that the civil right protectors could not had been stop in the 1960s as they did not have parade permits but kept marching even after the local police turn dogs and fire hoses even on the children marchers.

Oh for the 1950s when American was truly great for white racists.

 

The simple fact is people are getting damned sick and tired of "protesters" rioting in the streets and damaging property. A further fact is they accomplish nothing but making people mad at them.

 

Love how the alt right wing movement try to do a one to one match between protesters and rioters.

They seems to have no shame in that regard at all.

Oh for the 1950s when American was great for white males and everyone else knew their place. May Trump return us to that happy time.

 

Had Trump lost, there may have been SOME protests, but the actual likelihood of this kind of violence and criminal activity (such as looting, assaulting innocent citizens, and the wanton destruction of private property) would be practically non-existent.

It has been proven that the few instances of violence that occurred at Trump rallies were instigated by agitators who were sent there to do exactly that - instigate violence to create a public impression that only liberal lap dogs fully buy into.

Trump is a blow-hard. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

"Pro-Trump" voters, in truth, should be more accurately referred to as "anti-Clinton" more than anything else.

That's a fact that you might want to consider.