GAY TEACHER READS HOMOSEXUAL STORY TO 3RD GRADERS

Currently as it is kids learn about life and society from both schools and their families. It helps them learn more faster. And in many ways being good at life is a lot more important than knowing when Plato lived. Kids will figure a lot of thing out without school but school helps them figure it out sooner and more accurately. The problem is that schools don't teach kids enough about life and the skills it really takes to succeed so kids have to figure it all out by themselves, and a lot don't, which doesn't seem to me to be what school is supposed to be about. I just don't see why to you schools should teach culture but not society given how related they really are.

 

And all of those homosexual characters are vastly outnumbered by heterosexual characters. So it looks like advertising is on your side.

 

Then why does there exist an organ that serves no procreation purpose but only exists for pleasure?

 

Who gives a **** if it's acceptable to you? No one is forcing you into a gay marriage. Why are you intent on forcing your theocratic beliefs on others?

Civil rights should not be up to a popular vote. If they were, we'd probably still have "colored" facilities in the South.

 

So you will encourage deviant, abnormal sexual behavior for your children. Just own it.

Or is the problem that you don't understand what the words "deviant" or "abnormal" mean?

 

Really? How are killing each other or pooping in fields normal human behavior?

Feel free to cite statistics.

 

Dude, restroom isn't a euphemism. It's the proper name. Bathrooms are in houses, and are named so because of the bath being there. There are no baths in restrooms. Yes a lot of people use the words interchangeably, but neither is a euphemism.

 

We know exactly what they mean, we are just not accepting your negative spin on those meanings.

 

What negative spin? The behavior he will encourage in his children is abnormal deviant sexual behavior. That is objectively true.

 

Teach the "dry" stuff (facts and figures) and leave the rest to family. Making a success of life has nothing to do with learning social studies. No one needs that stuff to do well. It's fluff and opinions.

 

Anthropologically speaking.

 

How so exactly? Demonstrate how that is normal human behavior in the world today?

Or you can admit it was a bullshit comparison and just withdraw it.

 

Do you know any anthropology? It seems unlikely, given your reaction.

 

We are talking about normal HUMAN behavior. Why do I give a **** what other apes do?

Demonstrate that killing each other and pooping in fields is normal modern human behavior or withdraw your bullshit claim.

 

You go to a toilet for a rest? Do they have comfy couches and armchairs in American toilets?

 

Yeah, like homeschooling and brainwashing kids about 'gods' and 'sin' isn't 'fluff and opinion'?

 

Ask the guys fighting your wars. Not many toilets in the Iraqi desert.

 

They make up less than 1% of the population. How do their actions represent normal human behavior?

 

Simply prove that it is not normal for a Human population to have that 1% of its numbers be homosexual.
Having blue eyes is not an overwhelming human trait. Only a small percentage of humans have blue eyes yet it is not abnormal for humans to have blue eyes.

It is not abnormal for human populations to have homosexual members.

 

In their situation it is quite normal. Until the flushing toilet was invented a spade and a hole in the ground were quite normal.
Homosexuality and lesbianism are as normal for gay men and lesbians, as heterosexual behaviour is to heterosexuals.

 

No. Objectively speaking it is exactly abnormal for humans to have blue eyes.

Do none of you understand what "normal" means?

 

And now the goalposts move. We are talking about for the human population as a whole.

Stop falling for the Christofascist trap that "normal" and "abnormal" are the same thing as "good" and "bad".

Normal and abnormal are statements of statistical variance. Nothing more.

 

Again, I'd like you to tell me why you think you have a right to vote on what your fellow citizens may do if it has no effect on you. Then I'd like you to tell me why government should even be involved in marriage which is a cultural and social tradition that should belong to the people.

 

Yes I do. It is normal for human populations to have a homosexual component. Prove me wrong.

And it IS normal for humans to have blue eyes - just not all of them.

 

I know that, but 'abnormal' when used as a pejorative, along with 'deviant', are commonplace among the ignorant bigot fraternity.