Missiles Launched From Iran Hit ISIS Terrorist Bases in Syria

Lol ... so of the US Senate votes to attack another country based on lies, fakes and with intention given wrong reasons and claims, it is valid and so hell about the rest on the world, because we are the USA and the rest has to accept our will?

Forget this, these times are in meantime over and you can thank Bush for that with hi attack in 2003!

 

We took 37 nations with us to Iraq. Your notion that we acted alone and said screw everyone else is based in ignorance.

 

and how many of them would do this again, after the bunch of lies to reason this attack were found out, eh?

 

Comments are confusing when you don't read the quote they are replying to.

 

Typical. If you can't win the argument, just declare victory!

 

You keep calling them lies but the ENTIRE planet thought that British intel was valid, not just us. For one, mistakes happen, Second, we did find chemical weapons, and we knew for a fact he had used them in the past against the Kurds and against Iran. We just didn't find a nuclear program, because he likely shipped it all off to Best Korea, when he was playing games with the weapons inspectors.

 

O ... the Brits are now the bad boys? Ehm ... who made again these satellite images of showing a bunch of non existing Scud Missiles and estimated WMD's stores and presented them in front of the world during UN security council meeting? Colin Powell... and he was part of British government now?

And ... not to forget: Who was in front of 9/11 again more interested into Iraq as in Al Qaida and rated them as lesser threat as the Mexican drug cartels, because Clinton BS? And who still wanted to blame on same day of 9/11 Iraq for the terror act and failed due to strict "not with us" reaction of FBI, CIA and NSA? And who marked this attack as war against terror what is laughable BS phrase?

 

Without ignorance these guys wouldn 't have an argument.

Amazing the number of Saddam supporters there are, despite the genocide, rape rooms, mass graves, destruction of the environment, murdering political opponents, attacking his neighbors, and so on. They still remain convinced that George Bush and the leaders of those 37 other nations are the real villains and Saddam Hussein was the victim.

 

This is news, but I don't see Iran invading or bombing a dozen other countries. You know, like we do with impunity. But if it makes Republicans tremble in their sleep, I'm all for it.

 

Nobody loves a dictator, like the American Democrat party. Name a dictator, and I'll name you a Democrat politician who thought they were "getting a bad wrap" or "aren't as bad as some people think". Dennis Rodman is someone we laugh at, but we have an entire party as naive as him.

 

We do bomb countries that train and harbor terrorists

And that makes terrorists and their friends very angry

 

You mean the chemical weapons that you supplied? BTW, their shelf life expired in the 1990s.

Have to laugh at your claim that Saddam shipped his nuclear program to a country 5000 miles away, and what would be the point!

Everyone knows it's really easy to transport a nuclear program when you were the most intensely spied on country in the world!

 

That was also true during the entire Cold War, from "Uncle Joe" Stalin to Fidel Castro. They seem to love authoritarian figures, which helps explain their support of Saddam Hussein.

 

|Selling chemicals is not illegal. It goes on all the time. Your complaint should be against the person who actually used them as weapons, though that's unlikely.

Yeah, Saddam Hussein got a raw deal.

 

They still fawn over Fidel Castro. Obama praised him the day of his death. How you can praise a blood thirsty dictator is beyond me. Democrats don't believe in the things they say they do. They have no desire to win people over to their ideas. If they voiced their true ideas, they would get even less votes than they have recently.

 

I won the argument with the opinion of Kofi Annan.
Get over it already.

 

If you say so. But, the reality is, you just don't have an opinion you can articulate, so you just declare yourself the winner. Only a fool would fall for that but, luckily that's the only kind of person that needs to, in order for you think highly of yourself.

 

Somebody has to, if another power ranked #1 the lsit would be diffrent.

 

Were we partly destroyed before ? 'cause I'm looking at the map and it doesnt look good to your side....sorry if I offended your threat.

 

lol so what would you do to this tribe ?

 

We know, Saddam was just a misunderstood poet, the blame is on the US because they didnt employ his pack of wolves after the war and didnt find a target for them to keep them occupied killing other Muslims, but nothing to the fact that Saddam raised these bastards to begin with, and God knows what Saddam and his savages would do today if left alone as you would have them.

 

Do to them? They were no longer a tribe. Let them be where they were at. Or have them be refugees as the Syrians and Iraqis are today.

Shall we give the Syrian and Iraqi refugees their very own country?

 

Which side are you referring to and what map are you looking at? On the one hand, I see Israelis fretting every day with every movement associated with Iran and running around the world telling everyone who cares to listen about how Iran is expanding and setting up bases around it. On the other hand, I read your comments and get the sense that you are looking at some other map that shows Israel expanding and setting up bases against Iran. Which one is it then?

In the meantime, let me say that while I personally would prefer to see, in the long run, a situation where there is a Jewish state (albeit one whose basis and justification would need to be more sensible than the ones peddled by political Zionist ideology) within a confederate arrangement in Palestine, and would like to see that Jewish state have good relations with Iran, a part of me thinks that the combination of certain transient factors coupled with unbelievable arrogance have caused such megalomania among some Israelis that the chances that there will be a lasting Jewish state in the region is fast evaporating. This is all the more true every since Israel was stupid enough to abandon its old policy of seeking the so-called Alliance of the Periphery and has instead decided to befriend the likes of Wahhabi Arabia and even ISIS and Al Queda. Honestly, with these kind of friends, who needs enemies? In fact, Israel's geopolitical stupidity and shortsightedness is amazingly baffling. The Israelis are working with the Sunni Arabs to create a Sunni NATO against Iran. It seems it has never occurred to them that such a force can easily become a monster that would bite them far more seriously than it could ever touch Iran! Lets say this Sunni NATO is formed and everyone of these sunni states is on board with the ideas being peddled by Wahhabi Arabia. That likes of Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan (with its nukes) come together with the sheikdoms of Arabia and are fed hundreds of billions of dollars in arms and equipment to counter Iran. I am sure all of them combined won't be able to accomplish much against Iran, which has stood to all of them before. But Israel? They will need only to sneeze and you will be gone.

 

"I see Israelis fretting every day..."

"a part of me thinks that the combination of certain transient factors coupled with unbelievable arrogance have caused such megalomania among some Israelis that the chances that there will be a lasting Jewish state in the region is fast evaporating|".

"...Israel was stupid enough to abandon its old policy of seeking the so-called Alliance of the Periphery and has instead decided to befriend the likes of Wahhabi Arabia and even ISIS and Al Queda"

"In fact, Israel's geopolitical stupidity and shortsightedness is amazingly baffling"

http://www.newschoolers.com/forum/thread/236199/Nobel-Prizes--Jews-Vs-Muslims

 

What has your post got to do with the post you replied to? At first I thought that you were implying that his post was copied from a website but then it became obvious that you are just trying to make a point. Can you not attempt to refute any of the points made or do you claim some sort of smugness as if you were the one who got those awards. Is your name on that list otherwise what is the point of it?