7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world around them

You can't even make any moral equivalency. Not trying to elect a crooked and corrupt incompetent. Nor pimping that Demo flag, over a party that is corrupt as a whole. Who has to cheat in order to win elections, and who has to divide a country just to have a chance at winning.

No morals, no character, nothing worth anything, and nothing that represents what is Right. That's the Democrat life. Your Idols. A waste of ****in space.

 

Really, that's the argument you want to go with? "those of us legally carrying firearms commit less crime than those who aren't legally carrying a firearm." I think I did a spit take when I read this. Congratulation, you know the definition of a criminal but it really does nothing to answer the question of gun free zones.
Your post was a logic free zone.

 

No, what's weird is that your answer has nothing at all to do with the conversation.

 

Maybe you should use a different font.

Time will tell with the ACA but the point has been and still is that I don't see any solution coming from you're side. You're mistaken on Planned Parenthood. My argument is that they ARE an effective establishment, but we already know you have a reading comprehension problem.

Again with the comprehension.....look up inconclusive but to take a different tact......what results are you looking for from Headstart?

The glaring stupidity here is your complete inability to grasp the meaning of the statement........oh, we're back to that darn comprehension problem again.

 

So you were being deliberately misleading about programs being effective or ineffective then? I've stated multiple times that if something is inconclusive after 52 years, then it's time to call the program a failure and move onto something else that isn't a failure. If Planned Parenthood -is- successful, then you're attempting to shift the argument into an area that you believe you can easily defend. Additionally, I didn't say we should close down Planned Parenthood, I asked if you had data to show it wasn't effective. Are you sure you want to be accusing me so often of a reading comprehension problem?

I'm not looking for any results. If the program has not shown to have been clearly successful, then it's time to close up shop and push them money into a different, established program that works, or, retool HeadStart using the data collected to trim the areas of the program off that are believed to be problem areas and reinforce parts of the program that are believed to be working. This isn't difficult, I don't know why you're having such a hard time with it.

Apologies, but you're unable to have a conversation rooted in even basic logic. You do what the progressive left does so well. You attempt to argue based on feeling, clinging to a `factoid` that you can pretend makes you rational, and simply cry and holler at your opposition.

You have refuted none of my arguments, and just scream over and over `` nonono poopyhead ur rong``. Perhaps if you had headstart in your life you'd be able to have a discussion and refute/rebut facts...

 

That sums it up perfectly. That's their idea of "analysis"! LOL

 

It wasn't a validation of Krauthammer's assertion. The OP was long on stereotypes and short on fact or evidence.

But taking it at face value, and acting as though it was self evident (without facts or evidence) does validate what many liberals believe about many conservatives.

We see conservatives on this forum all the time demonstrate fundamental ignorance of government, history, geography and world affairs. We see the xenophobia and anti intellectualism. And we see the virulant racism of some of the conservatives here.

Appeals to all of these negative instincts have been in the playbook of conservative politicians for years.

 

Of course.

Of the two of us, I'm not the one who thinks signs stop criminals, if that's your point.

Hard to tell with that response.

You should start a business making personal protection bubbles for people. Maybe tshirts or hats or something.

 

I posted this exact same thing and the mods closed my thread.

 

Sure, I'll do that when you go to Chicago and make sure everyone has a legal firearm.

 

Do you disagree with all of it?

The fact is Trump won the election fairly and is our president for the next 3+ years and the left and anti Trumpets refuse to accept him as president. We have never had it this bad before. Everyone should respect the presidential election as long as the candidate is not evil and Trump is not Evil. The media and the left wants to force everyone to live in their bubble and that is never going to happen. People like you seem so Anti Trump as if Hillary would have been a better president and that is not even funny. Defend liberals while they continue to screw up America? Oh wait you must be a liberal then.

Liberals think they can do no wrong when many of our problems in this country are from them. I am so glad that train has been derailed for a long time.

 

The moderators are funny like that but this is still in my opinion the best political forum online so I would not worry about the little things. Just enjoy the conversation. I received a warning for calling a liberal liar a liar when he was clearly lying and I just let it go. It's not worth the headache.

 

Now you are the one stereotyping. I don't disagree that the OP did not post a lot to support the claims in the article and I don't agree with generalizing an entire side let alone a group. I find it funny how you say the OP is stereotyping when you just did the exact same thing.

 

Best thing for you to do is make use of Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_cover_by_state_in_the_United_States

 

That is different. When Democrats do it, they call it fact. When we do the same thing, they call it lying.

 

I am a drug addict - love me some coffee. I think all drugs should be decriminalized. Addicts should get treatment, not punishment. Violent criminals, of course, should be prosecuted.

 

No thanks, I avoid Democrat controlled areas if possible.

If a criminal wants me to have to defend myself, they'll have to initiate the violence.

Thanks for continuing the emotional tirade though, I'm amused by the fact that you keep reinforcing my original point.

 

Oh you did? I apologise for missing it..


.

 

Well, I went back and checked, and it wasn't exactly the same, but similar. Apparently mine was too offensive to liberals.

 

Thanks. It doesn't matter if you missed it anyways because it was locked, and no one can reply to it anymore.

 

Oh lord. Another brainwashed lost cause.

 

How can you even deny #2? Righy talk radio didn't even start till after the fairness doctrine ended in 1987., Rush for example didn't become national till 1988, Fox news started in 1996



Liberals sources of information are ever presen



.

 

''7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world around them''






Another hate flame thread that targets liberals.

As usual, right wing trolls with their endless hate and attacks ...

 

I would give you a link to mine, but I don't know if I'm "allowed" to do that.

 

You have a link Chris just want to read it real fast and see what the lefts points were.



.