This is just getting worse. Drag Queen constests for CHILDREN?

I feel sorry for anyone with young children nowadays. They are doomed to be growing up in this warped mentality.

 

Yep, proof if proof were needed that the inmates have taken over the asylum. It's the same kind of brainwashing used to steer kids towards chewing-gum-for-the-brain sport - dumbing them down, in other words - by making them take to the footie field holding hands with players. 'Get 'em young and you've got 'em for life.'

THE END IS NIGH!

 

`
`
Infowars
`

 

The really warped notion is that there is anything that is exclusively male or female. Pink was a color commonly associated with males. Men's fashion was the one that started high heals. Gowns, dresses and skirts have been worn by men throughout history. Hell even now kilts are on an upswing, and they really are nothing more than a skirt by another name. There is only one thing that is uniquely female and that is giving birth. To date no physical male has ever mutated enough to be able to carry, develop and birth a child. All else is social fiction as to whether it is only for male or female.

 

I blame people like this . . .



Men in frocks? And funny hats??

 

A Kilt is not a Skirt, thou clod of dirt in my coffee.

 

So ?
They wear them in your Country too.

 

In every country on the planet.

 

Looked like at the outside there were maybe 30 people there, tops!

In fact it was so poorly attended and badly organized that I suspect that it was ONLY the FAMILIES of those drag queens who attended.

Compare that to the thousands of perverts at the sexualized Toddlers in Tiaras industry where there are estimated to be 250,000 "pageants" annually with $20 billion dollars. And yes, they sexualize both girls AND SMALL BOYS upnow!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_beauty_pageant

 

I will just make you notice that when some men started to wear high heals, wigs and make up in my country, they ended with a revolution and a lot of beheadings. So, I'm not sure it's a good examples.

About the fact that men wear and wore dresses, I would agree but I would add a nuance : dresses wore like men are rarely the dresses wore by women. A grand boubou for men and women aren't the same thing, a kimono for men is not a kimono for women.

About drag queens, I don't think it's a good thing, but it concern themselves only, however, I'm extremly doubtful about the involvment of children in a sexual practice.

 

OP

It's just another example of the degeneration of western culture. Maybe we could learn something from moderate Islam? With the seemingly unending assaults of children by church-oriented paedophiles, there's obviously nothing we can learn from our own religions?

 

No, Islam even moderate is the antithesis of western culture.

 

Well if western culture means ever-increasing child abuse, I'll go with moderate Islam. (our first disagreement? lol)

 

Iraq tried to pass a law to be able to marry 9 YO, there were a parliamant member in Indonesia who tried the same. Why ? Muhammed married Aisha when she was 6 and consummed their marriage when she was 9. Some muslims would pretend that a 1 before the six and the nine magically disappeared. So I doubt that Islam is that clean considering child abuse. The fact I had a former gf from a muslim background who was abused young can influence my point of view.

Furthermore, what I like the most about western culture is


Or :


And all of that are antithesis of what islamic culture is.

 

I couldn't agree more; I adore sculpture, especially that of the human form, and have many fine examples in my home. I wish they included the one in your pic. But just because one Muslim got involved with a child doesn't mean that it's a characteristic of the religion per se, nor inherent in the regional culture?

 

Muhammed isn't just one muslim, he is the perfect example for muslims and he had strange relationships with little girls.

For sure, western culture is degenerating, but I doubt that Islam is in any way a solution.

The only solution is strictness. Every great civilization were build on strict discipline. Harsh punishment and no tolerance for crimes.

 

I doubt it too, and only meant it in the sense that 'serious situations call for serious measures to address them', and I have such strong feelings about paedophilia. To me paedophilia is the ultimate crime against humanity, with the possible exception of genital mutilation practiced in the name of religion - indeed, in the name of anything!!

Absolutely right, but that will never happen in liberal societies, and that's what causes the degeneration in the first place. Most human beings will always seek excess, and whatever it takes, they need to be controlled.

 

lefties leftying.

 

You're right. Murder, rape, crippling someone, all of that are the trio of the worst horrors possible, especially on children.

Yes. I think we live a century of confusions. Order emerge always from chaos. When the roman civilization fell down, it took centuries for western civilization to rise again, and considerably changed. Roman felt closer from a north african than a scandinavian, now, it's the opposite.

Unfortunately, It's like sickness, I just think we have to endure and wait it pass off and try to preserve our culture and pass it on. If this century is just about desires and caprices, we just have to better ourselve. I feel like Sidonius Apollinaris. He saw the end of the roman/latin empire and culture and the emergence of the middle age culture.

Even if on some aspects, I totally belong to this century, like the fact I don't care of people being gay, on other aspects, mostly artistic, I don't feel I belong to this century, but to an european civilization who is now dead, the one who existed between the 10th century until world war 2.

 

I also feel excluded: even among my few friends (I'm not into acquaintances), because none of them share my appreciation of my favourite art forms: I don't know anyone who appreciates ballet as much as I do, which in my opinion is the purest art form of them all, with its combination of exquisite music and movement. In fact my best friend is a footie fanatic , whereas I can't bear team sports of any kind. I love tennis though, primarily because I used to play it at club level, but I only like the 'gladiatorial' ethos of the singles - when the doubles come on in the evenings at Wimbledon is when I turn the telly off.

 

Really? Then pray tell, good sir, how the kilt doth differ from a skirt.

 

Aside from a poor correlation/causation fallacy here, this is only one period. The flux on which fashion s belonged to which sex/gender has gone on since the beginning of time.

There are always variations. I can as easily argue that the dresses worn by women in the 50's are rarely the dresses worn by women in the 2010's. It takes.nothing away from the fact that what is "men's clothing" and what is "women's clothing" are pure fictional social constructs and are subject to social change, even as far a 180 degrees.

I am kinda lost with this. What sexual practice are you referring to?

 

Prove it. And yes, for me there is a cause/correlation, french nobility were knigths, then they were made useless by fireweapon. At this moment the nobility ceased to have the usefullness they were supposed to have : be fighters, they became mostly useless, lazy and idle. That's at this moment they started to wear make up, wigs and high heals, then at a moment, the commoners were fed up of feeding those useless leaches when they, the little people, were starving and dirty poor, so they revolted.

Until the 1900, 90 % of work were physical, men and women are very different in a physical way and extremly unequal to on this plan so the societies were organized on the physical abilities of each. The costumes reflected this physical reality.
I have a big book about costumes through history and space. It's funny to see some similarities between for instance mezoamerican costumes and Egyptian or some Indian.
So no, it's not purely "fictionnal", it represented societies where most work were physical and and those societies were so organized in a sexist way, because women and men are far to be equal on a physical way. Those costume differences represented the differences of role in those societies.

All the transgender stuff is about sexuality. But in a society where there is beauty pageant for children and that some models are like 14 YO and 15 YO, I'm not very surprized.

 

I suggest that you know which 'genre' of paedophilia I'm talking about the same as everybody else here does? I obviously wouldn't kill someone for looking at photos of children; on the other hand I'd keep a very close eye on them.