Slobber away. You are angry over an event when she was still in her mid 20s and he is accused. Bear in mind, she is the sole source of her story. And she is under a court order. When she gets a court order, she has to obey law. I have yet to hear of those evangelicals supporting Trump. Who are they? Count me out since i am not one. I hold Trump accountable since Jan 20, 2017. And at the moment, courts are protecting this event from the public. By the way, you swerve away from Democrats. Do you realize this?
That's what's called B E I N G B R A I N W A S H E D He could should someone on 5th avenue and not lose support.
And she is forcing Twittler to respond to enforcing the court order, if he so wishes. If he does, then he admits he is the dude in the action, which opens him up to ridicule and the source of an illegal campaign contribution.
How do you figure? There are overwhelmingly more registered Democratic voters than republican and Trump lost the literal vote count by 3 million.
She has no case. The contract was completed between the LLC "EC" and her. Money was exchanged, done deal. Trump doesn't have to admit or deny anything because his blind faith supporters are with him 100% no matter what. They could find dead hookers in his trunk with his DNA and the Republicans would find some way to say George Soros funded a setup and Alex Jones would sell a lot of dick pills and the brain dead conservatives would go on living in their merry little alt reality.
None of which means a thing. If goes forward, he admits he is the guys. If he does not go forward, Stormy releases the material that he is the guy. This affects the non-Trump voters, a huge majority.
To date Trump hasn't gotten drunk and had any floaters pop up from the Chappaquiddick, there's that as well.
Here is the progressive left's reaction to Trump cheating on his wives before becoming president; Here is the average American's reaction;
Based on my knowledge of contract law ... let's examine facts. 1. Attorney drew up the contract. If there is proof he did not know what contract law is, I have yet to see it. For that sum of money, he would dot his i's and cross his t's. He would not leave any escape hatches. 2. If she collected money, she fulfilled one of her conditions in the contract. 3. Contract law determines so long as these are the features. a. lawful purpose b. capacity to consent c. Offer d. acceptance e. consideration f. in writing .. contract is valid The payment to her is consideration. One would think she would have managed to not try to profit more. I see her efforts as failed blackmail. She was no doubt thinking she could milk this for a lot more cash. I don't want lectures on contract law since not all contracts must be in writing.
I'm not a democrat so I frankly don't care what they say to defend their own ilk. My principal concern, my single issue, is weakening and delegitimizing religion in this country. I know plenty of evangelicals that voted and support POTUS. My principal aim to resolve the above concern is to continuously point out this hypocrisy; and continuously rail on and on about it to them.
And in an unrelated story, Melania Knauss Trump got an Einstein Visa to enter the country... It's the century of women, fellas.....
Stormy is under contract. Do you believe in contracts? What is your concern she violated the terms of her contract? Trump is not delegitimizing religion. I believe we teach in my non evangelical church the belief in forgiveness and redemption. It must be painful though for Trump getting his gonads kicked by his wife. I feel so bad for their children who are catching hell over this. The media went out of their way to protect Clinton. And to trash Trump.
You couldn't be more mistaken. Trump is destroying the republican party and I am enjoying it immensely.
Since you have once again lost track of the discussion, Trump's lies and cover ups are this year. Not 12 years ago.
Heh heh and meantime it was Obama that got an undeserved nobel peace prize. Europeans screw things up. Did Melania Trump Merit an ‘Einstein Visa’? Probably, Immigration Lawyers Say https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/us/melania-trump-einstein-visa.html
I believe the lawyer is under contract, not Trump. I believe the woman is also under contract not to talk. As far as I can determine, one is not forced to confess to the media. Do you know a law saying otherwise?
Trump has his spokespeople out saying that the relationship never happened. No contract makes lies the truth. You know some alternate reality saying otherwise?
I see, you accuse "his people of lying" What duty to the media do they have over events of 12 years ago? She signed a contract and we know it because the lawyer that signed it said he and she did. She may get sued. Doubt she has money though.