Yep. The dossier, full of disgusting lies and smear concocted by Hillary campaign and the DNC in cooperation with British and Russian intelligence services did indeed manipulate the brains of a particularly gullible segment of the population. You weren't talking about undeniable and undisputed facts about Hillary, her campaign and the DNC, published by Wikileaks by any chance, were you? We are all in favor of factual accurate information and well informed better educated electorate, right?
"Yep. The dossier, full of disgusting lies and smear concocted by Hillary campaign and the DNC in cooperation with British and Russian intelligence services did indeed manipulate the brains of a particularly gullible segment of the population. You weren't talking about undeniable and undisputed facts about Hillary, her campaign and the DNC, published by Wikileaks by any chance, were you? We are all in favor of factual accurate information and well informed better educated electorate, right?" that's funny........good comics have to have good timing and your times about up
“There is no allegation in this indictment that Americans knew that they were corresponding with Russians. There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result.” Today’s charges include no allegations of knowing involvement by anyone on the campaign and no allegations that the alleged hacking affected the election result. This is consistent with what we have been saying all along.” You just can't make this stuff up!
Sounds like an REO Speedwagon song: Heard it from a friend who Heard it from a friend who Heard it from another you been messin' around... Let's deconstruct this diaphanous construct for clarity. On or about August 15, 2016 (we aren't really sure when, but one time only) the conspirators (presumably acting as a group) posing as Guccifer 2.0 (it was a theater group in costume?) wrote (love notes, threats in block letters, sent anonymous phising emails from Nigeria?) to a person who was in regular contact with (Starbucks barista, Staples office supply delivery guy, AA sponsor?) senior members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump. (heads of voter turnout, polling, venue selection, travel?) Yep, it's clear now. Clear as mud!
Yep Linus, you keep clinging to that blanket... even most of your co-cultists have moved on to the reality of the Mueller Investigation..
The reality is that Trump never financed, or employed foreign agents or foreign government officials to conduct "oppo research" like Crooked Hillary. Trump didn't use his State dept. cronies, and FBI flunkies to abuse the NSA / CIA covert FISA surveillance apparatus either. Rosenstein has twice confirmed Trumps campaign never made any conscious effort to recruit, employ or conspire with foreign operatives. That's exclusively a Clinton "thing".
Excellent Post! Sadly DJT instead of condemning Russia he is accusing the Obama administration. Scum talks crap, Fox call it News!
We do not know yet. The government has not charged Stone, may charge him, may not, or charge someone else.
So if I answer an "unavailable" call I'm colluding? That is the argument of topics, we are colluding if we pick up the phone. Maybe I should send the list of all "unavailable" numbers that have called me since 2016 to Congress and demand they identify the callers?
Actually the point of this thread is how good a job Mueller's team has done identifying the Russian unit, and it's members, that attacked us. That is the point of the investigation, so, that we are aware of what happened, and will be better prepared for their incursions in the years to come, and will strike back. This isn't about Trump directly.
Mueller had the intel reports / assessments a year ago. The CIA / NSA was well aware of the GRU cyber-warfare ops officers who were responsible for the intrusion. Mueller could have obtained this indictment a long time ago ... but of course it would have been pointless. It's largely pointless now, save the fact it provides Rosenstein some measure of "cover". So long as Rosenstein maintains the illusion of "ongoing" investigation, he has a slightly plausible excuse for obstruction. Mueller's team only reviewed IC assessments and ascribed statute violations related to reported events. Mueller's sloth is evident.
Peruvians?? Tunisians?? Mongolians?? So cryptic... Of course it's the Russians... did you see page 1 of the indictments?? I love how it includes all their middle names... need to replace the ink cartridge just to print those suckers...
Pretty much and then "hint" that a former Trump campaign person had contact with teh hacker ... ( Stone has gone over his tweet a thousand times but its breaking news to the lemmings)
Just because someone from the "intelligence community" says something, also doesn't make it true. Can we be consistent there? "They wanted Hillary to lose, and therefore Trump to win..." Actual Indictment: "25% chance, so let's focus on Hillary VS Sanders." ROFL, OMFG. So, what has this even been?
This could not be more factually inaccurate. Hillary's basement server was offline and in the hands of the FBI when trump joked that if the Russians (already) had them, to release them. The reason for that was because the media was going ape over the claim that Russia had hacked and released to wikileaks the poedesta emails and Trump saying it could be Russia, or China etc. It's funny how TDS warps reality in its victims. It's amazing what some are so willing to believe, isn't it?
Why did you leave out the elements of Paragraph 43? a. On or about August 15, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, received a request for stolen documents from a candidate for the U.S. Congress. The Conspirators responded using the Guccifer 2.0 persona and sent the candidate stolen documents related to the candidate’s opponent. b. On or about August 22, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, transferred approximately 2.5 gigabytes of data stolen from the DCCC to a then-registered state lobbyist and online source of political news. The stolen data included donor records and personal identifying information for more than 2,000 Democratic donors. c. On or about August 22, 2016, the Conspirators, posing as Guccifer 2.0, sent a reporter stolen documents pertaining to the Black Lives Matter movement. The reporter responded by discussing when to release the documents and offering to write an article about their release. Lot's of unknown persons, but I guess mention of them isn't important when trying to sell conjecture.
