Thanks, as I said in the earlier Post, I no longer reload 5.56 & only have a 100 yard target range. I was just looking for suggestions for one of the more accurate commercial ammunition brands & weights for a S&W M&P 15 with a 16" barrel that has a 1 - 9" twist. I appreciate your taking the time to respond.
You just lost your asteroid. I did not vote for Trump, and I detest the man. I think he's about as "Presidential" as the Tasmanian Devil; so your claims I'm "supporting" him are what is truly ridiculous, as well as your preposterous assertions that anyone - the NRA or anyone else - promotes sales of guns to violent felons.
You can repeat that lie over and over ad nauseum; it still won't make it true. The Electoral College placed its votes in compliance with the outcome of the individual states' elections, AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTITUTION. Hillary Clinton did not win the states she needed to become President. That is why she lost, NOT because the EC arbitrarily "selected" her opponent. Having a temper tantrum over it only undermines whatever credibility you had left.
Spare me your lecture. I'm an independent, and I vote for what candidates I feel best represent my priorities. I vote for the candidate, not their party...and I did NOT vote for Trump. Your inability to comprehend that maybe - just maybe - people who disagree with you might not be Republicans illustrate just how limited and biased your viewpoints are.
And you have to wonder why so many of the American voting public - a majority of all voters - chose not to vote at all. A point hammered upon endlessly by those who just can't comprehend how our system works. The national popular vote is irrelevant to the election. If a politician wants to be President, they need to win enough states to earn the electoral votes necessary to put them over the top. Hillary Clinton failed to do that, mainly through arrogant assumptions that she had states wrapped up she didn't, and as a result she lost. Whining about it does nothing but make those who supported her look even more petulant and childish.
Agreed. Despite my utter contempt for both Clinton and Trump I refused to simply abstain. I attempted to use my vote to demonstrate that the partisan duopoly needs to be dismantled and replaced with a more equitable system. That so many people stayed home, feeling that they were making a "statement" by abstaining, was incredibly frustrating to me. I would talk to people who would say that voting for anyone other than the two main candidates was "wasting their vote" so why bother; I would tell them that if everyone who felt that way actually went ahead and voted for another candidate maybe their votes wouldn't be "wasted", especially while sitting an home doing nothing truly would be a waste. Sadly, too many people took the easy way out.
Complete rhetoric. We have 2A and you can not change that fact. Care to discuss, bitch, moan or piss yourself about it changes nothing Reiver. You can parse stats, cuss gun owners, call us barbaric but tomorrow morning and each morning in your future 2A stands..... Who the **** told you that the US wants to be like Euro trash?
it quite clearly shows that Clinton received millions more votes than trump did. there is no way to debate that point, without looking like an idiot. I have no obligation to address bullshit you make up and attribute to me.
So you're now prepared to be a grown up and criticise the GOA exec for saying arming toddlers is a good thing?
No, it shows a minority of the American people voting for the two main candidates, and a far, far larger portion of the American public abstaining from voting at all. To claim "the people chose Clinton" when it was a clear minority of the people who did so is to be the idiot. I have made nothing up, and your attempts to claim such only further undermine your battered and broken credibility. Oh, and it's my understanding that profanity is against Forum rules. Just an observation.
There you go again. This is simple. The fellow said he supported arming toddlers. You said you supported his organisation. Until you can deny support of his ridiculous comments, you're on a loser.
It's mind blowing how you can type this bullshit with a straight face, lol. It is a demonstrable fact of reality that Clinton received millions more votes than trump, and was the preferred candidate of the American peop.e. you made up an argument, and attributed it to me. that's called a strawman, and a sign that you know you got your ass kicked, so you have to resort to creating strawman arguments to try and defeat it. It's pathetic.
I don't support Sasha Baron Cohen. I don't support anyone trying to use one of his asinine videos as the basis for a political argument. <<MOD EDIT - Rule 3 - Removed Flamebait>> Lee S did this.
Talk about typing bullshit with a straight face! Far more people didn't vote for Clinton than did, which hardly makes her "the preferred candidate of the American people", and from the standpoint of our political system the popular vote means ZERO. What's pathetic is the self-serving, delusional drivel you keep posting; made even more laughable by your internet commando rhetoric.
Crikey, we're back to what I said. Trump is too liberal for you. You can't even reject 'arming toddlers'.
it is an undeniable fact of realty Clinton received millions more votes than trump, and was americans preferred candidate. But you know I don't post such things. You know perfectly well I posted undeniable demonstrable fact. Your just mad you got your ass kicked, so you have to resort to making **** up and arguing against that.