White House shares doctored video to support punishment of journalist Jim Acosta

Then again that's sort of behavior is the stock and trade of the radical leftist party

 

And you really expect the left to understand that?

 

I don't think you understand what her job was and clearly don't understand the time restraints per questioner.. Bottom line is when the President said "Next" Acostatard should have simply given the mic to the aide and sat down. You want to take the side of Acosta well enjoy the party

 

And that means absolutely nothing. He assaulted her, and now he is out of the WH.

 

Well isn't this familiar, when the spin stop and logic surrounds the illogical then it's WC fields quote "‘If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.’" LMFAO

 

Bullshit... as I told the other tool on here... anybody calling that assault is demeaning the phrase and making it not serious... Are you sure you want to go there??

 

I said Acosta is not blameless here... It's basically a non story, except that Trump is afraid of him... don't ever lose sight of that... How anybody could be afraid of that toothless lion is beyond me, but he is....

 

This is easy. When the President of the United States tells you that's enough, the conversation is over. The White House interns in the press room should be issued a cattle prod when asswaggons like Acosta choose to make fools of themselves.

 

And what would you call it?

 

The BS stores that CNN comes up with, yea Trump is really afraid of that.

 

3 mostly classless people taking up bandwidth...

 

Yup, but your failure is wanting to deal out blame, when all Acostatard had to do was simply adhere to protocol and "STOP" forcing another question and kindly and professionally hand the mic to the aide doing her job..

Case closed!

 

So this is your justification for Acostatards behavior towards the aide doing her job.

Cool story bro!

 

Did it sound like a 'justification'? You clearly cannot read.

 

So where did Trump physically touch anyone? To be accurate, he calmly called for the "Next" questioner and Acostatard "Refused" to give up the mic and the things escalated from there!

There was one aggressor and that was Acostatard, you want to justify his soul choice to "Hold Tight" to the mic as partly Trumps fault, with some ridiculous claim "The two aggressors were Trump and Acosta" when that is not even remotely the facts, then that nonsense is on you slick

 

Women assaulters are like anti-Semites, very welcome on the Left.

 

The Left is very comfortable with women assaulters.

Sassy Jim lost his Whitehouse Press Pass and I noticed he didn't try his assaultive behavior on the Secret Service when they barred him. Why is that? If he had such a right to the mic that he could forcibly retain it, does he not have an equal right to press room? Why will he use forceful behaviour to assert his rights against a 100lb woman but not a 220 lb Secret Service agent. Is Sassy Jim a woman hating coward?

 

"Critics say" is all that is necessary any longer. Nobody cares about the truth. We fight with accusations.

 

Yes but there was no doctored video.

That lie has been debunked and crushed


Acosta was wrong and the videos prove that.

 

That is a bald faced lie.

She clearly attempted to take the microphone which was white house property and which Acosta has no right to.

 

False.

 

People can be aggressive without laying a hand on anyone. Those people are still agressors.

 

In this case it isn't the same, Trump dismissed Acostatard, Trump was ignorant with Acostatard but bottom line is Acostatard was physically "Reluctant" to relinquish possession of the mic.. Spin however you like, fast frame. slow frame, HD, SD it doesn't change the position of his hand, or the pulling back the mic to his chest and then forcing the aides arm down at the elbow..

It is what it is..

 

He assaulted her sexually?

 

Physical with the aid? What? Only snowflakes see that as an assault.