Ya I know even though it literally is impossible to say anything nice , that is true about Trump , you still expect the media to support him. My opinion is they are way way to easy on this pig.
We should insist that he keep the time frame no longer than the Whitewater investigation which lasted 4 years. Mueller is about 15 months into it so he has another 33 months to go.
Ken Starr took 4 years to investigate a two bit backwater land deal where everybody lost their asses and came up with a lying about a blow job charge. Now all of a sudden the right wing radio hacks and the rest of the GOP faithful are squealing about Mueller taking 15 months....Get a grip.
You don't know that. There's a difference between not being able to charge someone vs. holding off on filing charges while you continue towards a Complete investigation. How many people have flipped on Trump in just the last couple of months? How many tapes of him are floating around? Mueller could probably charge Don Jr. any time he wanted for that 'adoption' meeting he lied about. You really have no idea what you're talking about. None of us do, but those who presume to look like jokes.
I really don't care if they support him or not. I do care they will not provide any positive news to go along with the bad
We know about Russians meddling in our election. Been happening for decades. I thought you were pointing out Americans involved in collusion and election meddling with Russia.
The only "joke" is this laughable Mueller 'investigation', which has already dragged out more than 50% longer than the Nuremburg Trials of Nazi leaders after World War II.... It's an expensive joke, too. By June 1st, according to a Department of Jusitice report published by liberal, Democrat-friendly Time magazine, this farce had already cost $16,700,000. And, as I said (your denial notwithstanding), it has produced absolutely NOTHING to charge Donald Trump with at all.... Link: http://time.com/5298205/robert-mueller-russia-probe-cost-trump/ So, the question du jour is: which is going to last longer, the war in Afghanistan, or, the Mueller 'investigation'...? .
Like I said in Post #36 (above): "So, the question du jour is: which is going to last longer, the war in Afghanistan, or, the Mueller 'investigation'...? ." . The 'tab' for all this Mueller fun is probably closing in on TWENTY MILLION BUCKS by now... time to "sh*t or get off the pot".... To refresh your memory, Bill Clinton was IMPEACHED for lying (perjury) to a grand jury, and obstruction of justice... not for getting a blowjob. So, Donald Trump has been indicted for something involved in "Russia meddling"...? How the hell did I fail to pick up on that...?! Why haven't the impeachment proceedings gotten underway already?!
He was lying about a blowjob, I don’t care if he did it in front of a grand jury or the Queen of England. It all broke down to a consensual blowjob. My point was, that this blowjob charge was not what Starr was hired to find out, but that’s what he ended up recommending impeachment for. Also, before the blowjob heard round the world fell into Starr and his boys laps, he had investigated Clinton for over 3 years without being able to hang anything on him...Now you kooks are whining about Mueller taking too long. What a bunch of gas bag hypocrites. Get a life.
Ha! The only thing that has been "dragged" is the time-frame of this Mueller 'investigation'. The 'goalposts' started out with the screeching Democrat mantra that "the Russians hacked the election for Trump!" Remember? It devolved down into digging into piddly, unrelated crap that one of Trump's campaign execs did in collusion with the government of Ukraine over ten years ago.... RUSSIA?! MOVING THE GOALPOSTS?!
I was asked for evidence Mueller had handed out indictments for Russian interference. He had. Whether or not the campaign itself was involved, that is still being investigated. We know for a fact now that the campaign attempted to collude with Russia and that they were in communication with WikiLeaks about the timing of the release. The only question is whether or not they cemented the deal, although the simple attempt, which we know Mueller is still questioning people about, could be enough for conspiracy charges. As for Manafort, his charges go into 2016 -- they are not limited to "ten years ago." And 5 minutes worth of homework would have told you the way in which his Ukrainian work was related to Putin. He even wrote himself about how it was to the benefit of Putin. Your talking points have gotten stale.
You can try to spin this any way that pleases you, Jack. The truth, which I've already posted (and which is the actual HISTORY of what Bill Clinton did) is that "Bill Clinton was IMPEACHED for lying (perjury) to a grand jury, and obstruction of justice... not for getting a blowjob." "After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice." Link: https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/president-clinton-impeached The fact of the matter is that Bill Clinton hung himself! And the self-inflicted damage, including Articles of Impeachment, all occurred in 1997 - 1998. Now, back to the 21st-century and Mueller's slow-motion 'fishing expedition' - how much longer is this farce going to go ON?!
Lots of your 'opinion', subjective assumptions, selective 'analysis', etc. Did you possibly forget that DEMOCRATS promoted, paid for, and instigated the "Steele Dossier" upon which this whole poorly-constructed house of 'investigation' cards was erected? That much is FACT.... Really, though, in my nasty little secret, heart-of-hearts, I hope that Mueller keeps this circus going for many months more to come! With the passing of each additional day it merely becomes ever clearer to those of us with triple-digit IQ's that this whole Democrat-inspired 'investigation' ploy is nothing but laughably implausible NONSENSE....
1. Is there an official statement saying (I'm paraphrasing) "We have reason to believe the Trump presidential election campaign colluded with the Government of the Russian Federation"? 2. If there are potential charges and/or crimes by specific individuals that are uncovered by the investigation but not directly related to the collusion charge, a smaller investigation led by another individual (somebody below Mueller) should be launched.
Not much opinion in what I said. Just facts. Despite what the Trump cult is telling you, truth actually is truth. As for the Steele Dossier, no, I didn't forget it (can you make it through even one post without a blatant logical fallacy like that?). I've said multiple times that the Dems should be investigated too.
If that scary creature had of gotten end no telling what would have happened. So I am glad Trump won, but I didn't vote and haven't voted for years. I don't have any hope left for this nation or faith in any of its so called leaders, but did have a little hope for Trump and still do compared to the dems he is an angle in comparison.