No you haven't. Try again nicely and I will post a reference for gun death rates per capita in every state since it is so impossible you to find on your own
The post was indeed read in its entirety. But it had very little of relevance contained within it. If the united states federal government were authorized to set a maximum cost for firearm permits, any future administration would then be authorized to raise the cost to whatever arbitrary determined amount it deemed fit. Such would be nothing more than a defacto method of prohibiting firearms ownership without actually having to implement the legislation required to do such. It was already done in the district of columbia once before, so it is not out of the question of being a possibility. Then demonstrate such. Recognizing that such is not the case by virtue of the permit making the individuals less prone to violence. Countless millions of individuals in the united states are issued licenses to operate motor vehicles on a public right of way, and yet they still engage in reckless, dangerous, and outright illegal behavior regardless of such. Therefore a permit requirements for firearms would be no different, and thus not worth even considering. Pray tell how would such be accomplished in this regard?
The above ultimately boils down to little more than the inability on the part of yourself to actually explain how either the ownership, or the possession, of a firearm does anything to threaten either the rights, or well being of others.
I have asked you to post your data non Alaska - now several times. You seem reluctant to do that. I have to wonder why.
Gun Ban Sweden, the land where when you buy a machine gun they give you free hand grenades. "Mr. Zuniga had complained about the changes in Varby Gard, frustrated that the police did not have better control, friends said. A music lover, he no longer went out to concerts at night, said Hugo Garrido, 60, a close friend." "The influx of heavy weapons has caught Sweden’s criminal justice systems unprepared." THE NEW YORK TIMES, Hand Grenades and Gang Violence Rattle Sweden’s Middle Class, By Ellen Barry and Christina Anderson, March 3, 2018. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/03/03/world/europe/sweden-crime-immigration-hand-grenades.html
That’s pretty uninformed statement. Can you think of anyone who was ever shot and killed by a gun that was NOT in the possession of “ Someone”. Guns don’t usually float around looking for people to kill in there own.
Was merely having a gun in one's possession the proximate cause of someone getting shot, or did someone have to actually pull the trigger?
What is being described on the part of yourself is the use of a firearm, not merely the ownership or possession of a firearm. Do try again, and actually make an effort to demonstrate how it is only the possession or ownership of a firearm that does anything to violate the rights and well being of others, rather than the use of a firearm.
Not so much the rights but certainly the existence of others. I hope no one is ever near you when you are having a really bad day like so often tends to happen on a daily basis over there
The US likes gun deaths, it sees them as entertainment. Just look at Hollywoods output for an affirmation of that fact
Hollywood certainly likes them - and the Democrats who rule our deadly urban Hell Holes must like them too.
In the rest of the civilised world gun control is a health and safety issue that totally trumps petty national party politics plain and simple.