We finally hear from the Mueller team

I know you would. Just hearing the Mueller time! meme still gets 'em fired up.:: It's time alright, but I doubt either side will get what it's been hoping for. Unless the prospect of 2 more years of legislative stalemates and endless congressional hearings is something that a person finds appealing.

 

Turner, just because you assert something does not make it so.

 

Since no one of any importance or power is saying "impeach him now", we can ignore such Npc comments from those on the right who are suggesting such a nonsense idea and those who support those who suggesting it.

Besides, Trump is far better off sitting as a political target for the Dems until election day next year.

 

So (D)'s don't mind having a Kremlin spy in the oval office for 2 more yrs ... 'cause maybe they can beat him in 2020?

 

Fallacy of false statement. Prove it, PI.

Once he is out of office, he can be beaten, and he will be.

Notice that a weakened President like Clinton or Carter or Trump still has vast power, not the least he can't be indicted.

That will end before February 2021.

 

That the Mueller report clearly states that Trump is innocent of obstruction of justice, and that there was no evidence at all that could prove him guilty. This was someone made up by Barr his "summaries". And now he's busy redacting anything in the report that says otherwise.

 

Do I need to explain what YOU posted ... to you? (D) congress does suspect, and Adam Schiff swears, that Trump colluded with Russia, AND that he can PROVE it. So ... just keep investigating 'cause maybe you'll need that Russiagate "insurance policy" in 2021? Vlad's puppet doesn't pose any threat in the 2 yr interim?

 

What are the names of these hillary supporters who are squeeling to the NYT?

 

Yes ... you've said that quite a lot. You've said nothing else at all really. Keep me posted, I find NPC cultural trends fascinating.

 

A few times, yes. When you can make comments pertinent to the discussion I can then respond.

 

That's right JS ... I cannot refute "NPC". Nor will I try. "NPC" doesn't detract from the validity of my assertions.

 

Thank you for admitting your assertions are assertions, and thus, they have no validity. They are your opinion only, nothing more.

 

Thank you for not responding directly or addressing anything specifically. This exchange has grown quite

 

I agree. They can't defend Trump, but they idolize him. That's a cult. Take a look at the threads that interest them. "I trust my gun more than I trust you." "America does not have a violence or gun problem. America has a black problem."

These people chose our President. Never again.

 

These are some reactions from Trump fans regarding an un-redacted version of the Mueller Report going to Congress.

Perhaps one or more will answer a question for me. Why do Trump's fans oppose an un-redacted version of the Mueller Report going to Congress?

Don't give me some B.S. about grand jury testimony or classified information. Grand jury testimony can be released by a judge and selected members of Congress received classified intelligence nearly every day.

So, answer the question ... if you have the balls.

 

I was responding to the story about some associates of the mueller team story in The NY Times.

I am all for releasing all that the law allows for to the public. Let me ask you, why are you for Barr and the DOJ violating the laws and rules?

 

We oppose an unredacted report going to congress because:

1) it would be illegal, and
2) congress would leak it within 10 minutes to MSNBC.

 

Can be released by a judge doesn't mean should be released by a judge.

Democrats should be careful what they wish for. If the entire unredacted version ever did come out, it will likely backfire in many ways as it will reveal their abuse of power, their intrusive behavior into people's personal lives and privacy, and also reveal the conspiracy to commit treason by overturning the election, before and after, and who did it.

 

Did they teach you to build straw men in college?

I mentioned your completely unsourced article and you counter that claiming I dont want to see an unredacted (which violates federal law) report?


I see the game now. The violent leftist are going to cry and whine for an unredacted report. Then, if they get it, they will cry and whine some more about Barr violating federal law concerning the secrecy of grand jury testimony and deliberations.

 

Because I am not inclined to supply any more people for Naddled to harass in perpetuity. And if you think they won't harass the crap out of anyone with an R after their names in the report that appeared before the grand jury or was mention by amy one who did testify, you've been asleep for the last forty years.

 

Always with the anonymous sources... "members of the investigation team".. read journalists from the NYTs who is losing money faster than Al Gore's luxury apt building in Miami.... because they no longer have their golden egg to write about... I think that fairly encapsulates the "who" part of those "investigators". Oh, and if not, most were DNC operatives who either worked for, or outsourced for the HRC campaign. It's why Mueller hired them in the first place. And now? What? Clearly, they are legally required to hold their secrets, so if any were to slip and whisper to the NYTs, it's a felony. Or did we forget that part?

 

An incumbent president with a long list of positive accomplishments versus a Dem Party that has spent most of its time chasing a phantom Russian collusion narrative.

You might just want to check yourself in to a Motel 6 for the weekend with a few bottles of Tequila, orange juice and some ripe avocados.

 

JakeStarkey said: ↑
Thank you for admitting your assertions are assertions, and thus, they have no validity. They are your opinion only, nothing more.

 

Tax cut for the rich. Waste of tax payer money on presidential emoluments. Money laundering. Family and friends in bed with the Russians. A sex predator. No wall. Not much of anything of positive, you are right.