What does the belief of evolving to fit our environment have to do with the facts I mentioned that prove that there is a Creator?
There is no evidence in the fossil record for macroevolution, which is defined as one species changing into another species.
There are always natural limits to biological change. Natural selection is just that-selection. It cannot create anything new; it can only select from the information contained in the organism's genetic blueprint. The first assertion of macroevolution is that living matter came from non-living matter. There is only one problem with that; it has been shown to be impossible. the scientific method requires repeatable observation to prove something, yet despite scientist's earnest attempts, even baseless claims, they have never been able to create life from non-life. It is unscientific and inaccurate for evolutionists to claim that spontaneous generation occurred-that is, that nonliving chemicals produced living organisms sometime in the distant past.
Perhaps you'd like to tell us what you understand about either that Einstein did not. Really? You think when theists say "God" they mean the laws of physics? Certainly that would serve dogmatic atheists very well; humanity at large, not so much.
Thank you for establishing that you have no meaningful subject matter knowledge when it comes to fossils and the process of fossilization.
No I wouldn't. It has nothing to do with the subject of the thread. No. I didn't say that. I explained what I would call god. What is the point of arguing against what I didn't say?
You have presented no facts or evidence to even suggest there MIGHT be a creator, let alone prove that there is one. Lol
I believe the Bible because it fits together like a puzzle piece. we all come from somewhere, we are imperfect, in human laws bad things that people do have consequences. That is why the gospel makes sense.
