Mueller: Trump Could Be Charged with Obstruction of Justice After Leaving Office

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Arkanis, Jul 24, 2019.

  1. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,919
    Likes Received:
    63,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mueller said he believe it was unconstitutional to indict a sitting President, he was clear about that, that is the only reason Trump was not indicted
     
  2. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mueller said no such thing.
     
  3. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,919
    Likes Received:
    63,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    what other reason did he give?
     
  4. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,919
    Likes Received:
    63,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    about what?
     
  5. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look at you - caught making a statement you know is not true. Again.
     
  6. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,919
    Likes Received:
    63,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    look at you making a statement about people that is not true again
     
  7. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :lol:
    You know you cannot quote Mueller where he said the prohibition by the OLC is "the only reason Trump was not indicted".
    Thus, you know what you posted is not true.
    :lol:
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2019
  8. Badaboom

    Badaboom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    3,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your life as a lefty, of course.
     
  9. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,919
    Likes Received:
    63,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    he said, they did not even consider it because of the OLC memo

    now if you can show me another reason, please do

    otherwise your wrong and you know it
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2019
  10. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for confirming you knew Mueller did not say "the only reason Trump was not indicted", and thus, confirming you knew your statement was false when you posted it.
     
  11. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Typical Democrat denial-syndrome. The last time I checked Trump was not in jail, and, it is the crudball, America-hating Democrat Party whose operatives are coming under microscopic legal scrutiny for leveraging their bought-and-paid-for "Steele Dossier" into a fraud 'investigation' and witch hunt designed to sabotage the legitimate government of the United States.

    This is obviously a form of back-stabbing TERRORISM, Freshy... and don't you share the opinion that all terrorists who operate against the government of the United States should be rounded up, shipped off to Gitmo, and KEPT THERE, indefinitely...?
     
  12. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. The reason that Trump wasn't indicted was because Mueller said yesterday that his team did "not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime."

    That means there was insufficient evidence and therefore no crime.

    Try to keep up.
     
  13. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,139
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Everyone knows we didn't all vote in one election.
     
  14. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,139
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He could bring charges which would then be prosecuted when the President left office, more likely like Clinton plea bargained but since the DOJ including the OLC has already stated there was no obstruction of justice it's a moot point.
     
  15. Texas Republican

    Texas Republican Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    28,121
    Likes Received:
    19,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. I’ve driven by Gettysburg many times, but never stopped.
     
  16. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,139
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Binging up charges, which he is free to do and had a duty to do, is not the same as handing him an indictment and ordering him to appear in court which would have to wait and anyway had nothing to do with the declination by the DOJ.
     
  17. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wait....wasn't that what got Hillary off on the server fiasco and the Right went crazy about 'intent'?
     
  18. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, what got Hillary off the hook are the same people who were trying to take Trump out.

    That's why they they've all been fired.

    Having classified information on an unclassified system that you own is a federal crime. Period t. Black and white.

    The same government officials were trying to elect Clinton regardless of the facts, and convict Trump, regardless of the facts.

    That's why we HAVE the "Russia investigation".
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2019
    PrincipleInvestment likes this.
  19. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, it was FBI Lawyer Baker who decided (after some convincing) that she didn't have the necessary 'knowledge or criminal intent' to be charged.

    I agree with you that she got a pass, but the issue is the same. How does one prove the mindset of an individual.
     
  20. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you own a computer, and that computer has classified information on it, you have committed a crime.

    That's an actual crime that there is evidence of.

    On the other hand, a DNC employee says Russia hacked their server, and Hillary Clinton paid millions of dollars to say Trump was working with Russia on the hack.

    Good luck with that analogy.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2019
    PrincipleInvestment likes this.
  21. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,968
    Likes Received:
    4,954
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I agree with the first part. Not sure why you keep repeating it because the actual merit of the case is immaterial. I don't care if it's actually a crime or not (even though it is). I'm saying that the defense is the same and it's impossible to tell one way or the other without a smoking gun.
     
  22. Nunya D.

    Nunya D. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    10,193
    Likes Received:
    2,797
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not properly securing classified documents and/or Negligence does not require criminal intent.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2019
  23. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, the defense is not the same.

    In case 1 a crime was committed and ignored.

    In case 2, the same government took fake information from the opposing candidate and tried to knowingly use it against the other candidate.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2019
  24. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I and my family really enjoyed it there. There is a very good museum on site. But when I was there the weather was great and hiking around at least got us exercise.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2019
  25. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    150,919
    Likes Received:
    63,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    that is what he said, if you can give another reason he gave, feel free to share, maybe I missed it
     

Share This Page