Veritas Strikes Again: Exposes CNN's 'Anti-Trump Crusade' Zucker's 'Personal Vendetta' Against Trump

Apparently asking 4 any evidence to support someone's claim is attacking CNN.

I take it as someone just saying words without really understanding their meaning.

 

As has msm. But if msm or veritas has hard evidence your argument is irrelevant. All that matters are fact and evidence if truth is relevant.

 

Thanks for the guffaws.

 

yes I apologize.

I didn't attack CNN so you lied when you said I did.

no need to apologize I don't read links I don't click on links it's not my burden to go chase down your argument.

If I want to verify your argument then I would click on the link and read it. but just posting gibberish and saying click on the gibberish and go to this website is not an argument, that's just being lazy.

I don't click links to chase down your argument that's not how this works.

What's the equivalent of telling me to read a book. It's a boneheaded attempt to wiggle out of your lies.

so the question now isn't whether or not you're being honest cuz clearly you're not. It is whether or not you're trying to lie to yourself.

 

But THIS direct and blatant?

 

What are you doubting here? Has NBC challenge the authenticity of the recordings? Have you listened to the whistleblower? I thought all whistleblowers were to be protected and believed?

 

My lack of desire to type out a novel (novel in its use here should be taken as hyperbole) of Veritas’ disgusting behavior is no measure of how honest my intentions are. If you don’t care to read a link you’re well within your right, but calling me dishonest is inaccurate. A tad bit lazy? Sure. I’ll cop to that.

 

This particular whistleblower has a documented history of federal crimes under their belt. Like I said, I trust them as far as I can throw them.

 

What's the fraud here. The whistleblower came to them with his own recordings from what I am hearing. I'm watching him being interviewed, he is not trying to hide from the public like other alleged whistleblowers, he seems very sincere, very disappointed in what he learned about CNN while working there and simply wants to expose the truth. Is he lying? I don't claim to be a lie-detector but I have no reason to doubt him or that he somehow faked the videos and audios. Any statements from CNN or Zucker claiming they are fake or edited to be out of context? Not that I have seen.

 

The guy who worked for CNN has a history of federal crimes?

 

it would really just be a sentence or two. But it's okay I think you can't find those words because you are full of it and you know you are.

Now I think you're hiding behind laziness to excuse incompetence.

 

I already had this conversation with Poly. Read through that if you want my take, or don’t.

P.S.
There are links to fact and source checking sites. If you feel you won’t be interested in clicking any of those then save yourself the time and pursue a target that’s interested in typing out a novel.

 

I mistook who you were referring to. The founder of Project Veritas has plead guilty to federal crimes. Not the subject from CNN.

 

I always knew. "Leftists" run MSM. It's all about ideology over anything. That's how they roll. Mind you, Liberals are different and not corrupt, just misguided. "Leftists" like the CNN, Liz Warren, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden brands are in line with the CNN / MSM types. They work and live together. Their family ties are incestuous. They are the elite. If you look at Leftist MSM and Democratic politicians/leaders you will see a lot of marriages, brothers, and sisters. They are about Power and Control.

 

So? His crimes have nothing to do with the content of videos. They have to do with how he obtained them. He captured the weirdos/bad guys in their own words.

 

more fake news from Veritas

msnbc and fox are the true partisian news networks

and Trump wants you to only get your news from the government, the Trump network... lies 24\7

 

Fine. I’ll take your bait.

O'Keefe has been charged and prosecuted by federal officials. He and three others pled guilty in 2010 after they engaged in an effort to trespass and bug the offices of U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu went awry

Fraud·u·lent
/ˈfrôjələnt/
adjective
obtained, done by, or involving deception, especially criminal deception.
Dis·hon·est
/disˈänəst/
adjective
behaving or prone to behave in an untrustworthy or fraudulent way.

Not dishonest, not incompetent, just lazy.

 

we know the Trump supporters are.....

 

All over America. Laughing at you Hillary supporters lol

 

Outright lies and falsehoods lead me to believe their content cannot be trusted. Maybe they’re telling the truth, but I’ll not know because they have proven themselves untrustworthy far too many times to lend them any credence.

 

So let’s break this down. A guy who provides video and is willing to go on TV can’t be believed, but the mere news of a unnamed whistle blower is enough to start impeachment proceedings against Trump.

This line of thought carries over to watching a guy on video bragging about strong arming a country all while the people who deny he’s strong arming anyone blame Trump for strong arming that same country when no proof exists.

 

I know when you accuse someone a fraud you don't just define the term.

But I see you can't do that so go ahead and hide behind laziness to mask your incompetence it's okay.

I really don't want you to be competent I want you to continue to shuck and jive and pull this dishonest crap. All I have to do is keep you talking and you discredit yourself, outside of your echo chamber that is.

 

yep, they are a sick bunch

 

Hillary is not running in 2020, you guys can't get over the fact she got millions more votes then your guy can ya

 

You can't get over the fact that she lost! lol