Lock her up! ... Lock her up!... Lock her... oh oh...

No. I based it on the fact that Trump yet again failed to deliver another campaign promise. "Lock her up" follows the same demise as "Build that wall", "Mexico will pay for it", "Drain the swamp", "Kill Obamacare", ... and all the nonsense his base believed he would actually do.

 

I don't have to. The Trump's Justice Department, State Department (twice), the FBI, Congress.... they all already did that for me.

 

How do you explain this?
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/hillary-clinton-justice-department-investigation-results

Why don't you just admit it? You fell for it hook line and sinker. Thee is no way they could say she is innocent. They might not say anything or make excuses, but innocent, it ain't going to happen. The FBI report detailed her activities and it was clearly against the law.

 

What about it?

This thread is not about her being innocent or not. It's about her not being "locked up" like Trump promised.

 

That does not jive with this:

 

How does that not jive? It's the reason stated by the source I sent why they won't "lock her up".

You want to criticize my style now? I pass....

You're getting to that point again where your posts lack any substance and, therefore, no interest.

BTW, the link of the source I used is one of many. I just thought that if I sent MSNBC or CNN the most superficial posters would use that as their strawman. I always try to avoid strawman hoping that shallow-minded right wing posters stay on topic. But sometimes I underestimate your abilities to devise strawman arguments.

Trump failed to deliver! Again! After all the promises... after all those "you'll see when the Huber investigation concludes".... Hillary is still free. While Trump's close advisers are in jail (or on their way). And we're just waiting for the DoJ protection of Trump to end so ... we can see what happens (not making any predictions)

That's the point! Have anything to say about it? No? Then... thanks for playing.

 

You started a thread entitled "Lock her up! ... Lock her up!... Lock her... oh oh..."
And the title of the article is:
"SURPRISE, SURPRISE: THE DOJ’S HILLARY CLINTON INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN A BUST"

You don't even know whether the report even mentions Hilary because you admit you have never seen it. Why don't you just go ahead and admit you got suckered?

 

The title - and the topic is "Lock Her Up" - The email scandal is small potatoes - did she not destroy evidence though ?

A better example of why Hillary should be locked up - is arming Al Qaeda in Syria and then lying about it to congress.

Complicity in War Crimes - and Crimes against Humanity. Now that is a much better charge than smashing a hard drive don't you think ?

 

Got it! I have to see the report on the investigation of Hillary to know that it mentions Hillary. And you will harass me every time you see me "dare" use basic human logic again to reach a conclusion that would be obvious to any moderately intelligent human being.

I'll call that "The Kriman Rule".

 

If that's not the email scandal, I have no idea what you're talking about.

But the bottom line is that they didn't find anything to "lock her up" about. Or they wouldn't be abandoning the investigation with no charges: Nothing means nothing. No email, no Uranium One, no Pizzagate, .... nothing.

Hillary Clinton will go down in history as the most exonerated politician ever.

 

You haven't seen the report. You are taking Vanity Fairs word for it. Pure logic says that the report is not going to say that Hilary did not commit a crime. First of, it is my understanding that the investigation was of the FBI. However, my primary reason for doubting that the report clears Hilary is that there is little doubt that Hilary did break he law. The FBI clearly shows that she had multiple classified documents on an insecure server. That is against several federal laws on security which requires all storage devices to have security commensurate with the highest level of classified material stored. Not only was the server not certified for that purpose, it was located in an insecure location.

I have no idea if or why they are not pursuing Hilary for breaking the law. I am convinced that report is not going clear her of anything.,

 

Hard to lock her up when she owns everyone.

 

Exonerated? Bull.

 

I knew it! I knew Bill Barr would be booted into the Deep State Conspiracy Theory before the week was over.

Trump loyalists are as predictable as... as chlamydia in an orgy.

 

Yawn.

.

 

What's worse, a server that supposedly has classified material, or the continued use of an unsecured cell phone that every enemy of the United States can hack into and eavesdrop on the president's conversations?

 

It was not a server which supposedly had classified material. It had classified material.

Classified information should not be discussed on any non-secure phone.

 

Can you cite Trump's quote wherein he promised to lock up Hillary?

 

There is ZERO evidence that Trump conversed on an "unsecured" phone, just accusations by his political opponents who have also accused him of paying prostitutes to urinate in a bed and who claimed that he conspired with President Putin to steal the election from Hillary.

Conversely, Hillary has been caught, red-handed, engaged in 100+ felonies and the left is in denial and continuously parrots that she was "exonerated" and "cleared", which is a flat-out LIE. President Obama was the most corrupt president we've ever had and oversaw the most lying, corrupt administration in American history. Furthermore, Obama and his leftist goons at the DOJ/FBI/CIA/IRS/NSA, etc., etc., etc. weaponized those agencies and used them to persecute their political opponents and spy on journalists.

Don't believe the claim that liberals oppose a police-state. The fact is, liberals don't have a problem with a police-state, as long as they're the ones running it.

 

She was not exonerated for lying to congress about arming radical Islamist's - led by Al Qaeda - in Syria.

That history has already been written - how arming these groups led to the death of over 400,000, war crimes and crimes against humanity

 

Hillary serves a very good purpose. Conservatives seem to be lured into a mental pit of which they can not escape. The bubble has deluded them into thinking Trump is invincible. After all, look how easily he beat Hillary. Have of them are blind to facts of the election in 2018. As long as they cling to the fabricated Hillary scandals, they blind themselves to the political energy in the country, that isn’t on their side. Unless there is a massive cheat in the works, I just don’t see Trump surviving the election.

 

They are coming to get you who ha who ha, they’re coming to take you away, who ha, who ha, and over the hills we go, who ra, who ra........

 

Trump also promised to show his tax returns once he was elected. Right after the phony audit was over. He will be out of office before anyone sees his tax returns, if ever.

But if we could see his tax returns, we would see the results of the most brilliant financial genius that ever lived. It will show the greatest companies with the best deals. It is so beautiful, you can’t believe, how beautiful it is. Oh so beautiful. And big, oh so big. The biggest tax return ever.

 

Perhaps the proper spelling is..."uuugg"