WATCH LIVE | Impeachment trial of President Trump continues in Senate (Day 3)

Delete duplicate

 

Using republican rules for investigations, first Bidens lawyer gets to interview him lol

 

Using democrats rules for investigations, first interview him in the basement in secret without allowing counsel then go on TV and leak selective sound bites.

 

So far that’s way more than Biden has been allowed.

 

You mean being allowed to skate with the dem clown show defending you with lies?

 

Got to make that money - can't be bothered with testifying and defending his client.

 

Oh good, finally. Sylvia Garcia is now promising to "prove" that all Trump's intentions had to do with the 2020 election. This should be good.

 

Just curious, but can you provide a theoretical example of the type of evidence you would consider to be proof?

 

Facts, not inference or presumption.

 

That money like the Biden's made which was over a billion dollars?

 

Just another few days and its all will be forgotten!

 

Well, no, because I read he call transcript. There is nothing in it indicating that Trump had a self-serving interest at heart versus simply keeping his promise to supporters to uncover corruption.

Democrats picked the wrong charges for Article I. They should have kept digging for something illegal and real, not assumed.

 

I'll trade you Rudy's testimony to ole Joe Bite_me and his Jr. Agreed?

 

Right after Biden voluntarily give it to him?

 

It is totally cool. There's nothing to be learned or gained by staying there and looking at Nadler.

 

Much of that room last attended a high school class during the Eisenhower administration... maybe they're due for a refresher?

The point in your bold has been proven... the only thing left is..... well, actually there's nothing left..

 

Unlike many here that have never had a class in civics?

 

I am not asking if there is anything in the currently available transcripts, I am asking if you can identify a single hypothetical example of such evidence.

 

You have failed to answer that question multiple times. You fail again here.

 

Surely Rudy already has it.... trump wouldn’t be asking for an investigation with no evidence

 

Show everyone where the dems have proven corrupt intent with actual facts. You can't.

 

A B-b-b-b-b-b-b-billion!?!?!

 

Which of course Giuliani has and will be releasing soon.

 

To the senate I assume? Wouldn’t that help trumps defense?

 

This is yet another failure to answer the question.

I am asking for a hypothetical example. Allow me to try and give you some help: "I think a hypothetical example of such proof would be evidence that Trump told John Bolton, 'I want to withhold the aid to Ukraine because I am worried that Biden will beat me in the 2020 election and Ukraine could provide me fake dirt which would help my re-election.'"