No, we dont. These are red herrings imo that you are throwing at us to be difficult because you like to argue... like most of us.
They are not the same. This guy is saying no one should have a .223 AR15 because they are too powerful. Tripe. Is what that is.
I wish I could say I was, but this actually isn't. It's type/token distinction. If you have two tokens of type X, but each token of X is unique from the other, then it can't be the case, that you have two tokens of X. You're trying to say X=X+1 That's not going to be true no matter what. It's a contradiction of terms.
They wouldn't take them from your children since they will never have them. Not that you have any of those guns. Such a silly argument, assuming your kids would even want them.
One of my best days as a grandfather was teaching my two grandsons age12 & 14 to build their own. AR15's. Their first day at the range it would take a belt sander to get the smile off their faces.
I love the way liberals demonize the NRA. It is usually a reminder to me to contribute to the NRA ILA. However, today it is a reminder to renew my membership which is close to expiring.
The ignorent left has yet to figure out it is not the NRA that pisses in the governments Wheaties, they are funded by its members. It is the NSSF who is funded by the gun manufacturers.
Okay. So is it your ghost guns that you want to pass on or is it something else? Likewise, silly argument against a gun registration law that has zip to do with whatever restriction you are talking about. If you have a gun that can't be transferred legally, then clearly you just want less ways for the law to catch you illegally transferring / selling weapons.
I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. They are not "ghost guns" every lower is serialized. Side note, I can legally build and own a gun from scratch with no serial number and no forms to fill out.
Agree. Dont have to need one, just have to want one. Sadly mine all sank in that tragic boating accident. I sure will miss them.
Yes, I let mine expire about 4 weeks ago, i was annoyed with the sales calls, still have the envelope on my desk. I think this might be good use of a wee bit of my stimulus money eh? Appreciate the reminder
THe comment was they arent used for hunting because they don't work, when in reality you can get an ar-15 or AR-15 type model with many types of calibers, plenty of which are suitable for hunting including deer.
Exactly, people just don't understand how the law works. You can order an 80% lower, drill a few holes, and boom no registration but you have a ar15. People don't get the regulations are more related to the commerce of them (selling,trading, profiting,etc..)
Ugh. Sad to see ignorance leading the way up here. Trudeau and the Liberals are out to lunch. I am curious to see how he will set up a buyback program without legislation....
Let's be clear.....in my lifetime (I'm in my 60's) to date no gun legislation has called for the confiscation of legally purchased and owned weapons prior to the inaction of new legislation. Gun lobbyist and their sycophants have ballyhooed any and all gun control legislation as a prelude to full confiscation and banning of all weapons for the civilian population. To date that has NOT happened. Canada does as Canada sees fit...whether or not this new legislation will stand with the population remains to be seen. But as I've said before, I'll take Canada's gun fatality rate as a country to that of some of our major US cities any day of the week.
Please show the readers the proposed legislation in the 1980's that is exactly like what Canada is doing now. Off hand, I don't remember such.
Proven to be incorrect. The historical examples include NAZI Germany, Soviet Russia, Red China, and Cambodia. Recent examples include Kosovo, Great Britain, Australia, New York, and California. Not having possession of the firearm registered to you can be grounds for prosecution. If you have reported the gun stolen, and it is found in your possession, you can be charged with obstruction of justice, filing a false report, or perhaps a newly created crime for “gun criminals.”
Are you really confused as to why people are worried about a confiscation here when it just happened to our neighbors in the north for over 1500 hundred types of firearms? From what I've learned about it reading around, apparently the legislation allows for further guns to be added based off high level of demand as a replacement for a recently banned gun... which in effect leads to every gun being banned eventually.