Trump should concede now.

Real men like trump hang out with the likes of Jeffery Epstein. Domination of the weaker.
Bragging about it. A little grab here, a little grab there.

 

Concede? Why when he’s got so much evidence? He clearly is holding the real evidence back to make a dramatic showing of it closer to the inauguration. His amazing beautiful evidence will overturn the election. Captain America swooping in to save the day. All hail Trump.

 

We have heard for 6 weeks that the big lawsuits with the indisputable evidence were 2 weeks away

Maybe they are waiting for the military to "raid" some more European servers

 

Uhhh, it's my name up there yeah?

Excuse me? 1. I am not the topic of this thread. 2. Show me your evidence to substantiate your bogus speculation.

Since you pretend to know so much about me, please tell the class what "my side" is.

Except you have no clue and are talking out your ****ing ass.

 

He is about as corrupt as any other politician or big business player.

the only reason he was impeached was because the House had the numbers. The only reason he was not convicted was because the Senate didn't have the numbers. The whole ugly affair was a political **** show that demonstrated to the world the absolute worst of American politics.

 

You have no evidence to substantiate that claim.

Argumentum ad verecundiam. Evidence of nothing.

 

I believe a simple majority is all that is needed to impeach a president in the house.
So, any president can be impeached base on numbers.
But there needs to be a reason. Attempting to bribe a foreign gov't for political dirt on a political rival for political gain is a good reason.

3 impeachments in history. All have been acquitted by the Senate.

I think the cries of fake fraud and voting irregularities is showing the absolute worst of American politics.

 

Judges and courts in at least 5 states substantiate the claim.
The nothing you speak of, is what the trump legal team has presented. Which is why 56 cases were dismissed or not even worthy of being heard.

 

He's got amazing evidence. The best evidence. Evidence like you've never seen before. The evidence is coming in like water. Great, beautiful evidence. It's gonna be yuuuuuge!

But, in all seriousness, the evidence, such as the misinformation in the liberal press, suppression of legitimate journalism by Big Tech, along with the scores of irregularities and shady practices, such as the unnecessary implementation of VBM, keeping Republicans observers at a faraway distance, and more, is well-documented evidence of the corruption used to install the barren-minded empty suit of Biden.

 

The new excuse is that Trump and his loyalists are saving the evidence until after Biden gets inaugurated so that it will be more embarrassing.

 

This video essentially encapsulates the transparency of the 2020 electoral process.



The Washington Post is right: Democracy dies in the darkness.

 

Did you know you are not allowed to video record because of privacy concerns? They were warned to put their cameras away and like typical Trumpers refused to follow directions.

 

Yes, we must keep the corruption in private.

Got it.

 

There is zero likelihood. Zero.

 

They would have been allowed to watch if they followed directions, so who is to blame?

 

Here's you asterisk* Despite the fact that there was zero evidence of any widespread fraud, whatsoever, many millions of ridiculous conspiracy theorists believed it.

Cheers.

I'd like to continue discussing why you are wrong, but I ask you for proof, you're going to babble some incoherent nonsense that made 80+ judges laugh you conspiracy theorists out of court. You conspiracy nuts never think this through. 50+ pro-Trump elected officials and appointed by Trump jurists, in several states laughed you out of court.

For what reason?

 

They would have been allowed to watch the corruption if they had followed directions.

Now that's an amazing statement.

 

Another person with evidence who refuses to show it to Giuliani.

You guys are really silly. You have ALL THIS PROOF, and refuse to show it to the one guy who could bring it in front of a Trump appointed judge. Why are you refusing to send it on? Did you secretly want Biden but with the right to pretend the election was stolen for the next four years? Is that the plan?

 

Had you been curious to read, Curious Always--ironic--you would have spotted the evidence, the well-documented evidence of the corruption: a few posts up, I said, "But, in all seriousness, the evidence, such as the misinformation in the liberal press, suppression of legitimate journalism by Big Tech, along with the scores of irregularities and shady practices, such as the unnecessary implementation of VBM, keeping Republicans observers at a faraway distance, and more, is well-documented evidence of the corruption used to install the barren-minded empty suit of Biden." I would argue that it is cultish to turn a blind eye to this in your devotion to the mainstream narrative.

 

So, the reason the Trump appointed judges refused to hear the credible evidence brought to them by Giuliani, is because they listened to Wolf Blitzer? Why did Trump appoint judges who refuse to listen to facts, and only listen to Wolf Blitzer?

Weird.

 

At the time, he was not a political rival. Just a corrupt retiree, that a sitting president certainly had the authority to investigate.

Considering the evidence of irregularities and unlawful changes to voting rules in many jurisdictions, I agree.

 

The well-documented corruption, such as the prodigal misinformation in the press and the suppression of journalism is not enough grounds to overturn an election in the courts--thus your logic is faulty, sophistic--but that does not make it not corruption; it still is corruption. As for the criminality that was used to install Biden, that was done in the backdrop through VBM, a system notorious for corruption; and we did it on a nationwide scale, and we did not have to do it. VBM allowed the corruption to be done in the darkness; but just because a crime is done in the darkness it does not mean a crime did not occur. For example, Al Capone killed a great many people; but he did so in such a way that the government could only catch him on tax evasion; but simply because he was caught on tax evasion, it does not mean he wasn't a killer.

Additionally, common sense would dictate that Biden, a man who was a constant loser in past presidential campaigns, never making it past the primaries, did not somehow miraculously get more votes than anyone who has ever run for president in history; that is just one of the far-fetched notions, a cultish fascination that you so treasure, yet you call others cultish, projecting your own reality onto them.

 

Mathematically Impossible. Logically Improbable.

 

Funny thing is, I am not the topic of this thread. So save your fallacies.

 

LOL. Nice word salad, and an interesting way to say you agree that Biden won the election, fair & sqaure.

Uh, you should send a letter immediately, to whatever school gave you your degree in statistical probabilities. You failed bigly, and they gave you the pretty diploma, anyway. Oh, maybe you got that degree at Trump U.