The other poster was correct: """someone who can only write one-liners followed by a laughing emoji"""
Thats where you and I will continue to be at loggerheads. Banning abortion cannot be done without violating bodily autonomy. IMO
No, it is to deprive the unborn child inside of her of his/her right to life. SHE exercised her control over her own body when she made the choice to have sex (which can lead to pregnancies). Once she conceives a child, she is no longer making choices that solely affect herself. Her choices are, from that point on, also affecting the unborn child inside of her. It is not right to murder (or "terminate" or "abort" or whatever other kinder-sounding word you wish to use in an attempt to justify it) an unborn child because he/she isn't wanted or isn't convenient.
... as they should be. They are murdering human beings, depriving them of their God-given right to life.
Cancer treatment is an attempt to make a sick/dying person healthy again. Abortion is murdering an "unwanted/inconvenient" unborn child.
. The ZEF has no right to life, the woman does. So you want women punished for having sex and getting pregnant ? That's twisted. Her choices affect HER and HER life and she is the one with rights...
... but mandating people to wear masks is a direct violation of their bodily autonomy... You can't use "but, but it violates bodily autonomy" as an excuse to allow abortions, yet be perfectly okay with violating bodily autonomy when it comes to mask wearing mandates... You are now in paradox.
Why is your "god" alledgedly so concerned about "life" in the womb but doesn't seem to give a damn about life outside of the womb???
Yes I can. A pregnancy termination is not a PUBLIC safety issue. That being said, at no point did I say bodily autonomy was an absolute. There is no paradox if there is no absolute.
The child (or "ZEF" as you call it) has just as much of a right to life as any other human being does. No, I want them punished for murdering their children. Her choices, after conception, also affect her unborn child inside of her.
"God-given" is a saying. It doesn't make reference to any particular god/s. If you wish to make reference to the Christian God, it is "God" with a capital G, as God is a proper noun. Yes, Christianity is a faith based belief. It cannot be proven or disproven. Because God is the creator of life. Human beings are his creation. Your perception that he doesn't give a damn doesn't mean that he doesn't give a damn.
Prove it. Your "god" created everything, right? Then he created MISCARRIAGES which is a fetus DYING,....is he a murderer??? That is probably true...so you want them executed, KILLED. AND that was NOT what you said, you said: """"SHE exercised her control over her own body when she made the choice to have sex (which can lead to pregnancies). Once she conceives a child, she is no longer making choices that solely affect herself.""" "ONCE SHE CONCEIVES" she has her rights taken away(according to YOU),,,,that's PUNISHMENT.... So what? It's her life, not yours.
