We can't be responsible for the Constitutional ignorance of others. Nor are we going to let them mess with the Constitution without knowing what the hell they're doing.
States legislation branches go through procedure to change election laws.... it is not done by Joe Blow just willy nilly changing them to their likings as it happened.
Prove them wrong... it is that simple... "CN are not a credible source" is your opinion and does not have any legal weight, whatsoever.
All these commenters yapping about there not being any fraud are the same ones that screamed bloody murder about Russia Russia Russia Rooshan Coolushan without one *******n bit of evidence, even after Mueller Time couldn't find squat with 30 partisan Democrat lawyers in tow. It's really pathetic. Two so-called expert witnesses. One didn't find fraud....Russia Russia Russia. One did, Maricopa Country election fraud. In both instances, Democrats don't agree with either expert report. If it doesn't fit their narrative....it's deny deny deny. Without the fake news spewing **** all day long and rigged elections, they would lose power for a long long time.
I provided evidence why CN is not a credible source. It's headed by Doug Logan who has a history of backing conspiracy theories. https://www.azmirror.com/2021/03/31...e-steal-advocate-to-lead-2020-election-audit/ Rejecting a source who has a history of backing conspiracy theories which throws his credibility into question is reasonable. If his credibility is in question, it is reasonable to not want to waste time with it. That they are trying to affect the outcome of an election demonstrates they are attempting to parade the effort as having legal force, hence the mention that it is not. In my case, there is no implication, writ large, of legality. Therefore, your attempt to be clever is flat. That is the simple fact.
Mueller was only the tip of the Russia investigation... and no one is in jail for Colluding with the Russian Government to Affect the 2016 election. FBI investigation - In July of 2016 The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence - On January 13, 2017 The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence - On January 25, 2017 The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism - On February 2, 2017 The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform - On February 16, 2017 The Senate Judiciary Committee - On May 17, 2017 Special Counsel - On May 17, 2017 Acquitted on two articles of impeachment - Feb 5, 2020 The Senate Intelligence Committee - August 18, 2020
You have proven nothing....CN is just as credible as any rabbit you can pull out of the hat... Now that is the simple fact Maybe your answer to who YOU think might should maybe could run the audit should maybe have been someone like Glenn Simpson and his company then? He is pretty knowledgeable about the 2016 election dirty dealings. He would have some inside ideas where to look.
Can you give a link? I heard something about an audit from a view potentially sketchy sources, but it didn't contain any basic information, such as whether or not the audit was even carried out by the government to begin with.
In the past our government, and specifically the FBI relied on third party to tell them what the forensic outcome of an audit/investigation was.... So this seems right in line with FBI/government policy of the past... the FBI/government literally did not touch the DNC server and the FBI/government will not go within a country mile of a Dominion machine... relying on third party results...
States make their laws by a certain legislative legal procedure.... the laws were changed and not by legal procedures... they were not changed legislatively like they should have been.. and save the emergency pandemic garbage as they had months to do it by law.
Boy, those Republicans who are a 4-1 majority on the election board must have been really pissed when the minority Democrat swooped in waving his magic wand and took over. For some reason I stopped reading the post at that point.
Link? States have their procedures. No laws were changed without approval of both parties and the election commissions.
That would be a false statement. Governors, Courts and a Secretary of State changed election laws in multiple swing states.
Of course lots and lots of allegations but not a single shred of proof. Where is all the evidence of all this happening. There is proof however that Republican officials in Maricopa county cheated Biden out of at least 300 votes. Who knows how many more votes he got?
That should read "...evidence of any of this happening." "We didn't find anything but these look like maybe they could be suspicious" just isn't a report written by people with a civil agenda.
The Cyber ****ups report did not find fraud. In fact, it confirmed the vote count in Maricopa County, well, +360 votes more in margin for President Biden, who won the state fair and square.
The truth is, the cyber ****ups have won in one way: even by putting out false numbers or numbers out of context, they learned well from Goebbels that if you repeat a lie often enough, people will think it is true and there is no amount of debunking that is going to cause that pig to not want to put lipstick on. So, there's that.
You probably hate to admit it, but there are many examples of the passage of time showing that in many cases conspiracy theory becomes conspiracy fact. There is much evidence and many facts that the election was stolen, but those are all suppressed by mainstream media and deep state players in government.
The audit and report shows definite tampering with the Dominion machines. But "the Audit Guys" blew right over it and trying to baffle us when they touched none of the data in Maricopa county and wrote an opinion piece.