State trooper who told off Inslee over vaccine mandate dies from COVID

So prove Quantum wrong. I guarantee you won't and will just ignore this request because you aren't so good in regards to reading studies, articles and what not as your AZ audit thread proved.

 

He said that the COVID would disappear with the warm weather like a miracle.

 

WOW, Biden's worse off than I thought.

 

Nobody is talking about your fake made up non peer reviewed 257 people garbage. Thats just for the left to flail about with. Its called reeling in the suckers who can be bought off with a simple CNN claim that they couldn't back up with any actual data, Just fake CNN regurgitations for the gullible. And there are millions of them.

People with an IQ higher than a fence post knows of the Israel study with over 2 million participants, in the largest world study to date, in the highest vaccinated population in the world, supported by the same findings at John Hopkins, with over 88% Pfiser vaccinated results.
But you wouldn't know anything about that. It would be beyond your ability to get out of that leftist bubble that keeps you fed with all the leftist tripe.

Not to mention its always obvious when a leftist joins the party thinking they know what peer reviewed data is. Thats how you can tell they are so gullible.
There is no peer review data on actual events like death, hospitalizations, infected, recovered, or injected. Those are not binary things. They are actual events that are not subject to change due to some peer review.

So now that we have determined you don't even know what peer reviewed means or is for, we can move on.

Information like pre infected have much greater immunity than the vaccinated
Millions were infected long before any vaccine was available
Vaccinated are 13 times more likely to be re infected and 20 times more likely to be hospitalized than pre infected with higher immunity.

And no fake leftist peer review claim can change the actual data.

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity
Reports of waning vaccine-induced immunity against COVID-19 have begun to surface. With that, the comparable long-term protection conferred by previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1

Israeli study shows natural immunity delivers 13 times more protection than COVID vaccines
https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/news/israeli-study-shows-natural-immunity-delivers-13-times-more-protection-than-covid-vaccines/

Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine
https://www.science.org/content/article/having-sars-cov-2-once-confers-much-greater-immunity-vaccine-vaccination-remains-vital

Then provide one that isn't out of context. Covid has 3 parameters, not just 2. So for those so gullible to not know the difference, here are the REAL parameters.
Vaccinated who have been infected
Unvaccinated who have been infected
Pre infected who are not vaccinated

The problem is the pre infected line would be lower than the vaccinated since their are millions more than vaccinated.
But that one addition sends your entire graph into a tail spin which is why it isn't included.
Which means a graph like that is just for those who don't know any better.

 

There is no such thing.

Like proof of citizenship?

 

Not to mention the little fact that the Japanese mask up at the drop of a hat...

 

Again, did you fail to ready any of the links you provided as you failed to read the AZ Audit link several days ago??

From your third link, and yes, I read them all, obviously you did not.

So according to YOUR links on the Israel study, it completely proved that having at least one dose of the Pfizer vaccine along with previously being infected gives you far better immunities to Covid than not having any vaccine.

Good god, please read these studies before you continue to embarrass yourself.

 

post #8 was just stating the facts, something many anti-vaxers don't like

 

Zombie lie.

https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...e-with-at-least-4-comorbidities-idUSL1N2TS0S2

The interviewer says to Walensky, “I want to ask you about those encouraging headlines that we’re talking about this morning. This new study showing just how well vaccines are working to prevent severe illness. Given that, is it time to start rethinking how we’re living with this virus? That it’s potentially here to stay?”

Walensky replies, “You know really important study if I may just summarize it. A study of 1.2 million people who were vaccinated between December and October and demonstrated that severe disease occurred in about 0.015% of the people who received their primary series and death in 0.003% of those people. The overwhelming number of deaths, over 75%, occurred in people who had at least four comorbidities. So really these are people who were unwell to begin with. And yes, really encouraging news in the context of Omicron.”

The initial part of her response, that gave details of the study - including the small percentage of deaths, was not included in a clip shared widely on social media (here).

Oh, hell. Did I just torpedo your bullshit narrative at the waterline?

 

LOL

My "fake made up non peer reviewed 257 people garbage" is EXACTLY what we are talking about. Didn't you read it?

It also concludes that people who were previously infected and vaccinated did better than those who were unvaccinated.

 

I already did prove him wrong. The graph is nothing more than taking information out of context for the gullible who would just take it as fact.

If you want a graph to promote an outcome, you have to have all the data. Not just the portion to make a political point.

For a graph like that you need all 3 Covid inputs
Vaccinated who have been infected
Unvaccinated who have been infected
Unvaccinated Pre infected who have been infected again

Since the pre infected line would be below the vaccinated as their are millions more pre infected than have better immunity and less hospitalizations than vaccinated, you won't get the graph to make the political point you wanted too.

 

Did you read it? I gave you the actual events with over 2 million participants and their outcomes.
What does your 257 people represent?

Previous infected and vaccinated all do better than just unvaccinated.
Did you need to read that to know that?

 

Do you really want me to point you to threads and posts where specific conservative posters insist of gloating over the fact people are suddenly dying somewhere from COVID? Cause I can do if you want me to

Point is no-one should be celebrating the deaths caused by this disease, but since it long ago morphed from a medical issue into a political issue some do. And so far? Anecdotal evidence on this forum would seem to indicate it's more often some i.e. a few, a small number of the more hard right conservative posters, who object to all forms public health mandates etc that seem to be the ones doing most of the gloating.

 

So you had to read that to know that?
Who claimed not having the vaccine gave you better immunity? NOBODY
The claim is pre infected (and for those who don't know what that means are people who already had the virus and now have immunity) have greater immunity than just vaccinated who never had the virus.
How did that just go right over your head so easily?

It then claims if you already had Covid, and have better immunity than the vaccinated, one dose of the Pfiser shot will increase your immunity even further.

Did you not pick up on unvaccinated meaning people who never had the vaccine and were never infected or did that go right over your head as well?
Which is why they are labeled unvaccinated and pre infected.
Jesus dude, Really?

 

And now we see the typical response from liberals once they've been outwitted... buzzwords and strawman labels... (insults would be included as well if they weren't against this forum's rules).

 

You misread my sentence. Here's how the study ranked people, #1 being best performer:

#1 - previously infected and vaccinated
#2 - previously infected
#3 - vaccinated

There were not 2 million participants. There were 2.5 million records in the database they sourced records from. They used a tiny fraction of these records.

The 257 is the number of people used to compare the effectiveness of being vaccinated to being previously infected.

 

sure they would.... good thing they are

#8 says it very clearly, easy to understand, for most

 

Dems cheering his death. SMH. Meanwhile some have died from the vaxx itself. You don’t see cons cheering that.

 

Dude, you claimed the vaccines aren't affective. LOL

Also, you clearly do not know what you are reading in regards to the Israel study, there were not 2 million participants. LOL

 

Who is cheering anyone's death?

How is creating an OP of an antivaxxists death cheering their death?

 

I can’t help if you aren’t paying attention to responses.

 

I am. What I do pay attention to are the sheepish responses from rightists in regards to this former policeman's death.

 

No you aren’t. The sheepish responses are most certainly coming from the left. And many are cheering his death. I can’t help if you refuse to acknowledge it.

 

Case in point, you double down. LOL

 

Doubling down on the truth is the appropriate action.