Russia Declares War on Ukraine<<MOD WARNING>>

bad day at the office for a bunch of Ukrainians....looks like they are trying to salvage a wreck and got bushwacked by a T-72....guess they both though the other was friendly until the Russia realised they weren't
Wonder why they used the main gun at such a close range though the co-ax would be better....anyway....bad day for these guys....



Link to video.... BOOM

 

EU to help ICC investigate war crimes in Ukraine

https://www.dw.com/en/eu-to-help-ic...r&r=9726011173921327&lid=2117327&pm_ln=142671

 

Absolute world domination? Jesus, dude.

 

13 km long Russian military convoy approaching Ukraine’s Donbas, satellite photos show

https://globalnews.ca/news/8751251/...erNational&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=2022

 

and they're off....first round the bend is False Flag...followed closely by Total Bollocks.....AND A FALLER at the first hurdle...Truth...Truth has taken a tumble....

 

....and, oh no, Red Line has stumbled awkwardly over Truth and come up limping....

 

Zelensky says there are tens of thousands dead in Mariupol.

 

There were 25,000+ Ukrainian troops in Mariupol at the beginning of the conflict. Do the maths.

 

10% of the Ukraine army, where did you get that BS figure from, RT ?
Math evades some people.

 

If you were all killing as many soldiers as you claim, there wouldn't be any Ukrainian military left.

The Ukrainians have exposed the russian military as third rate at best.

 

What about India and China?
If the US survived, they would be very weak and vulnerable.
Same for Russia. Please, play your imaginary game to the end... what would it be like after a nuclear burn-out?

 

Certainly evades you. Start counting from 600,000. And don;t forget, foreign 'volunteers' are not included in 600,000.

 

OK, so you are just plain making things up now. You are also telegraphing Russia's deflection for the mass murder it committed in Mariupol - it will declare that every dead Ukranian body was a Ukranian fighter (or killed by the Ukranians themselves).

I think we can also safely assume that the Azov battalion's numbers will be wildly inflated beyond the 2000-3000 known to be in their ranks. Jenny is already talking 4,000. I think you guys can do better than that. See who can be the first to claim 10,000.

 

Even after an exchange of nuclear strikes, the United States will be able to keep about 500 strategic missiles with 3,000 warheads on submarines, which will allow them to dictate their ultimatums to any state. While Russia will use up and lose everything. The US elite will simply move to another place on Earth and from there they will rule the whole world.

 

Huh....I'm not killing anyone. That's way off the mark. The Ukrainian forces amount to 600,000. A sizeable force. 250,000 are the regular troops, well trained and well equipped. They've been trained by NATO/US/UK instructors at home and abroad since 2015. The Russian forces, at third rate as you call them, entered the theatre with 160,000-190,000 soldiers.

It's funny, how the U.S army, for all those years never engages the third rate Russian army directly. If they were so bad, why don't you take on them?

 

Who organized the defense of the city, he is responsible for the loss of the civilian population. Not a single army in the world fights taking into account the presence of civilians. This is not a function of the army, but of the police.

 

Who illegally invaded Ukraine and rained bombs, missiles & artillery shells on Ukrainian cities? HE is responsible for EVERY SINGLE death that results from that decision. Russia can stop killing Ukranian civillians any time it wishes by going back to Russia.

You have to have a terminally warped view of the world to blame people defending their nation against invasion for the deaths of people killed by the invaders.

 

Don't act stupid. You know very well that the Ukrainian country fully mobilised the reserves. So 600,000 troops is just about right. And it's a fact that nearly half of the Ukrainian regular troops were deployed in Donbas/Mariupol region just before the conflict started.

 

Feel free to provide non-propaganda evidence of numbers in Mariupol - soldiers, deaths etc. Your word alone is worthless.

 

No one deliberately kills civilians in Ukraine. The military needs to stop mixing with the civilians.

 

Russia has every right to prevent the creation of NATO missile bases in order to destroy Russia from the territory of Ukraine.

 

In general I think Mariupol is going to be an interesting conundrum for the Russians and Ukrainians I reckon? For the Ukrainians its loss would undoubtably be a blow to morale but opens a whole new can of worms for the Russians. Whilst its' loss could open up a new round of peace negotiations I would imagine that Mariupol is being prepared as a meat grinding killing zone for the occupying Russian forces; it really doesn't need many troops to conduct a very nasty insurgency to an occupying force that would have to remain in situ to hold it. Whilst the Russians are like lumps of concrete once they dig in, Mariupol will suck in a lot of Russian troops should they want to take and hold it. I would imagine that these occupiers are not going to be their best or most motivated troops as these will be needed on other fronts as likely will a lot of their equipment. If it were me I'd be looking at the extensive array of underground facilities like sewers/tunnels and basement as conduits to prosecute a meaningful insurgency/weapons/explosives dumps and so on as well as communications etc. etc. and would be preparing the rubble for some pretty nasty IEDs
So if Mariupol is "lost" I'm pretty sure it's still going to be contested and will require a lot of body bags for a lot of Russians killed by not a lot of motivated Ukrainians.

 

How about nuclear submarines in Baltic and black seas? Is Russia going to drain the seas?

 

NATO couldn't destroy Russia from Poland?

We could destroy Russia from space in about an hour. Oh wait, we didn't put nukes or Rods from God in space...