I wasn't trying to refute it. That's the perfect example of why you liberals don't understand the purpose of the Court. The Supreme Court is an entity to interpret the laws with respect to the Constitution. It's not a place to go to get what you want.
For those 0.015% effected 1. They will take the morning after pill 2. They will go to a state that has voted to allow abortions. Problem solved
Women are no less or more human than their babies. But nice try supporting your extremist position. Murder is always extreme. Oh and it was the Klan and before that the supporters of slavery trying to defend the loathesome institution of slavery from abolitionists.
Oh, I was under the impression its what you wanted since you claimed to know everything about my friends And my anger towards vile women are those who get 9-15 abortions using abortions as their default anti pregnancy device instead of taking responsibility as an adult. What does it tell you when their are more abortions than births? I know what it tells the rest of the world. You can go on and on about your man hating claims all you want but the numbers speak for themselves.
Semantics? You mean like pointing out that you first claimed tricking women wasn't rape, then claiming it was rape? Which is why I (and others) asked you, what is tricking women to bed that you still haven't answered in several post? Seems you use the word Semantics when you don't want to answer a question about your own post.
Baseless hyperbole. But democrats only option these days is to flat out lie. Why? Because if they don't , no one might listen to them anymore...
But according to pro liners, life begins at the moment of conception. So the MA pill is also murder. A modicum of logic should tell you that. Many people cannot afford to travel.
Likely true. The lefty media all claim that at least 59% of the public want abortion. I suppose they can go out and try to cobble together a coalition that can create the basis for their amendment. Best of luck to them.
I did not claim that. In fact à couple of months ago I said any attempts at sex which is denied is rape. Now get back to the subject of men who trick women to have sex are now denying them the possibility of sorting out something no one wants. The problem isnt women. The problem is men who can't understand the word NO or who think therecare no consequences resulting from 30 seconds of muscular thrill. I suspect you have little or no imagination or empathy for women. That you have adopted the pré war attitude of à woman's place and value. That they should be another Mother, serving your requirements. Sod that.
I know, you aren't familiar with, or otherwise read in on the law, but you commented anyway. You do realize that at the core of this dispute isn't the act of medical euthanasia of unborn children... The medical craft is pretty straight forward, and safe. For the most part. The question is who in the law has the ability to regulate this. The constitution says it's up to the states. And via their directly elected office holders. Why do you suddenly fear this? More, should you wish to enshrine this into the constitutional framework, push an amendment. Gather your hoards and try making the case that mostly minority children should never be born. That sounds like a real winner, doesn't it. At least democrats will finally admit that they never actually changed, you know, racists and all that they are.. And they can, in public, declare that these mostly minority children don't deserve to live their lives. What a show of your "equity" huh... It really is laughable.
It is so disappointing that too many think such a fundamental issue as the rights of women, is always couched in yet another snowball fight. The yayaya silliness becomes the subject and once again, the plight of women is drowned out by ridiculous accusations in the most overgeneralised nonsense resulting in comedy worthy of à national award. IMO it is clear that everything is reduced to snowballfights. And that full understanding of issues is avoided at all costs. Issues then cannot be debate. Just slugg3d out until everyone gets bored and switches to another subject. Not for me. I'll just stand aside and laugh at the comédy.
Speaking of a modicum of logic, you seem to be totally unaware of emergency contraception and have some crazed fantasy about some power of the pro lifers. Emergency contraception can prevent pregnancy when taken up to five days following sexual intercourse. There are two EC pills approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that are a concentrated dose of progestin, a hormone found in many birth control pills, which inhibits or delays ovulation and will not work if a woman is already pregnant. Emergency contraception is not intended to be used as a regular form of birth control, and emergency contraception methods should not be confused with the abortion pill, RU-486 Plan B, one form of emergency contraception that can prevent pregnancy when taken within 72 hours of sexual intercourse, was first approved by the FDA in 1999 for prescription use only for women of all ages. In 2006, Plan B was approved by the FDA as an over-the-counter form of emergency contraception for women ages 18 years and older; women ages 17 and younger needed a doctor's prescription in order to receive Plan B. Then, in April 2009, the FDA issued a statement announcing that in accordance with a court's order, it would make Plan B available to women 17 and older without a prescription. Duramed Pharmaceuticals received approval in July 2009 for over-the-counter availability of Plan B One-Step (a one-dose version of Plan B) for women ages 17 years and older and prescription availability of Plan B One-Step for women younger than age 17 years. In June 2009, the FDA approved a generic prescription-only version of Plan B emergency contraceptive for women ages 17 and younger. In August 2010, the FDA approved a new form of prescription-only emergency contraception, ella, which can prevent pregnancy if taken up to 120 hours, or five days, after a contraceptive failure or unprotected sexual intercourse. In December 2011, the FDA approved the over-the-counter sale of Plan B One-Step for all women of child-bearing age. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius disagreed with the FDA's decision and Plan B One-Step remains available for all ages, but still requires a prescription for women under the age of 17. Seems you are all out of excuses but at least you gained some education. I find it amazing that a woman would go on and on about about raped women being forced to have a rapist baby because a pro lifer told them so or being forced to have a baby because no options exist. So does that answer your question? Or are you just here for your man hating agenda?
You don't get it do you? If life begins at cconception, any interférence with that is murder if you are pro life. The issue isnr contraception. It is the morality of abortion as spoken by pro life enthusiasts. It really is that simple. You cannot have "nearly alive" or "partly human". If life is when fertilisation takes place, then any contraception that occurred after that is murder.
So now you claim, you didn't post this? Delirious You must be speaking from experience as I have never heard any women claim they were tricked into sex. Either that or you think women are pretty dumb. Were you ever going to explain how these women are tricked into sex or just keep running from the same comment over and over? Yeah, its called rape. Sounds more like you projecting. Must have been tricked into sex and now you think all women can be tricked into sex. Speaking of imagination, you seem to run to it every time you find yourself unable to support one of your magical theories.
So what you are saying is, you live your life according to what pro lifers say instead of the laws that protect you and provide you with contraception and EC. This is your argument? Now I understand your tricked into sex claim. lol
When you return to the subject and stop protecting and fantasising, I'll answer. Since you turn every post into a personal accusation, they are diversionary and worthless.
This histeria can be utilized by the left to deflect from actual problems plaguing America aka inflation, gas prices etc.
The hysteria was generated not by the government but by the so called non political SC. Except that the séparation of politics and the judiciary has completely broken down in the US.
BS, You can't answer because you can't dispute what I posted. No different than your hypocrisy below You mean like your post of personal accusations? You can keep running from my post all you want. It only proves you have no ability to dispute whats posted.
So the US should pass a law to make wide neutral zones around pro life offices... right? Because it seems that being pro life and being firebombed by protesting lunatics and all might be stressful.
Speaking of our bodies being our own. Look at how these people are conducting themselves. They act like the possessed after having been sprinkled with holy water. Get a grip, people.
Hilarious, You make these claims But when I educate you on the fact that Emergency contraception is available even in the face of what a pro lifer wants, you respond with this? You seem very confused. You act like pro lifers dictate your life then claim its gibberish to show you they don't.
