There is no video of the Limo "incident". Every eyewitness agrees that no such thing happened. Yet, this corrupt committee put it on national television, after the doctored tape of Trump's speech. And you wonder why this reflects on the the Committee's credibility? Do you really?
Multiple public reports now that a similar version of the story told to Cassie was circulating in the SS at the time. Hello, please try to keep up.
Cip's testimony will be video recorded. That's what we were talking about. Source? Nothing was "doctored." Showing a clip isn't "doctoring." And no one cares if he really reached for the wheel or not. The important part is that he wanted to march to the Capitol and threw a tantrum when he couldn't. And I haven't seen anyone who denies that part.
The word is YUGE... Zorro. That is story book man Exactly... yardmeat.... what does the limo have to do with legislative responsibility at all...
Will he get a hug from Cheney? ""The important part is that he wanted to march to the Capitol and threw a tantrum when he couldn't. And I haven't seen anyone who denies that part"" oh great knowledge of all things Jan. 6....please tell us why Trump was not taken to the capitol that day? No one denies that part. March does not mean ride in a SUV.
The Limo incident shows the intent to lead the insurrection and that the SS stopped that from happening.
Yea showing clips that are doctored is "doctoring" https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...etween-mark-meadows-and-jim-jordan/ar-AARQzZt video "clip" here... https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...t-message-between-mark-meadows-and-jim-jordan https://townhall.com/tipsheet/sarah...estigators-altered-evidence-and-lied-n2608607 https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...altering-evidence-and-lying-about-it-n1605016
I agree with this. But I think he's going to use it as an excuse in his deposition to the Committee. A whole different story when he's questioned by the DoJ. They won't be so lenient.
You didn't address what you were responding to. If every "eye witness" (people in the vehicle with Trump) say it didn't happen it is irrelevant what rumors people spread about Trump after he was voted out of office. The Committee has subpoena power and could have compelled testimony from the people allegedly in the car with Trump when it supposeddly happened. They never issued a subpoena or even called them to corroborate the rumors she spread from the hallway like an gossipy school girl.
to me this is easy. were cippilone's paychecks from the treasury or from whatever corporate account trump uses.
Actually I did. Multiple sources have confirmed vary accounts of the incident by SS agents, so something did happen when the Despot Wannabe did not get his way. Try to stay focused and keep up until you have new talking points. The multiple sources can be easily sourced on the web, There are a few so take your pick.
Multiple sources say they heard the same rumor. That's not addressing what was said. Try again. Maybe the third time will be the charm.
Clearly there are time constraints in getting his complete testimony if he invokes a-c, even if he does so illegitimately. The committee needs to its report finished by the early fall.
Trump admitted to wanting to go to the Capital. That's been confirmed by Ornato. The matter in question, completely insignificant though it is, is about lunging at the wheel. Who cares?
Keep deflecting to some mythical straw man, pro tip maybe? Try dry straw because the one you're using just failed again.
It doesn't matter that Trump wanted to go to the Capital. That's not the interesting part of the allegation. The interesting part is that Trump allegedly battered a Secret Service agent and attempted to take control of the vehicle.