A word about Nancy as she steps down from leadership.

Potential is putting it mildly, come on Tony, lets be real

 

I disagree with Pelosi's position on members of Congress being able to trade stocks. She's just wrong.

 

Sure you have

 

So, more rules for thee but not for me? Why am I not surprised? If Trump did that you would be making 100s of threads about it. You make me laugh

 

She represented the “end of bipartisanship”, and since she took over the US has been in an acrimonious slide ever since.

 

So you admit you made a praise thread for a known insider trader?
NICE!

 

Well how about her Hubby, nice shell game huh

 

Wow, so her husband owning an investment firm is now a sign of corruption?

Here is an article that shows all the trades done by his investment firm in 2021. All the transactions were in well known companies such as Aaple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft etc. These companies are well researched by everyone and traded by most big investment firms. These types of companies based on the amount of shares traded, are very difficult to manipulate or do insider trading. I know, because the stock market is what I have done for 47 years as an analyst.

Insider trading is usually done with small companies that few trade or know about where having insider information can be of great assistance. None of the trades done by her husband fits that bill.

See every stock trade House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi, has made since 2021

You seem to have no specific knowledge of any insider trading done by Pelosi and yet you follow the gossip and misinformation that is put out there by politically biased people that are simply trying to discredit someone for political benefit and not for actual acts that they are accused of by people like you.

No actual official accusations have ever been made against Nancy and her husband for insider trading.

By Tom KertscherJune 30, 2020
No sign Nancy Pelosi made millions trading on insider coronavirus information

Nonetheless, none of this means anything to you, does it? Lets accuse, even though there is no evidence or proof, or even an inkling of it being true. Lets put down those that don't believe what you are saying. You know more than even the experts do.

What is so funny is that you viciously attack people that say negative things about Trump with 10 times more probability of being correct that those attacking Pelosi. It is the height of Hypocrisy. Trump's guilt has to be proven in a court of law before it can be believed, but believe my words when I say Pelosi is guilty with no proof at all to show.

It is virtually hilarious to watch your posts.

 

A bill which was a total failure and she didn't even know what was in it when it was passed.

THAT is her greatest accomplishment?

About a great accomplishment being RESULTS not just passing bills, actual results. Dems always speak of results and having success because they think about something, have conversations about things, pass pieces of paper that do nothing that they are supposed to do an of course care about things.

 

Done with shameless bribery so bad it got the moniker “The Cornhusker Kickback”, and unions were exempted.

 

LMAO, just forget it You have done nothing to change my mind about avatars, anonymity and forums

 

He didn't see her extend her hand and he didn't shake Pence's hand either just as Biden did not shake hands.
16:45


And her act was planned she even prepared to do it before the speech ended. It was a ugly despicable act on her part insulting the PRESIDENCY.

 

What's Ludacris is you minimizing a congressman that was shot with a gun on a baseball field by a nut bag left-wing gunman who was actively hunting members of Congress on the right.

 

Pelosi accomplished more for the Democrats than any other person over the past 50 years. Competency has to be

FYI, I never expected to change your mind about anything. In 4 years I have been on political boards, I have never been able to get a Trump supporter to see, evaluate and much less accept data, facts, and truths. Trump supporters believe blindly what they are told by their leaders and never believe anyone or anything else than that.

FYI, I never expected to change your mind about anything. In 4 years I have been on political boards, I have never been able to get a Trump supporter to see, evaluate and much less accept data, facts, and truths. Trump supporters believe blindly what they are told by their leaders and never believe anyone or anything else.

That is allright, though. I am a believer in the adage that we all have to learn our own lessons and that we will gain the benefits and suffer the consequences of our own decisions.

In simple words, you believing or not believing the information I am giving is of no concern to me.

 

Triggered much? Pence didn't extend his hand, Nancy extended her's.

 

And in four years you clearly haven't mastered staying on topic

And apparently, editing either

 

Yea, they hated her with passion.

Me, - I'm glad to see her go. I was never a fan, but I didn't hate her. Dems kept her in that position for a reason, but I am not a Dem, so what do I care.

 

Talking about despicable acts, this one from Trump saying that George Floyd's death was a "great day" is much more despicable.



How come you never mentioned that?

 

As usual, attacking the poster (not addressing the topic) is your preferred response.

Just remember that:



He is the one that is going to judge you, and I guarantee that you will not be able to use the same tactic with him.

 

It went exactly as I expected. I asked.........."I wonder if it's possible for those on the Right to take a step back, put their hatred aside, briefly forget about the decades long campaign to demonize her, and appreciate Mrs. Pelosi for what she was. One of the most consequential politicians, male or female, of the last 15 years having been elected Speaker in 2007."..............and that question has been answered in the way I thought it would be. Hate trumped reason as it often does among The Following.

 

I don't "hate" Nancy. I was just referring to that ONE specific act. Which you seem to sugar coat. As I said. Rules for thee but not for me. Maybe if you acknowledged it was in poor taste instead of making lame excuses I could take you more seriously.
Let me give an example. Trump calling Hillary a "Nasty Woman". I called him out for that and did not make lame excuses even though I support him.
As I said, RULES FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE
You people don't even make an effort to hide it anymore.

SHAME!!!!!!!

 

Again what sort of compromises are possible when the basic views of the two parties, leaving out neocons for now, are diametrically opposed?

 

Talk about diversions................stick to the topic.

 

I thought her role was to do it for the American People.