Mass Killings at Virginia Walmart

I am starting to doubt your claim you support the second amendment.

 

the aesop fox fable appears again in your post

 

when you ask a gun banner if their laws work, you assume the topic is crime control. In reality it is the harassment of lawful gun owners. so that is the context that they judge gun control laws

 

Yup! that's actually a Daniel Defense in that photo, mine is a DD5V3 with the 16" barrel, but it's a beauty to shoot. There was a guy selling mine locally, never been fired, but it was in a color called Deep Woods Green and I wasn't sure I'd like it, but one look in person and the price he was asking was all it took.

 

I bought my son a DD and myself one a month before the wicked would be witch of the west wing lost. Great guns though my son probably prefers his Armalite 3G competition rifle a little better since it has a top of the line match trigger in it. we have a bunch of top of the line ARs and the DD are among the best. others include a HM defense built to my specs by the factory. a Windham Proctor signature carbine, and a FAXON arms ultra lite Ion

 

You do need help. You just won't admit it.

 

This story disappeared from the front page already.

 

the only help i need is other gun owners understanding the craven desires of the anti gun left and telling those gun banners to stick their anti gun schemes where the light don't shine. I have been dealing with the anti gun left since Carter was screwing up the oval office and I know damn well that crime control is not what motivates the activists in the anti gun movement.. Sure it might motivate the low wattage soccer moms who want something to be DONE but I am talking about hard core anti gun scum like Feinstein, Schumer, Kelly, etc

 

Drugs are illegal.....derp!

 

Well, if the goal is to reduce gun violence, how do you feel about three strike laws? the death penalty for drug dealers? making firearm safety part of public high school curriculum in all 50 states? maybe a publicly-funded "gun safe for every home" program?

Any common ground on any of those ideas?

FWIW, I think we'd probably agree on reducing barriers to accessing mental healthcare, depending on the specifics of how you wanted to achieve that.

 

You're the one who's exhibiting it not me.
You clearly do not understand what the official definition is. You want it to exclude common gang violence for your agenda but the fact of the matter is it does include common gang violence.

I know it's terribly inconvenient to the narrative that around 99% of mass shootings are common gang violence.

But who gives a damn about inner city violence right? Certainly not Democrat

 

Your doubts are meaningless to me but I have been on this forum longer than you and you are free to dig through my old posts the subject. There is nearly a decade of material.

 

Where does it say " in your name "?

You know that is what you claimed they do.

 

Oh so now you are moving the goal post.

 

I have better things to do but I am going on what you have written recently

 

Maybe it was another gay guy like the one that shot up the gay nightclub in Colorado Springs.

 

Yup.

 

Yep the US is the highest (or perhaps worst depending on perspective) of industrialized nations. Too bad this doesn't include suicide by gun, the US would have moved up 40 places in the list.

 

Answer my question please.

 

I moved nothing.
I remained firmly attached to what the oath says.

It is a pity the Oath Keepers didn't.

 

Yes you did

What you said is not in the oath

 

You first

 

Shucks, I forgot to include accidental deaths by guns, almost make it to the top (bottom?) 10

 

You seem really uninformed...
So, being the magnanimous prince of a guy (that everybody at PF knows that I am)...
HERE are the FACTS:
You posed a Question to Me in Post #49:
You do understand how the FBI defines a mass shooting right?
And, I posed the Question in Post #158
Do you?
Based on that question, it appears that limited knowledg of the subject matter is being exhibited.
I would like to hear YOUR "understanding" of:
How the FBI "defines mass shootings"...
Anyway, HERE Is The Answer:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation doesn't have a mass shooting definition. Instead, the FBI defines "mass murder" as an incident where four or more people are killed, which can include gun violence.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/06/05/mass-shooting-defined-meaning/7481731001/
^You're Very Welcome...

 

Now square this up with the definition you so conveniently provided in your post above this one.
Show me where it says that the victims have to be unknown to the shooter.

If you would so kindly magnemoniously do so.

So the chart of the mugshots of the mass shooters that you called BS is in fact BS.... But it is not the chart that is BS

The BS is your denial that they were Mass shooters.

You're extremely and incredibly welcome