A Biden administration official is on leave after they were charged . . . .

Who gives a **** what it is.

 

First Democrats think they own democracy and now one thinks they own mathematics.

 

why, can't the right add? why do you feel the left owns mathematics?

 

It's what the woke say about a boy who wears lipstick and steals fancy luggage at the airport....

 

And? It's only been recently where fruit loops decide that they have special pronouns.

 

Imagine actually thinking there isn't!!!

 

'THE GROWNUPS ARE BACK IN CHARGE AFTER TRUMP!' Biden Official Makes History: The First Non Binary Federal Official To Face Felony Theft Charges.



Their fashion makes more sense when you realize that they are just wearing whatever they find in someone else's suitcase.

 

No one doubts that one can be trans and not steal luggage and push to mutilate children.

 

Not the left, you.

 

The gender dsyphoria which effects him so profoundly he refuses to accept his physical sex.
The dog play is pretty concerning too, honestly, from a PR standpoint, and just a fringe fetishists are not generally known as the most well adjusted of persons.
Add the apparent propensity for impulsive theft of expensive items in an environment where there are so many cameras one is almost sure to be caught, and the person in question's judgment is incredibly suspect.

 

Meaning should he be a high level government official sent to represent the nation at various diplo events, who is entrusted with a high level security clearance and access to nuclear material.
Whips his dick out? Probably about the same level of incredibly foolish shortsighted impulsive act as the felony level theft on camera. Maybe a bit more because of sex offender status.
Same with beating it on a zoom call.
Cheating on your wife isn't illegal, though it is disgusting and revelatory of a low moral character that should also exclude someone from the same level of clearance described above.
A dozen kids by the same amount? Same.
****ing an intern in the WH? Same.
You're not fit, and you bring disrepute upon the nation by holding the position.

 

He's a public official. His private sex life that he posts on twitter, and his appearance, matter because he makes them matters of public concern.
If he wanted to dress like a lady and **** his partner while they're dressed like a dog in his own home and didn't attend public events and publish photographs of him holding young boys on a leash, no one would know and so no PR hit could occur.
But he didn't want to do that, he wants it in your face, peacocking publicly about it, so it gets to be considered as associated with him and everything he does.

 

While if they committed a crime, they should be subject to appropriate prosecution. The rest seems unrelated to much of anything other than a chance to demean.

 

I am not aware of the "young boys" thing. Have you a link?

Assuming their proclivities are between consenting adults, why is it a factor in anything?

 

Gender dsyphoria is documented as making a person more at risk for suicide and a range of other issues. Its a fair thing to scrutinize or question a person's stability over, just as with an admitted history of drug use, depression, abuse, or other condition which can put a person at risk for similar issues.

Again: They are a public official who represents the nation in diplomatic circles and in public.
They dress like a clown, and parade their incredibly fringe sexual fetish in public. If they did those things in private and otherwise kept their private life private rather than making it loudly public, no one would be able to fairly scrutinize such conduct.
This is a person who must do the business of the nation on an international stage, and must have the respect of their colleagues to do so. Most nations do not respect a person who acts in this manner. They harm the reputation of the government for seriousness, just as any other whimsical clown in a public position would. Diplomatic gains are most often made through interpersonal connections amongst the diplomats and officials involved, out of mutual respect. This person could be a certified genius, but their presentation of themselves is seriously lacking.

As to whether or not: They grab the luggage, inspect the tag, tear the tag off, and wander off with it. On camera.

 

Yes, they should be prosecuted if warranted. The rest is just hateful noise.

 

Because its a strange fetish and parading it in public is against the social morays of essentially every nation on the planet.
Its off putting, and makes a person seem degenerate or at the least non-serious. Foreign dignitaries and officials who must do business with this public official, tend to be difficult to deal with to begin with. Adding this to the mix is not efficient for the operation of the business of the nation.
I don't care, for instance, if someone likes to get a glass bottom boat ride from their wife as a public official. They go proudly posting they like poop stuff on social media as a public official, that's not going to go over well.
Scat is on the same level as the whole dog or horse play fetish: Its ****ing weird, its disgusting, and people who engage in it are viewed as degenerates. Degenerates are not normally looked upon positively. That reputational damage extends to the nation, and that is a harm that should not be borne.

 

Perhaps this person got the suitcase confused with one of the many suitcases full of phony ballots used by democrats to steal the 2020 election.

 

To the left anything that they don't like to hear is "hate speech"..... Speech that you hate to hear

 

I don't find it off-putting. I find it no different on a moral level than what adults do in the privacy of their own homes, and I simply don't care.

 

I hate to hear or I simply discount due to perceived motivations of the source of the noise?

 

None of this
"Gender dysphoria is documented as making a person more at risk for suicide and a range of other issues. Its a fair thing to scrutinize or question a person's stability over, just as with an admitted history of drug use, depression, abuse, or other condition which can put a person at risk for similar issues.

Again: They are a public official who represents the nation in diplomatic circles and in public.
They dress like a clown, and parade their incredibly fringe sexual fetish in public. If they did those things in private and otherwise kept their private life private rather than making it loudly public, no one would be able to fairly scrutinize such conduct.
This is a person who must do the business of the nation on an international stage, and must have the respect of their colleagues to do so. Most nations do not respect a person who acts in this manner. They harm the reputation of the government for seriousness, just as any other whimsical clown in a public position would. Diplomatic gains are most often made through interpersonal connections amongst the diplomats and officials involved, out of mutual respect. This person could be a certified genius, but their presentation of themselves is seriously lacking."
Is hateful or noise.
The risk of suicide and other issues is documented science. Argue with the data, not with me. Scream at the sky if you want, it doesn't change facts.

Them being a public official and most nations on the planet thinking a person who acts as they do in public is a degenerate is likewise simply a fact. That is the common opinion. That is the reputational harm brought by someone acting this way. In like manner, ****s like Boebert or Taylor Greene or AOC and her little clique do a similar level of reputational harm by things like demanding blatantly unconstitutional provisions, in Boeberts case her past as a literal prostitute, Taylor Greene's apparently stirring nostalgia for the ****ing confederacy, AOC her campaign finance ****ery, tax avoidance, etc..
They too bring reputational harm to the nation and should resign their positions. Reputational harm isn't limited to being a degen who likes puppy play.

 

Let's run down your generalized demographic info then and see if there might not be a reason for that, and if you're even the sort of person I'm talking about rather than a standard Democrat party line voter:

1) What foreign nation do you represent as a public official?
2) What state do you reside in?
3) Who did you vote for (because I know you're not a public official for a foreign nation)?
4) General age range (a generation should suffice)

 

If someone is offended by the existence of another, perhaps the person offended should not be so delicate.

 

1) A major one.
2) One of them.
3) I have voted for members of both major parties, along with Green Party candidates and Libertarian Party candidates.
4)18-114