Bodily autonomy is the right to choose what happens to your body. It may intel consenting to a medical procedure or refusing a medical procedure. The operative word is “choice”, the mechanism is not the issue. I seem to know more about anti-abortion counterarguments than you. I don’t know if your argument is due to ignorance or an attempt to evade the subject, but here is a more sophisticated counterargument from a pro-life perspective.
Well sure, that's an article which wholistically addresses the subject of abortion. We have only been talking about your ridiculous 'bodily autonomy' argument, which the author does a fantastic job debunking!
It does nothing of the sort, but pushes and anti-abortion agenda under the guise of scholarly reasoning. When anyone considers a cell a human being, one knows that integrity and intellect is not the basis of such argument.
gamma875 said: ↑ It does nothing of the sort, but pushes and anti-abortion agenda under the guise of scholarly reasoning. When anyone considers a cell a human being, one knows that integrity and intellect is not the basis of such argument. Where TF did she mention "human life" ? NO where. I had to answer because getting an answer from you is nearly impossible..
The opinion piece does not argue with the fact that abortion is an act of bodily autonomy, it is saying it is an inadequate reason for taking the life of the unborn. That is where your argument should be instead of this childish and petty quibbling and denial. It's clear you have psychological issues that I am no longer going to encourage.
FoxHastings said: ↑ Where TF did she mention "human life" ? NO where. LOL ONE OF YOUR CLASSIC DODGES ....couldn't answer the question ( knowing how wrong you were ) so you ask a totally irrelevant question .... You have it down pat...the Perfect Evasive Dodge ! So many! How about the one in post 4262....you know the one you quoted and DODGED ""FoxHastings said: ↑ Where TF did she mention "human life" ? NO where.""""
What the **** is your problem? Which part of "the same applies" gives you so much difficulty? Ask a grade school child to explain it to you.
Why are you calling @gamma875 a SHE? HE said "human being." Why did you HAVE to answer the question that I asked someone else, just because you were waiting on some answer from me to question/s that you asked? This is ridiculous. There can be no connection between the two.
Says the person who instead of replying to some of my posts, gets them deleted! I guess that's easier than making an argument!
At the same time, it does not AFFIRM that abortion is an act of bodily autonomy. No, I think that my argument is fine where it is actually. How do I know that? Well because you clearly have no further arguments to refute mine, and are clearly looking for a way out of this absolute HELL that you have gotten yourself into with me! It's okay to admit defeat! There's no shame in that. Well, maybe just a little! Oh wow! I tell you, I have heard many different excuses for avoiding debate with me over the years, but THIS one is the funniest! Well done for coming up with it!
Yes and then as usual you veered of into stupid about non human whatever, as if such drivel is in any was relevant.
What that poster said was : gamma875 said: ↑ It does nothing of the sort, but pushes and anti-abortion agenda under the guise of scholarly reasoning. When anyone considers a cell a human being, one knows that integrity and intellect is not the basis of such argument."" AGAIN, is English not your native language???? Why are you so deeply and weirdly concerned with the gender of posters ?
