Trump indicted over hush money payments in Stormy Daniels probe

Again, you weren't in the Grand Jury room. You have no idea what evidence the DA has. Trump's lawyers have no idea what evidence the DA lawyer may have.

If it turns out that the evidence does not exist I will be the first one calling for the impeachment of the DA.

Unlike Republicans and Trump supporters, I actually want those that abuse their power while in office held to account.

 

The DA in OJ case should have done a better job. There is still debate over his guilt.

 

What he "says" is not evidence.

I can say that the Pope is actually a secret Satanist. That's proof of nothing.

 

Really not answering the question.

Since the jury found OJ not guilty was the DA wrong to bring the case in the first place?

 

The grand jury has already been selected by bias riddle actors. The entire case is being brought about by a democrat whom hates Trump. There is no evidence, it’s simply nonsensical hate.

And no you don’t, you simply don’t like Trump. So you are supported this fascism. It’s astounding tbh.

 

Dont forget Zelensky

 

I'll leave you with a history lesson.
They weren't arrested because they were already dead.
I accept your concession.


From this minute forward, you have no say in what is to happen in the future. None of us do. The best you could say as an American patriot is to confirm that the presumption of innocence shall prevail if the rule of law exists.

You may now have the last word on the above.

 

You mean the con with the largest Go Fund Me account ever?

 

Of course my suggestion would apply to all.

 

If I recall my movies about the 70's in Central America, the current status of this case would be blindfold and the command to fire....

 

Oh, so you don't know anything, you were just spit balling
Got it

 

This is anecdotal, of course, but I've been speaking with many independent voters this morning, and they are really turned off from Trump. This indictment thing is a head shaker for all, even Trump supporters I know, but the independents were already turned off.
A few previous Trump voters expressed their severe disappointment in Trump.
Your last sentence is, imo, in error.

 

As a monthly retainer fee according to Cohen

 

Was there enough evidence to charge OJ. Sure, but that's irrelevant to my point. If you hire a contractor to replace your roof, you expect him to deliver a good job or you're not going to pay him.

 

Good luck getting the only possible answer to that question ...

But I do like we are bringing OJ into the Trump indictment thread.... Bestie golfing buds....

 

It does astound how some who have strongly asserted that they are the biggest champions of keeping democracy intact, don't really care about it at all. 'Rules of Democracy' for thee but not for me.

 

The Cuban community in southern Florida has been big on Trump the whole time.
Saw a report on that a few years ago, probably shortly before the 2020 election.

 

Oh geesh, I remember when the marxist shadow president compared Trump's acquittal to OJ's.

 

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that almost anyone angry at Trump being charged for a crime was already a Trump supporter and already in his voter base.
I don't see any indication that any of this will help Trump in an election, but I have seen some indication it will hurt him.
Of course, that's anecdotal and my opinion.

 

Precisely what my meme said. Imagine that.

 

So the indictment is influencing an election.

 

I can't predict the future, but I don't see how any of this helps the Democratic Party to win in '24.

 

As far as "food for thought" goes, this is the candy corn of a "food for thought." Why do you believe that Republican politicians should be entirely immune from the law if there's a Dem in the WH? Sounds like the sort of thing the guys in your pic would have supported -- being held above the law.

 

If Trump remains the candidate, it helps them immensely. If he doesn't, it depends.

 

You've given yourself a get out of jail free card. Every time a trial takes place "evidence" exists. The question is; is the evidence sufficient for conviction?