Liberals use political correctness as de facto censorship.

So you are not familiar with the word "how".

I don't know any white males who are exempt from Constitutional protections.

 

My point is that we are not having the debates we need to have about black social pathology and the genetic reasons for it.

 

I have read studies that show the exact opposite.

RACE, EVOLUTION
AND BEHAVIOR: A Life History Perspective
2nd Special Abridged Edition
Professor J. Philippe Rushton
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

Cross-race adoptions give some of the best proof that the genes cause race differences in IQ. Growing up in a middle-class White home does not lower the average IQ for Orientals nor raise it for Blacks.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm

 

If you are referring to "American Renaissance" it is one of the most floridly racist anti Black websites I have seen, but Taylor denies being anti-Semitic and the right has criticized him for that.

I think I would trust professional geneticists over someone who chooses a racist unproven causation. "American Renaissance", it seems, looking at the comments, that rabid anti-Black racists flock to this site and they don't seem to care about "science", but only to vent their hatred. Those are the people that give support to this theory.

Excellent counterargument, professionals in the soft sciences are more stoopider, and that's why there are fewer conservatives.

I think I had a more nuanced and intelligent answer. The conservative disposition does not fit the profession.

 

Jared Taylor has said, "Jews look white to me."

He has also said:

"Wherever you look,[East] Asians outperform whites academically and financially...

"We have a considerably less than one standard deviation difference between [East] Asian IQ and white IQ. I think that, too, is a result of genetics, and I think that that is what explains the dominance of [East] Asians in certain fields, and their lower rates of illegitimacy compared to whites, their lower crime rates, their better achievement in school, their higher average incomes...

"I think [East] Asians are objectively superior to whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society."

------------

Jared Taylor is a race realist. Race realists assert a racial hierarchy with Ashkenazi Jews at the top, followed by East Asians, followed by white Gentiles, like me. Race realist think in terms of averages and tendencies, rather than absolute differences.

 

So, you complain that they dont initiate them, when anyone could do it.

 

It is dangerous to say anything critical about blacks using one's real name.

There are Negroes who behave and perform as well as most whites. The number is smaller than the number of Negroes who are criminals, welfare recipients, and/or academic failures. Nearly everyone knows that that is true. Nevertheless, those who say that publicly risks losing their jobs.

 

Maybe because those that are saying that are spreading racist propaganda. 68% of Blacks are working class and above. They are not criminals or on welfare.

 

That leaves 32% who fit into at least one of my three categories, but who cannot be publicly criticized.

 

So, no apology for spreading racist propaganda.
Sure, you can criticize the amount of Black crime, but criticizing people for being poor is mean spirited. Well, you have already proved you are that, with forced sterilizations.

 

No one would be forced to be sterilized. If they refused to be sterilized they would be denied something they had done nothing to earn.

When it comes to poor people I draw a sharp distinction between the working poor and those who live off of welfare.

 

Generally, Black people, White people, and East Asian people have different average IQ’s. However, the specific reasons for this remain controversial.” Three studies found when East Asian adoptees were raised by white parents East Asians had higher IQ’s but a study examining these studies titled, “Racial IQ Differences among Transracial Adoptees: Fact or Artifact?,” found that when East Asian, White, and Black adoptees were all raised in the same environment by white parents the difference in their IQ’s were not statistically significant, which hints at a minimal role for genes in racial IQ differences. Therefore, if Asians are inherently no smarter than other races why have Asian Americans achieved more collectively than Caucasians, African Americans and Latinos? Why do Asian Americans achieve more academically and professionally than other minorities? If it’s not genetic, it has to be environmental.


Rushton, J.P.; Jensen, A.R. Race and IQ: A Theory-Based Review of the Research in Richard Nisbett’s Intelligence and How to Get It. Open Psychol. J. 2010, 3, 9–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Lynn, R. Some Reinterpretations of the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. Intelligence 1994, 19, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


Rushton, J.P.; Jensen, A.R. Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychol. Public Policy Law 2005, 11, 235–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


Thomas, D. Racial IQ Differences among Transracial Adoptees: Fact or Artifact? J. Intell. 2017, 5, 1

 

So, no regret for spreading disinformation.
Making a mother choose between possibly becoming homeless and her children going hungry or be sterilized is a forced choice.

I noted a study earlier of homework by race and Asians studied 2 hours, whites 1 hour and Blacks 1/2 hour. That is cultural. It explains why we do well on IQ tests and STEM subjects, but are lousy at sports.

 

Children are the responsibility of their parents, not the tax payers.

Right now the least intelligent people are the most prolific. While this is happening computer technology and automation are eliminating the kinds of jobs those with below average intelligence are able to learn.

People spend a lot of time doing what they are good at. In the black majority city where I live the basket ball courts are always full of Negroes, it the weather permits. Blacks are rarely in the libraries. East Asians are. Talent comes first. Interests come later.

 

Oh, I see, so we're not talking about systematic censorship, you are worried you might get in trouble for telling them they are an inferior race in your opinion. Yea, you should worry, and you should worry about insulting anyone. It has nothing to do with censorship though.

 

With Negroes the truth can be insulting. The truths about the Negro race have legitimate policy implications. The taboos and sanctions against telling the truth need to come to an end.

 

Yes, eugenics should never have gone out of style.

 

Eugenics was a respectable cause in the West until the Nazis corrupted it by trying to annihilate the most superior demographic in the world. As computer technology and automation reduce the number of jobs people with low IQ's are able to learn, eugenics becomes more necessary than ever.

 

Again, someone putting you in your place is not censorship, its the reaction you are asking for by being blatantly racist.

 

They can call me a racist all they want as long as I am allowed to post unflattering facts about the Negro race.

 

Clearly you can post, which is what you are doing, and you can even say it in their face, which I'm pretty sure you will not do.

 

If I did they would try to disprove my claim that they have a high crime rate by beating me up.

 

Liberals use political correctness as de facto censorship to silence any and all debate that does not fit the liberal narrative, regardless of its truthfulness.

You can say things that are politically correct but are not true like there is a 22% wage gap between men and women that is the result of discrimination, but you can't say things that are true but are not politically correct like:

According to a report by the Pew Hispanic Center, in 2007 found Latinos "accounted for 40% of all sentenced federal offenders-more than triple their share (13%) of the total U.S. adult population." According to the US Department of Justice, blacks accounted for 52.5% of all homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, with whites 45.3% and "Other" 2.2%. The offending rate for blacks was almost 8 times higher than that of whites.

 

Are you saying conservatives would sit back and listen to you demean an entire race of people? I dont think so. Why? Because most people are decent people, and they wouldn't put up with it. I am referring to the study the other posted was pushing.

Give it a try. Get together with some liberal black people to discuss your studies showing how they are an inferior race.

And then get together with conservative blacks to discuss the same.

I'll say 95% of the US population would tell you to shut the heck up, and it doesn't matter if they are black, white, men or women, liberal or conservatives. You call it "political correctness" or "censorship", but the truth is that hardly anyone puts up with such nonsense because there is no place for blatant racism in a civilized society. Its not about liberals or conservatives, it's you.

So......its not censored? I can't count the times I have heard that. I hear it more than "Merry Christmas" in December.

 

There are many ways to provoke a beating, and this is one of the more effective ways. Its almost guaranteed to work, and it doesn't matter what race your audience are, because disrespect is returned with disrespect.