Gays don't have to be a race in-order for it to be considered a matter of civil rights. You haven't demonstrated this with any solid evidence....
Silhouette, is there a reason your posts in this thread have dwindled down to repetitive appeals to emotion instead of responding to arguments...
I agree completely, Silhouette. :D Perhaps a good place to start would be responding to my arguments on this "used car"?...
The person they are quoting in this article is Dr. Ronald Stall. This is what Ronald Stall has to say about why these issues are so prevalent...
I'm going to have to break my response into two separate posts: We're kind of cooking now, Silhouette. Kind of.. My premise is that sexual...
The problem, silhouette, is that I offer arguments, and you ignore them. It would make sense if you were simply too busy, but you continue to post...
I understand why this is confusing so I'm going break this down for you: "A question also arises about the size of the sample used. It is...
No, again, you're confused. The first study was questioning whether there was an inherent link between homosexuality and pathology, it was not...
You can't possibly argue with me about this if you haven't actually read the study. This is what the Evelyn Hooker study says: "A question also...
I adress every single one of your points, and then you ignore them. Who is bobbing and weaving? If I am wrong about something, I will be more...
You're taking it out of context. Do the research. The Evelyn Hooker study was seeking to find out whether or not homosexuality, itself, was a...
The keyword in the APA is "inherently." If homosexuals were "inherently less mentally healthy than heterosexuals" that would imply it was...
You're argument doesn't make sense. The Evelyn Hooker study shows that homosexuality is not pathological. In the sense that it would not be the...
How is addressing all of your points making a "smokescreen"? Indeed, if I were avoiding your points, then I would be making a smokescreen. Do you...
Silhouette, do you think you might be in denial a little bit? You have continuously avoided refuting my arguments, again you're simply just...
Separate names with a comma.
