Vietnam?
History tells us this is not true. I'm afraid with the American's its a case of 'All the gear, no idea'.
I understand the theory, but seeing as Russia appears to back China in every single global stability issue (and vice versa), and considering...
What your saying is that a countries economics, which due to Globalisation goes hand-in-hand with global politics, means that the world is...
Laughable? What is laughable is you trying to prove how something is impossible, when history tells us it has already happened.
But China exists. Assuming this hypothetical WW were to break out, it would almost certinly feature the EU, USA and China as headline acts. China...
The EU. No doubt about it.
Now, no. But this topic is about "WW3". Cuba is an enemy of the US, close to the US mainland - Any belligerent would capitalistic on that... Just...
Yep. Military stalemate and no talk of any conventional military action - Just people asking "who would launch first?" They didn't have to...
Unless Russia ships nukes there. Then, there would be nothing that anyone could do.That happened before. I return to this thread and see that...
I dont think what people describe here is a World War anymore. WW3 has happened - It was the Cold War. The west was behind the USA, the East...
If the USA attacked the EU, the EU would take 6 months to mobilize its military? Really, that's what your saying?
Yawn. So what advantage did Vietnam have that the EU does not?
The UK was an extremly strong young man. We are getting on a bit now. The EU is our pension. You can ill afford to be without a pension.
There is no evidence that the USA could defeat any small nation conventionally, let alone the EU. The US, at the height of its military power,...
Separate names with a comma.
