The Falklands - Who should own these godforsaken islands?

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Hendrix, Feb 11, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    It was their usual cruddy imperialism, ignorant, prejudiced and incompetent - as you of course know.
     
  2. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Merry old England doesn't have (officially anyway) a merry old government, and almost any country would shove 3,000 people out of the way to build a MacDonald's. Except as an oil-investment the place is not worth what is being spent on it, not by a long shot, and all the people could live in huge comfort elsewhere at half the cost. This is not a 'tiny' country but a hamlet in a big cold sea.
     
  3. MisLed

    MisLed New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    7,299
    Likes Received:
    329
    Trophy Points:
    0
    maybe so. But quite a history.
     
  4. Paris

    Paris Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Dream on, reva... In the real world, those who brag will remain braggarts... In that sense, I am very happy that France has less bragging rights than the US... Live as a fool, die as one (but my commiserations to Maggy and best wishes to Dave)
     
  5. Paris

    Paris Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I'm not squatting someone else's water lily and I'm not ashamed of my French roots.

    You must be projecting
     
  6. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    By God, that last sentence is as crazy and loathsome as anything any American weirdo could write on the nearest bogwall. That is sick! The one toad is gaga and the other mentally deficient even for a slug. You can tell people by their admirations!
     
  7. ryanm34

    ryanm34 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,189
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They are not squatting on someone else's lily pad

    It's their lily pad.
     
  8. mepal1

    mepal1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes....but at least British goverments dont make thousands of thier people mysteriously dissapear like the Argentinians have done in the recent past.
     
  9. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Different governments, you must admit.
     
  10. Paris

    Paris Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    63
    No...the British governments do that to other peoples who unfortunately inhabit the many places they want to squat
     
  11. mepal1

    mepal1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    279
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Anyway at least the British have made the island at least habitable...........what would the Argies do..............Nothing.

    The last time they were there (1982) they just made a mess of the place.

    They had no plan for any sort of development there.

    I think Sean Penn, should of actually of gone to the Falklands before giving his misguided support to the Argentinians illegitimate claims. Then....maybe he could of been a shepherd for a day, in that lovely cold bracing wind...........No i dont think he would stick more than 2 hours being there, before going back to Argentina, and telling them to forget all about taking over the Falklands!
     
  12. Paris

    Paris Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,394
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Iolo, that poster was all about how France should be ashamed of capitulating in 1940, while most Americans were sitting on their arses...I don't blame them, as I believe war is hell...However, I don't blame France either for refusing to sacrifice as many men as we did in WW1 for a disputable victory
     
  13. zulu1

    zulu1 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,220
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Clearly there IS an issue because the Argentinian's are pissed off and will remain pissed off until a diplomatic solution is arrived at relating to the contentious claims for sovereignty. 'Jaw-jaw' is preferential to 'war-war'. Pragmatically, it's in the UK's medium to long term economic interest to negotiate over the spoils of the oil.
     
  14. JIMV

    JIMV Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    25,440
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is like blaming the victims of the holocaust because evil thugs wanted scapegoats and loot.

    You confuse a legit legal issue if sovereignty with simple greed for the assets of others.
     
  15. zulu1

    zulu1 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,220
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ah, old geezers displayed on Argentine television is clearly a match for a nuclear submarine.

    The Argentine claim predates the 1832 premise that the British government invokes as the basis of legitimacy for sovereignty over the island. To suggest that Argentina has absolutely no historical claims to it when the island was administered from and answerable to a government in Buenos Aires for many years is just not tenable.

    In 1982 Argentina was a fascist dictatorship. Now she is a vibrant democracy that's open to discussion. The UK is intrasigent and the world knows it. It's the UK that is out of step not the majority of the world who is sympathetic to the Argentinian position.
     
  16. zulu1

    zulu1 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,220
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Don't be silly.
     
  17. JIMV

    JIMV Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    25,440
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nothing silly about it...The Argies have never ever held sovereignty over the Falklands except during an unlawful invasion. Just because a nation lusts after something does not mean that nation has an argument for possession.

    It is little different than the view held by some leftists that their lusting after the wealth of others gives them a moral or legal right to that wealth.

    It simply does not and no amount of pandering by opportunistic politicians changes that.
     
  18. zulu1

    zulu1 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,220
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The issue of sovereign rights is contentious which is why the 'Argies', as you derogatively put it are, by definition, pissed of...Unless, that is, you think that the 'argies' are inherently pathologically pre-disposed to violence and aggression....Ah, yep, that'll be it!
     
  19. JIMV

    JIMV Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    25,440
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not exactly though they do have a regional reputation for being a tad full of themselves with no real reason. The bottom line is pretty simple. They never owned the territory and it becoming a oil reserve does not change that.
     
  20. zulu1

    zulu1 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,220
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0

    The issue of ownership is a contentious one:

    "The American academics Reginald & Elliot in their 1983 study of the Falklands War entitled 'Tempest in a Teapot' state, "In looking at the historic claims made by Argentina and Britain for sovereignty over the Falklands/Malvinas, one is struck by the obvious sincerity of both sides, and by the absolute impossibility of reaching a fair and impartial decision based upon existing evidence."

    http://www.falklands.info/history/hist82article11.html

    Under these circumstances, it's better that a faded colonial power offer an olive branch to a rising economic power which has the support of Latin America. Pragmatically, it makes sense.
     
  21. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Britain out of the South Atlantic. Britain out of the Western Hemisphere.
     
  22. zulu1

    zulu1 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,220
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Colonial outposts in the 21st century are certainly an anachronism.
     
  23. JIMV

    JIMV Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    25,440
    Likes Received:
    852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why are colonial outposts only a colonial outpost when the colonizer is European..Half of China are colonies. An Argentine grab of another's property over the objections of the inhabitants would be a colonial move...
     
  24. raymondo

    raymondo Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    4,296
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    63
    And Bertie out of the Forum .Again .
     
  25. Marlowe

    Marlowe New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    11,444
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    0
    predates the 1832 ?

    That's a load of Bull $hit / utter rubbish ..

    As I'v said In todays democratic world the Argies have no claim as no Argentinians have ever have lived there.

    The Republic of Argentina did NOT exist - in 1832 - it was part of the Spanish Empire . The federal state known today as the Republic of Argentina was'nt formed until 1861.

    -- You're talking rubbish , as usual - GO LEARN


    ....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page