Racist Birther files ballot challenge in Alaska

So the question is this Birther just more honest than the rest? This guy is a real winner but bottom line he says that Barack Obama is not eligible because because as a Mulato, Barack Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen

Face it- we have all seen our resident race haters swarm to the Birther cause like flies to bull pucky. Is this any surprise?

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/02/racist-ballot-challenge-in-alaska/

Racist ballot challenge in Alaska
By Dr. Conspiracy on February 23, 2012 in Ballot Challenges, Racism
After reading the February 21 ballot challenge filed by Gordon Epperly in Alaska, I don’t think anyone will challenge my headline. In addition to the content of the Challenge, the web site registered by Mr. Epperly and referenced in document hyperlinks is U.S.A. The Republic, a site with substantial racist and anti-Semitic material, including “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a fraudulent tract purporting to depict a Jewish plot to take over the world.

Epperly files his Nomination Petition Objection with the Office of Director for Divisions of Elections under Alaska Statute 15.25.042 (Eligibility of a Candidate) and the Alaska Administrative Code 6 AAC 25.260 (Complaints regarding eligibility of a candidate).

Epperly presents racial information about Barack Obama’s parents as evidence that he “has the race status of of being a ‘Mulatto.’” Citing Dred Scott v Sanford in support of a claim that Obama would be no citizen of any kind except for the Fourteenth Amendment, Epperly then argues:
As Barack Hussein Obama is of the “Mulatto” race, his status of citizenship is founded upon the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Before the [purported] ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, the race of “Negro” or “Mulatto” had no standing to be citizens of the United States under the United States Constitution.

As the Fourteenth Amendment is only a grant of “Civil Rights” and not a grant of “Political Rights,” Barack Hussein Obama II does not have any “Political Rights” under any provision of the United States Constitution to hold any Public Office of the United States government. Furthermore, there is considerable debate within the enclosed supporting documents that shows Barack Hussein Obama II was not born on the soil of the United States and that he was not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States at the time of his birth. …

That is, he argues, no one who is black or half-black is eligible to serve in any elected office in the United States requiring US citizenship.
Epperly also raises the issue of the 2008 nominating certifications. He shows a photocopy of the Democratic National Committee’s “Official Certification of Nomination” filed with the State of Hawaii that contains a statement that Obama is “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” and a similar document that Epperly claims was filed in 49 other states lacking the eligibility statement. It is not entirely clear whether the photocopied Certification letter is actually from Alaska, or whether he is making an inference that it is what is on file in Alaska because it was sent to 49 states. The 49-state claim as far as I can tell has never been substantiated. In any case Epperly reasons that since this 2008 letter is the only document on file in the State of Alaska, Obama isn’t qualified to be on the ballot.

Epperly tackles the authority of the oft-cited Ankeny v Governor in a strangely worded section stating:

The United States Department of Law is misrepresenting this case of Steve Ankeny et.al. v. Governor of State of Indiana, No. 49A02-0904-CV-353 as a Stare decisis case which all the States of the Union may rely upon to dismiss any Complaints questioning the qualifications of Barack Hussein Obama II when in fact the case is nothing more a very poor “dicta” case that is copied from the “dicta” case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649. The cases of United States v. Wong Kim Ark and Steve Ankeny v. Governor of State of Indiana have nothing to do with the citizenship status of Barack Hussein Obama II. If there are to be controlling cases, they would have to be the U.S. Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168 and the case of Perkins v. Elg, 207 U.S. 325, 327 (1939) [sic] …

Based on these two cases, Epperly concludes (using the logical fallacy of denying the consequent) that two citizen parents are required of “natural born citizens.”

Epperly claims that a candidates responsibility is to “prove” to the Alaska Director of Elections, the facts of his birth and his parents’ allegiance under the Fourteenth Amendment (even though he previously argued that the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply).

 

I'll bet you just wish that my real name was Gordon Epperly, don't you?

 

look,I know the public educational system took your ability to think critically away,but but there are plenty of challenges to his eligibility...You see,the system is so corrupt,and judges are looking the other way for fear of their life...What part of natural born dont you get?....,What part of fraud dont you understand,he has a Conn #SSN,issued before he was born..if having common sense and an IQ over 20 makes me racist then Im a racist all day long ,get that lying,
<<< Mod Edit: Profanity Filter Bypassed >>> ,coke snortin,cigarette smokin (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) out da office...


Penn,Indiana,Miss,Alabama,Alaska....and more are coming...

DONT TALK ABOUT MY MAMA
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FUWyxmWACQ&feature=related"]Don't Talk About My Mama - YouTube[/ame]

 

Spock here. Is it true that Obama wasn't certified as Constitutionally eligible on the certification of nomination forms in 49 states?

 

So Spock- do you agree with Gordon Epperly that Obama is not eligible because Obama is a mulatto?

 

Do you agree with Gordon Epperly that Obama is not eligible to be on your ballot because Obama is a "Mulatto"?

 

Look ... it's simple.

A Black Man won The Presidency of The United States and there are some people who will be forever scared because of it.

I can live it ...

 

Odd- did the Birthers here hold an election and elect you as their spokesman? I think not.


Why do you not agree with his theory as to why Obama is not eligible, but agree with every other one?

 

I predict this will go on longer than the Grassy Knoll

 

Give it up JEFF, you won't get anyone here engaged into discussing the stupid notion. Other then Obamabots, of course.

 

no
...............

 

And yet you keep posting.

I do think it is interesting that you are the only resident Birther who has at least implied that you don't agree with this racist Birther.

All the rest of the Birthers- the ones whose hopes perk up with every ballot challenge, and post excitedly about how this time will be different- oddly silent about this one.

None of them feel any need to disassociate themselves from this challenge. Guess as long as its another ballot challenge against Obama, its okay with them.

 

No. It's not.

 

It wouldn't matter if he was. Obama lost Alaska in 2008. And after shutting down most of our oil exploration due to his BP Oil Spill (*)(*)(*)(*)up from 2 years ago, what in the hell makes you think that our state would elect him this year?

 

Maybe if any one of us had ever heard of Gordon Epperly before, we might just give a rat's ass about his opinion. Does anybody want to tell JEFF that the fish ain't biting today, or should we just let him sit there and keep hoping that he gets one?

 

I suppose a racist would consider Barack Obama black.

 

Curious. What is you logical basis behind your answer?

 

Statements of fact do not require a logical basis. They are the logical bases from which all subsequent reason must obtain.

 

, I'd bet my lunch that this is a plant.That some site coerced
this guy into doing this.Probably the scumbags at Southern Poverty Law
Center.That way it would give great fodder at MSNBC to actually run
entire segments insisting how Race Hate is alive and well in this
Country and obviously Republican inspired.
5 will getch 10 this story will make it's way on MSNBC.
It fits their narrative to a tee.

 

Nice dodge.

So... you gonna give it another shot and answer Jeff's question?

 

Oh, it's clear the fish aren't biting. They're swimming away so hard that they are losing scales.

 

You'd lose your lunch. Epperly has been a hard core Birther for years.

http://www.14th-amendment.com/Misce...To_Federal_Election_Commission_[06-18-08].pdf

 

Guy coulda had his Uncle a lawyer or a neighbor help him
file suit.Proves nothing.In fact our government have all kinds of wacky
types they use as scapegoat for instigating Riots or false flags.